From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Citations, continued
Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 10:28:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d25kpxap.fsf@pank.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87y4o9s5qc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr
Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Using the example from Erik Hetzner in the same thread, what about:
>
> 1. [cite:@item1] says blah.
> 2. [cite:@item1: p. 30] says blah.
Why is "p." stripped here?
> 3. [cite:@item1: p. 30, with suffix] says blah.
> 4. [cite:@item1: -@item2 p. 30; see also @item3] says blah.
If item{1,2} have the same author biblatex[-chicago?] is smart enough to
compress it to "author (year1, year2)". So this example seems like a
downgrade if "-" is required to get the suggested output.
> 5. A citation group [cite:: see @item1 p. 34-35; also @item3 chap. 3].
Why is chap. *not* stripped here?
> 6. Another one [cite::see @item1 p. 34-35].
> 7. Citation with a suffix and locator [cite:: @item1 pp. 33, 35-37, and nowhere else].
Where does suffix and locator end here. E.g. what is the output of
[cite:: @item1 33, pp. 35-37, and nowhere else].
> 9. Citation with suffix only [cite:: @item1 and nowhere else].
How do I know this is a suffix? Is locator a regexp like
\`[p\.0-9 ]+?
What is [cite:@K s. 12] or [cite:@K side.? 12]?
> 10. Like a citation without author: [cite:: -@item1], and now Doe
> with a locator [cite:: -@item2 p. 44].
> 2. Doe (2005, 30) says blah.
> 5. A citation group (see Doe 2005, 34–35; also Doe and Roe 2007, chap. 3).
> 7. Citation with a suffix and locator (Doe 2005, 33, 35–37, and nowhere else).
> Note that space after the second colon is not mandatory. More
> explicitly, syntax would be either
>
> [cite:IN-TEXT-KEY]
>
> or
>
> [cite:IN-TEXT-KEY?:SPACE* CITATIONS]
>
> where CITATIONS is any number of
>
> PREFIX? KEY SUFFIX?
>
> separated with semi-colons.
What if I need several text cite keys. Say @K{1,2} is the same author A,
and @K3 is B. Then [cite:@K1,@K2,@K3] should/could be something like
A (Y1, Y2), and B (Y3). How do I express this?
Some comments.
1. Am I supposed to distinguish between a text citations and parenthesis
citation based on a single ":"? That's hard. Why not distinguish
based on the initial label? E.g. {textcite, parentcite} or {citet,
citep}.
2. The idea of locator /and/ suffix is confusing. The fact that your
examples suggest seemingly random dropping of data from locator makes
me want to avoid it even more. It's a 'can of worms' to use a
frequently emerging expression from this list.
3. This is almost full circle. The proposal above seems no better (and
IMO worse) than e.g. the generalized links that Tom suggested, e.g.
[TYPE: KEY :pre PRE :post SUF] or [TYPE: PRE @KEY POST].
Or [[TYPE: KEY :pre PRE :post SUF]] or [[TYPE: PRE @KEY POST]].
4. The reason for suggested syntax seems to be support some benchmark
like A1 (Y1, Y2 also A2, Y3). I have never come across a nested
citation like this. I have seen either (A1 Y1, Y2 and A2, Y3) or
A1 (Y1, Y2) and A2 (Y3). . .
5. . . . Yet I still don't know how to get A1 (PRE Y2) with the above.
Is the benchmark correct?
If parsing speed is key here I think that
[citet: pre1 @k1 post1; pre2 @k2 post2] and [citep: pre1 @k1 post1; pre2 @k2 post2]
are clearer solutions. But this is clearly closer to a LaTeX than pandoc.
—Rasmus
--
Dung makes an excellent fertilizer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-08 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-31 18:26 Citations, continued Richard Lawrence
2015-01-31 18:42 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-02-01 22:07 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-02 13:52 ` Rasmus
2015-02-02 17:25 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-02 18:09 ` Rasmus
2015-02-02 15:45 ` Erik Hetzner
2015-02-01 22:06 ` John Kitchin
2015-02-02 1:41 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-02 4:43 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-02-02 13:56 ` John Kitchin
2015-02-02 18:11 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-02-02 19:38 ` John Kitchin
2015-02-02 19:51 ` John Kitchin
2015-02-02 22:47 ` Rasmus
2015-02-03 0:54 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-02-03 1:36 ` John Kitchin
2015-02-02 14:17 ` Rasmus
2015-02-02 16:58 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-02 14:07 ` Rasmus
2015-02-02 13:51 ` Rasmus
2015-02-02 15:09 ` Matt Price
2015-02-02 18:02 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-02 19:55 ` Rasmus
2015-02-03 1:56 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-03 2:08 ` Vikas Rawal
2015-02-03 10:55 ` Rasmus
2015-02-04 10:35 ` Julian M. Burgos
2015-02-04 16:34 ` John Kitchin
2015-02-03 10:35 ` Rasmus
2015-02-03 12:00 ` Eric S Fraga
2015-02-03 16:27 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-03 17:25 ` Eric S Fraga
2015-02-03 3:58 ` Erik Hetzner
2015-02-03 4:41 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-03 7:30 ` Erik Hetzner
2015-02-03 16:11 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-04 6:30 ` Erik Hetzner
2015-02-04 12:06 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-02-04 16:45 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-06 10:27 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-02-06 22:41 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-07 22:43 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-02-08 2:46 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-08 9:46 ` John Kitchin
2015-02-08 17:09 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-08 22:23 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-02-09 8:46 ` e.fraga
2015-02-09 10:50 ` Rasmus
2015-02-09 11:20 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-02-09 11:37 ` Rasmus
2015-02-10 9:06 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-02-09 15:09 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-02-10 8:55 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-02-10 9:22 ` Rasmus
2015-02-10 9:41 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-02-10 10:01 ` Rasmus
2015-02-10 15:32 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-02-10 1:50 ` John Kitchin
2015-02-09 17:46 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-09 20:13 ` Rasmus
2015-02-10 1:32 ` John Kitchin
2015-02-10 4:04 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-10 5:23 ` John Kitchin
2015-02-10 6:20 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-02-08 9:58 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-02-08 17:18 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-08 18:18 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-02-08 9:28 ` Rasmus [this message]
2015-02-08 10:18 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-02-08 10:50 ` Rasmus
2015-02-08 12:36 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-02-08 13:40 ` Rasmus
2015-02-08 16:11 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-02-09 10:02 ` Rasmus
2015-02-08 17:02 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-02-08 17:29 ` Rasmus
2015-02-10 1:54 ` John Kitchin
2015-02-10 8:49 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-02-10 9:20 ` Rasmus
2015-02-10 10:05 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2015-02-10 10:36 ` Rasmus
2015-02-10 10:53 ` Andreas Leha
2015-02-10 15:03 ` John Kitchin
2015-02-10 15:54 ` Rasmus
2015-02-10 16:14 ` John Kitchin
2015-02-10 16:22 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-10 16:44 ` Stefan Nobis
2015-02-11 2:07 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-11 10:19 ` Stefan Nobis
2015-02-11 16:51 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-13 2:31 ` Matt Price
2015-02-11 10:47 ` Aaron Ecay
2015-02-11 11:32 ` Rasmus
2015-02-10 16:04 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-11 2:10 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-02-11 2:48 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-11 3:53 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-02-06 23:37 ` Rasmus
2015-02-06 23:16 ` Rasmus
2015-02-04 17:44 ` Erik Hetzner
2015-02-04 15:59 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-02-04 17:58 ` Erik Hetzner
2015-02-04 19:24 ` Richard Lawrence
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d25kpxap.fsf@pank.eu \
--to=rasmus@gmx.us \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).