From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)] Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:32:43 -0500 Message-ID: <874mcjs8pw.fsf@pierrot.dokosmarshall.org> References: <87io17qks4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d1rco9v1.fsf@gmx.us> <87povbw14p.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87vb52yys5.fsf@alphaville.usersys.redhat.com> <87oaarh1cc.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58830) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aceQK-0006rH-Ph for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:33:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aceQH-000457-Iv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:33:04 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:51419) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aceQH-000453-DN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 14:33:01 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aceQE-0000Ok-V3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 20:32:59 +0100 Received: from pool-74-104-158-160.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([74.104.158.160]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 20:32:58 +0100 Received: from ndokos by pool-74-104-158-160.bstnma.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Mar 2016 20:32:58 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Rasmus writes: > Nick Dokos writes: > >> Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> Rasmus writes: >>> >>>> I don’t think we need to do anything. >>> >>> Don't do anything? OK, done. >>> >>>> If we wanted to support this we’d probably need to load enumerate >>>> (which is not a bad package...). We have worse offenders of manual >>>> config. Local TOCs spring to mind. http://orgmode.org/org.html#fn-113 >>> >>> Even if it isn't supported (I let you decide about it), It could be >>> documented somewhere, if only as a FAQ, or even in the LaTeX export >>> section of the manual. >>> >> >> I suggest a footnote in (info "(org) Header and Sectioning") > > Oh, I didn't see this Nick. Do you prefer this location to the suggestion > I made in another post in this thread? > Sorry, I missed your suggestion. If it has to be anywhere, I thought what I suggested was the most natural place (I took a look at your suggestion and I still have a slight preference for "Header and Sectioning"), but I'm not doing the work: feel free to go whichever way you think is best. -- Nick