Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

[9661031]

--text follows this line--

Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen.  You don't know how to make a good report?  See

     http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback

Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

When you use a headline which is more than 7th level,the exported LaTeX file
raises an error in typesetting. Here is an example (org file):

===
* one
** two
*** three
**** four
***** five
****** six
******* seven
******** eight
===

This happens because nesting of enumerate environment in LaTeX is limited.
I think the program should export an LaTeX file that successfully makes
a PDF file even though the solution is dirty.

Emacs  : GNU Emacs 25.0.91.1 (x86_64-w64-mingw32)
 of 2016-02-14
Yes,I use Emacs on Windows.
Package: Org-mode version 8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @
c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)

Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

9661031 <9661031@gmail.com> writes:

> When you use a headline which is more than 7th level,the exported LaTeX file
> raises an error in typesetting. Here is an example (org file):
>
> ===
> * one
> ** two
> *** three
> **** four
> ***** five
> ****** six
> ******* seven
> ******** eight
> ===
>
> This happens because nesting of enumerate environment in LaTeX is limited.
> I think the program should export an LaTeX file that successfully makes
> a PDF file even though the solution is dirty.

Fair enough. Do you have a proposal for deeply nested headlines (or
items)?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

[Rasmus]

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Hello,
>
> 9661031 <9661031@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> When you use a headline which is more than 7th level,the exported LaTeX file
>> raises an error in typesetting. Here is an example (org file):
>>
>> ===
>> * one
>> ** two
>> *** three
>> **** four
>> ***** five
>> ****** six
>> ******* seven
>> ******** eight
>> ===
>>
>> This happens because nesting of enumerate environment in LaTeX is limited.
>> I think the program should export an LaTeX file that successfully makes
>> a PDF file even though the solution is dirty.
>
> Fair enough. Do you have a proposal for deeply nested headlines (or
> items)?

Use this header:

#+options: h:0
#+latex_header: \usepackage{enumitem}
#+latex_header: \setlistdepth{9}
#+latex_header: \setlist[enumerate]{label=(\arabic*)}


I don’t think we need to do anything.  If we wanted to support this we’d
probably need to load enumerate (which is not a bad package...).  We have
worse offenders of manual config.  Local TOCs spring to mind.
http://orgmode.org/org.html#fn-113

Rasmus

-- 
I almost cut my hair, it happened just the other day

Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:

> I don’t think we need to do anything.

Don't do anything? OK, done.

> If we wanted to support this we’d probably need to load enumerate
> (which is not a bad package...). We have worse offenders of manual
> config. Local TOCs spring to mind. http://orgmode.org/org.html#fn-113

Even if it isn't supported (I let you decide about it), It could be
documented somewhere, if only as a FAQ, or even in the LaTeX export
section of the manual.

WDYT?

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

[Nick Dokos]

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>
>> I don’t think we need to do anything.
>
> Don't do anything? OK, done.
>
>> If we wanted to support this we’d probably need to load enumerate
>> (which is not a bad package...). We have worse offenders of manual
>> config. Local TOCs spring to mind. http://orgmode.org/org.html#fn-113
>
> Even if it isn't supported (I let you decide about it), It could be
> documented somewhere, if only as a FAQ, or even in the LaTeX export
> section of the manual.
>

I suggest a footnote in (info "(org) Header and Sectioning")

--
Nick

Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

[Rasmus]

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>
>> I don’t think we need to do anything.
>
> Don't do anything? OK, done.
>
>> If we wanted to support this we’d probably need to load enumerate
>> (which is not a bad package...). We have worse offenders of manual
>> config. Local TOCs spring to mind. http://orgmode.org/org.html#fn-113
>
> Even if it isn't supported (I let you decide about it), It could be
> documented somewhere, if only as a FAQ, or even in the LaTeX export
> section of the manual.
>
> WDYT?

I would be happy with simply documenting this limitation and documenting a
solution, e.g. using enumitem one.  Enumitem is a wonderful package, but I
see no reason to add it as a standard package because of this.

Do any of you have a place in mind where we could add this to the manual?
How about the "Plain lists in LaTeX export".  I propose the following
change.  WDYT?  Can I commit/push?


modified   doc/org.texi
@@ -12297,12 +12297,30 @@ the @LaTeX{} @code{\includegraphics} macro will be commented out.
 
 Plain lists accept two optional attributes: @code{:environment} and
 @code{:options}.  The first one allows the use of a non-standard environment
-(e.g., @samp{inparaenum}).  The second one specifies additional arguments for
+(e.g., @samp{itemize*} of @samp{enumitem}).  The second one specifies additional arguments for
 that environment.
 
 @example
-#+ATTR_LATEX: :environment compactitem :options [$\circ$]
-- you need ``paralist'' package to reproduce this example.
+#+latex_header: \usepackage[inline]{enumitem}
+Some ways to say "Hello":
+#+ATTR_LATEX: :environment itemize* :options [label={}, itemjoin={,}, itemjoin*={, and}]
+- Hola
+- Bonjour
+- Guten Tag
+@end example
+
+By default, @LaTeX{} only support four level of nesting for lists.  If deeper
+nesting is needed, the @samp{enumitem} @LaTeX{} package could be employed, as
+shown in this example:
+@example
+\usepackage{enumitem}
+\renewlist{itemize}{itemize}{9}
+\setlist[itemize]{label=$\circ$}
+- one
+  - two
+    - three
+      - four
+        - five
 @end example
 

Rasmus

-- 
A page of history is worth a volume of logic

Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

[Rasmus]

Nick Dokos <ndokos@gmail.com> writes:

> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>>
>>> I don’t think we need to do anything.
>>
>> Don't do anything? OK, done.
>>
>>> If we wanted to support this we’d probably need to load enumerate
>>> (which is not a bad package...). We have worse offenders of manual
>>> config. Local TOCs spring to mind. http://orgmode.org/org.html#fn-113
>>
>> Even if it isn't supported (I let you decide about it), It could be
>> documented somewhere, if only as a FAQ, or even in the LaTeX export
>> section of the manual.
>>
>
> I suggest a footnote in (info "(org) Header and Sectioning")

Oh, I didn't see this Nick.  Do you prefer this location to the suggestion
I made in another post in this thread?

Thanks,
Rasmus

-- 
Bang bang

Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

[Nick Dokos]

Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:

> Nick Dokos <ndokos@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>>>
>>>> I don’t think we need to do anything.
>>>
>>> Don't do anything? OK, done.
>>>
>>>> If we wanted to support this we’d probably need to load enumerate
>>>> (which is not a bad package...). We have worse offenders of manual
>>>> config. Local TOCs spring to mind. http://orgmode.org/org.html#fn-113
>>>
>>> Even if it isn't supported (I let you decide about it), It could be
>>> documented somewhere, if only as a FAQ, or even in the LaTeX export
>>> section of the manual.
>>>
>>
>> I suggest a footnote in (info "(org) Header and Sectioning")
>
> Oh, I didn't see this Nick.  Do you prefer this location to the suggestion
> I made in another post in this thread?
>

Sorry, I missed your suggestion. If it has to be anywhere, I thought
what I suggested was the most natural place (I took a look at your
suggestion and I still have a slight preference for "Header and
Sectioning"), but I'm not doing the work: feel free to go whichever way
you think is best.

-- 
Nick

Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

[Rasmus]

Nick Dokos <ndokos@gmail.com> writes:

> Sorry, I missed your suggestion. If it has to be anywhere, I thought
> what I suggested was the most natural place (I took a look at your
> suggestion and I still have a slight preference for "Header and
> Sectioning"), but I'm not doing the work: feel free to go whichever way
> you think is best.

I read the copies sent to my email before checking to Gmane/NNTP.

Anyway, let's see what Nicolas or "9661031" prefers.

Rasmus

-- 
Need more coffee. . .

Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

[Marcin Borkowski]

On 2016-03-02, at 22:20, Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> wrote:

>> Fair enough. Do you have a proposal for deeply nested headlines (or
>> items)?
>
> Use this header:
>
> #+options: h:0
> #+latex_header: \usepackage{enumitem}
> #+latex_header: \setlistdepth{9}
> #+latex_header: \setlist[enumerate]{label=(\arabic*)}
>
>
> I don’t think we need to do anything.  If we wanted to support this we’d
> probably need to load enumerate (which is not a bad package...).  We have
> worse offenders of manual config.  Local TOCs spring to mind.
> http://orgmode.org/org.html#fn-113

I've just seen this thread, and decided to chime in.  I think that the
situation is fine: such deep nesting of lists should be _actively
discouraged_ IMHO.

While list support in LaTeX is IMO suboptimal (to say the least), and
enumitem is a must for me in most of my documents, four levels of
nesting is even too many (by a factor of 2).  My opinion is that base
LaTeX should limit the nesting to two levels, and a special package
(like enumitem) should be needed to cater for those really strange
documents that need more.  (Yes, they do exist, but are very rare
I believe.)

> Rasmus

Best,

-- 
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University

Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:

> I would be happy with simply documenting this limitation and documenting a
> solution, e.g. using enumitem one.  Enumitem is a wonderful package, but I
> see no reason to add it as a standard package because of this.
>
> Do any of you have a place in mind where we could add this to the manual?
> How about the "Plain lists in LaTeX export".  I propose the following
> change.  WDYT?  Can I commit/push?

> +@example
> +\usepackage{enumitem}
> +\renewlist{itemize}{itemize}{9}
> +\setlist[itemize]{label=$\circ$}

Shouldn't #+latex_header: be used? Or at least #+latex:.

Thank you for your work. It looks good, AFAIC.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

[Rasmus]

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>
>> I would be happy with simply documenting this limitation and documenting a
>> solution, e.g. using enumitem one.  Enumitem is a wonderful package, but I
>> see no reason to add it as a standard package because of this.
>>
>> Do any of you have a place in mind where we could add this to the manual?
>> How about the "Plain lists in LaTeX export".  I propose the following
>> change.  WDYT?  Can I commit/push?
>
>> +@example
>> +\usepackage{enumitem}
>> +\renewlist{itemize}{itemize}{9}
>> +\setlist[itemize]{label=$\circ$}
>
> Shouldn't #+latex_header: be used? Or at least #+latex:.

Yes they should.  Thanks.

Do you have opinions on this location versus the one proposed by Nick?

Rasmus

-- 
Hvor meget poesi tror De kommer ud af et glas isvand?

Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Hello,

Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:

> Do you have opinions on this location versus the one proposed by Nick?

I think your location is fine. It doesn't preclude adding a footnote in
"Header and sectioning", as suggested by Nick. WDYT?


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou

Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]

[9661031]

I'm sorry that I respond so late.

My idea is that as org-mode exports a plain text,org-mode assigns the
number to items having eight or more *s,
and the title starts from the number of the 8th depth.

So,I expect the exported .tex file is like that:
...
\section{one}
\label{sec-1}
\subsection{two}
\label{sec-1-1}
\subsubsection{three}
\label{sec-1-1-1}
\begin{enumerate}
\item four
\label{sec-1-1-1-1}
\begin{enumerate}
\item five
\label{sec-1-1-1-1-1}
\begin{enumerate}
\item six
\label{sec-1-1-1-1-1-1}
\begin{enumerate}
\item seven
\label{sec-1-1-1-1-1-1-1}

1. eight
      \label{sec-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1}

      1.1 nine
      \label{sec-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1}


\end{enumerate}
\end{enumerate}
\end{enumerate}
\end{enumerate}
...
Also,org-mode should export tex command to indent.

Sincerely,

2016-03-01 6:16 GMT+09:00 Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>:
> Hello,
>
> 9661031 <9661031@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> When you use a headline which is more than 7th level,the exported LaTeX file
>> raises an error in typesetting. Here is an example (org file):
>>
>> ===
>> * one
>> ** two
>> *** three
>> **** four
>> ***** five
>> ****** six
>> ******* seven
>> ******** eight
>> ===
>>
>> This happens because nesting of enumerate environment in LaTeX is limited.
>> I think the program should export an LaTeX file that successfully makes
>> a PDF file even though the solution is dirty.
>
> Fair enough. Do you have a proposal for deeply nested headlines (or
> items)?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou



-- 
Candlejackああ、あれは昔のアニメに出てくる・・・
おっと、宅配便かな、誰かが来たようだ