From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)] Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:35:26 +0100 Message-ID: <87si02s95t.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87io17qks4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d1rco9v1.fsf@gmx.us> <87povbw14p.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8760wzigdk.fsf@gmx.us> <871t7mzglq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37729) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acvJs-0007cB-9V for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 08:35:32 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acvJo-0003DN-Vp for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 08:35:32 -0500 Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:58211) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1acvJo-0003DF-Mw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 08:35:28 -0500 Received: from W530 ([62.80.108.15]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0M8edX-1ZhwmC3jwh-00wG1G for ; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 14:35:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: <871t7mzglq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Mon, 07 Mar 2016 12:12:49 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Rasmus writes: > >> I would be happy with simply documenting this limitation and documenting a >> solution, e.g. using enumitem one. Enumitem is a wonderful package, but I >> see no reason to add it as a standard package because of this. >> >> Do any of you have a place in mind where we could add this to the manual? >> How about the "Plain lists in LaTeX export". I propose the following >> change. WDYT? Can I commit/push? > >> +@example >> +\usepackage{enumitem} >> +\renewlist{itemize}{itemize}{9} >> +\setlist[itemize]{label=$\circ$} > > Shouldn't #+latex_header: be used? Or at least #+latex:. Yes they should. Thanks. Do you have opinions on this location versus the one proposed by Nick? Rasmus -- Hvor meget poesi tror De kommer ud af et glas isvand?