From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @
 c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 12:12:49 +0100
Message-ID: <871t7mzglq.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <CAL8hB42DYjxjE-GoBPNoStkREHBBmM-dv4QO7=wnNPFAJArcyg@mail.gmail.com>
	<87io17qks4.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87d1rco9v1.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87povbw14p.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <8760wzigdk.fsf@gmx.us>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60768)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1act3o-0001Kx-GD
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 06:10:49 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1act3l-0001qx-9M
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 06:10:48 -0500
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([217.70.183.195]:53850)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1act3l-0001qq-2i
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Mar 2016 06:10:45 -0500
In-Reply-To: <8760wzigdk.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Sun, 06 Mar
	2016 19:57:27 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:

> I would be happy with simply documenting this limitation and documenting a
> solution, e.g. using enumitem one.  Enumitem is a wonderful package, but I
> see no reason to add it as a standard package because of this.
>
> Do any of you have a place in mind where we could add this to the manual?
> How about the "Plain lists in LaTeX export".  I propose the following
> change.  WDYT?  Can I commit/push?

> +@example
> +\usepackage{enumitem}
> +\renewlist{itemize}{itemize}{9}
> +\setlist[itemize]{label=$\circ$}

Shouldn't #+latex_header: be used? Or at least #+latex:.

Thank you for your work. It looks good, AFAIC.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou