From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)] Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2016 20:07:31 +0100 Message-ID: <87oaarh1cc.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87io17qks4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d1rco9v1.fsf@gmx.us> <87povbw14p.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87vb52yys5.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ace8z-0001hG-C0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:15:10 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ace8w-0000kx-5t for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:15:09 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:50731) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ace8v-0000jc-V2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:15:06 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ace8u-0000bQ-9W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 20:15:04 +0100 Received: from 178.162.199.93 ([178.162.199.93]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 20:15:04 +0100 Received: from rasmus by 178.162.199.93 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 20:15:04 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nick Dokos writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> Hello, >> >> Rasmus writes: >> >>> I don’t think we need to do anything. >> >> Don't do anything? OK, done. >> >>> If we wanted to support this we’d probably need to load enumerate >>> (which is not a bad package...). We have worse offenders of manual >>> config. Local TOCs spring to mind. http://orgmode.org/org.html#fn-113 >> >> Even if it isn't supported (I let you decide about it), It could be >> documented somewhere, if only as a FAQ, or even in the LaTeX export >> section of the manual. >> > > I suggest a footnote in (info "(org) Header and Sectioning") Oh, I didn't see this Nick. Do you prefer this location to the suggestion I made in another post in this thread? Thanks, Rasmus -- Bang bang