* Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]
@ 2016-02-28 15:31 9661031
2016-02-29 21:16 ` Nicolas Goaziou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: 9661031 @ 2016-02-28 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
--text follows this line--
Remember to cover the basics, that is, what you expected to happen and
what in fact did happen. You don't know how to make a good report? See
http://orgmode.org/manual/Feedback.html#Feedback
Your bug report will be posted to the Org-mode mailing list.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
When you use a headline which is more than 7th level,the exported LaTeX file
raises an error in typesetting. Here is an example (org file):
===
* one
** two
*** three
**** four
***** five
****** six
******* seven
******** eight
===
This happens because nesting of enumerate environment in LaTeX is limited.
I think the program should export an LaTeX file that successfully makes
a PDF file even though the solution is dirty.
Emacs : GNU Emacs 25.0.91.1 (x86_64-w64-mingw32)
of 2016-02-14
Yes,I use Emacs on Windows.
Package: Org-mode version 8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @
c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]
2016-02-28 15:31 Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)] 9661031
@ 2016-02-29 21:16 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-03-02 21:20 ` Rasmus
2016-03-14 11:05 ` 9661031
0 siblings, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Goaziou @ 2016-02-29 21:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9661031; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Hello,
9661031 <9661031@gmail.com> writes:
> When you use a headline which is more than 7th level,the exported LaTeX file
> raises an error in typesetting. Here is an example (org file):
>
> ===
> * one
> ** two
> *** three
> **** four
> ***** five
> ****** six
> ******* seven
> ******** eight
> ===
>
> This happens because nesting of enumerate environment in LaTeX is limited.
> I think the program should export an LaTeX file that successfully makes
> a PDF file even though the solution is dirty.
Fair enough. Do you have a proposal for deeply nested headlines (or
items)?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]
2016-02-29 21:16 ` Nicolas Goaziou
@ 2016-03-02 21:20 ` Rasmus
2016-03-04 0:13 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-03-06 19:57 ` Marcin Borkowski
2016-03-14 11:05 ` 9661031
1 sibling, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Rasmus @ 2016-03-02 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Hello,
>
> 9661031 <9661031@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> When you use a headline which is more than 7th level,the exported LaTeX file
>> raises an error in typesetting. Here is an example (org file):
>>
>> ===
>> * one
>> ** two
>> *** three
>> **** four
>> ***** five
>> ****** six
>> ******* seven
>> ******** eight
>> ===
>>
>> This happens because nesting of enumerate environment in LaTeX is limited.
>> I think the program should export an LaTeX file that successfully makes
>> a PDF file even though the solution is dirty.
>
> Fair enough. Do you have a proposal for deeply nested headlines (or
> items)?
Use this header:
#+options: h:0
#+latex_header: \usepackage{enumitem}
#+latex_header: \setlistdepth{9}
#+latex_header: \setlist[enumerate]{label=(\arabic*)}
I don’t think we need to do anything. If we wanted to support this we’d
probably need to load enumerate (which is not a bad package...). We have
worse offenders of manual config. Local TOCs spring to mind.
http://orgmode.org/org.html#fn-113
Rasmus
--
I almost cut my hair, it happened just the other day
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]
2016-03-02 21:20 ` Rasmus
@ 2016-03-04 0:13 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-03-04 16:48 ` Nick Dokos
2016-03-06 18:57 ` Rasmus
2016-03-06 19:57 ` Marcin Borkowski
1 sibling, 2 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Goaziou @ 2016-03-04 0:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rasmus; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Hello,
Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
> I don’t think we need to do anything.
Don't do anything? OK, done.
> If we wanted to support this we’d probably need to load enumerate
> (which is not a bad package...). We have worse offenders of manual
> config. Local TOCs spring to mind. http://orgmode.org/org.html#fn-113
Even if it isn't supported (I let you decide about it), It could be
documented somewhere, if only as a FAQ, or even in the LaTeX export
section of the manual.
WDYT?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]
2016-03-04 0:13 ` Nicolas Goaziou
@ 2016-03-04 16:48 ` Nick Dokos
2016-03-06 19:07 ` Rasmus
2016-03-06 18:57 ` Rasmus
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Nick Dokos @ 2016-03-04 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>
>> I don’t think we need to do anything.
>
> Don't do anything? OK, done.
>
>> If we wanted to support this we’d probably need to load enumerate
>> (which is not a bad package...). We have worse offenders of manual
>> config. Local TOCs spring to mind. http://orgmode.org/org.html#fn-113
>
> Even if it isn't supported (I let you decide about it), It could be
> documented somewhere, if only as a FAQ, or even in the LaTeX export
> section of the manual.
>
I suggest a footnote in (info "(org) Header and Sectioning")
--
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]
2016-03-04 16:48 ` Nick Dokos
@ 2016-03-06 19:07 ` Rasmus
2016-03-06 19:32 ` Nick Dokos
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Rasmus @ 2016-03-06 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Nick Dokos <ndokos@gmail.com> writes:
> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>>
>>> I don’t think we need to do anything.
>>
>> Don't do anything? OK, done.
>>
>>> If we wanted to support this we’d probably need to load enumerate
>>> (which is not a bad package...). We have worse offenders of manual
>>> config. Local TOCs spring to mind. http://orgmode.org/org.html#fn-113
>>
>> Even if it isn't supported (I let you decide about it), It could be
>> documented somewhere, if only as a FAQ, or even in the LaTeX export
>> section of the manual.
>>
>
> I suggest a footnote in (info "(org) Header and Sectioning")
Oh, I didn't see this Nick. Do you prefer this location to the suggestion
I made in another post in this thread?
Thanks,
Rasmus
--
Bang bang
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]
2016-03-06 19:07 ` Rasmus
@ 2016-03-06 19:32 ` Nick Dokos
2016-03-06 19:57 ` Rasmus
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Nick Dokos @ 2016-03-06 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
> Nick Dokos <ndokos@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>>>
>>>> I don’t think we need to do anything.
>>>
>>> Don't do anything? OK, done.
>>>
>>>> If we wanted to support this we’d probably need to load enumerate
>>>> (which is not a bad package...). We have worse offenders of manual
>>>> config. Local TOCs spring to mind. http://orgmode.org/org.html#fn-113
>>>
>>> Even if it isn't supported (I let you decide about it), It could be
>>> documented somewhere, if only as a FAQ, or even in the LaTeX export
>>> section of the manual.
>>>
>>
>> I suggest a footnote in (info "(org) Header and Sectioning")
>
> Oh, I didn't see this Nick. Do you prefer this location to the suggestion
> I made in another post in this thread?
>
Sorry, I missed your suggestion. If it has to be anywhere, I thought
what I suggested was the most natural place (I took a look at your
suggestion and I still have a slight preference for "Header and
Sectioning"), but I'm not doing the work: feel free to go whichever way
you think is best.
--
Nick
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]
2016-03-06 19:32 ` Nick Dokos
@ 2016-03-06 19:57 ` Rasmus
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Rasmus @ 2016-03-06 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Nick Dokos <ndokos@gmail.com> writes:
> Sorry, I missed your suggestion. If it has to be anywhere, I thought
> what I suggested was the most natural place (I took a look at your
> suggestion and I still have a slight preference for "Header and
> Sectioning"), but I'm not doing the work: feel free to go whichever way
> you think is best.
I read the copies sent to my email before checking to Gmane/NNTP.
Anyway, let's see what Nicolas or "9661031" prefers.
Rasmus
--
Need more coffee. . .
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]
2016-03-04 0:13 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-03-04 16:48 ` Nick Dokos
@ 2016-03-06 18:57 ` Rasmus
2016-03-07 11:12 ` Nicolas Goaziou
1 sibling, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Rasmus @ 2016-03-06 18:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>
>> I don’t think we need to do anything.
>
> Don't do anything? OK, done.
>
>> If we wanted to support this we’d probably need to load enumerate
>> (which is not a bad package...). We have worse offenders of manual
>> config. Local TOCs spring to mind. http://orgmode.org/org.html#fn-113
>
> Even if it isn't supported (I let you decide about it), It could be
> documented somewhere, if only as a FAQ, or even in the LaTeX export
> section of the manual.
>
> WDYT?
I would be happy with simply documenting this limitation and documenting a
solution, e.g. using enumitem one. Enumitem is a wonderful package, but I
see no reason to add it as a standard package because of this.
Do any of you have a place in mind where we could add this to the manual?
How about the "Plain lists in LaTeX export". I propose the following
change. WDYT? Can I commit/push?
modified doc/org.texi
@@ -12297,12 +12297,30 @@ the @LaTeX{} @code{\includegraphics} macro will be commented out.
Plain lists accept two optional attributes: @code{:environment} and
@code{:options}. The first one allows the use of a non-standard environment
-(e.g., @samp{inparaenum}). The second one specifies additional arguments for
+(e.g., @samp{itemize*} of @samp{enumitem}). The second one specifies additional arguments for
that environment.
@example
-#+ATTR_LATEX: :environment compactitem :options [$\circ$]
-- you need ``paralist'' package to reproduce this example.
+#+latex_header: \usepackage[inline]{enumitem}
+Some ways to say "Hello":
+#+ATTR_LATEX: :environment itemize* :options [label={}, itemjoin={,}, itemjoin*={, and}]
+- Hola
+- Bonjour
+- Guten Tag
+@end example
+
+By default, @LaTeX{} only support four level of nesting for lists. If deeper
+nesting is needed, the @samp{enumitem} @LaTeX{} package could be employed, as
+shown in this example:
+@example
+\usepackage{enumitem}
+\renewlist{itemize}{itemize}{9}
+\setlist[itemize]{label=$\circ$}
+- one
+ - two
+ - three
+ - four
+ - five
@end example
Rasmus
--
A page of history is worth a volume of logic
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]
2016-03-06 18:57 ` Rasmus
@ 2016-03-07 11:12 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-03-07 13:35 ` Rasmus
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Goaziou @ 2016-03-07 11:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rasmus; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Hello,
Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
> I would be happy with simply documenting this limitation and documenting a
> solution, e.g. using enumitem one. Enumitem is a wonderful package, but I
> see no reason to add it as a standard package because of this.
>
> Do any of you have a place in mind where we could add this to the manual?
> How about the "Plain lists in LaTeX export". I propose the following
> change. WDYT? Can I commit/push?
> +@example
> +\usepackage{enumitem}
> +\renewlist{itemize}{itemize}{9}
> +\setlist[itemize]{label=$\circ$}
Shouldn't #+latex_header: be used? Or at least #+latex:.
Thank you for your work. It looks good, AFAIC.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]
2016-03-07 11:12 ` Nicolas Goaziou
@ 2016-03-07 13:35 ` Rasmus
2016-03-07 21:51 ` Nicolas Goaziou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 14+ messages in thread
From: Rasmus @ 2016-03-07 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
>
>> I would be happy with simply documenting this limitation and documenting a
>> solution, e.g. using enumitem one. Enumitem is a wonderful package, but I
>> see no reason to add it as a standard package because of this.
>>
>> Do any of you have a place in mind where we could add this to the manual?
>> How about the "Plain lists in LaTeX export". I propose the following
>> change. WDYT? Can I commit/push?
>
>> +@example
>> +\usepackage{enumitem}
>> +\renewlist{itemize}{itemize}{9}
>> +\setlist[itemize]{label=$\circ$}
>
> Shouldn't #+latex_header: be used? Or at least #+latex:.
Yes they should. Thanks.
Do you have opinions on this location versus the one proposed by Nick?
Rasmus
--
Hvor meget poesi tror De kommer ud af et glas isvand?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]
2016-03-07 13:35 ` Rasmus
@ 2016-03-07 21:51 ` Nicolas Goaziou
0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Goaziou @ 2016-03-07 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rasmus; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Hello,
Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> writes:
> Do you have opinions on this location versus the one proposed by Nick?
I think your location is fine. It doesn't preclude adding a footnote in
"Header and sectioning", as suggested by Nick. WDYT?
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]
2016-03-02 21:20 ` Rasmus
2016-03-04 0:13 ` Nicolas Goaziou
@ 2016-03-06 19:57 ` Marcin Borkowski
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Marcin Borkowski @ 2016-03-06 19:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rasmus; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
On 2016-03-02, at 22:20, Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us> wrote:
>> Fair enough. Do you have a proposal for deeply nested headlines (or
>> items)?
>
> Use this header:
>
> #+options: h:0
> #+latex_header: \usepackage{enumitem}
> #+latex_header: \setlistdepth{9}
> #+latex_header: \setlist[enumerate]{label=(\arabic*)}
>
>
> I don’t think we need to do anything. If we wanted to support this we’d
> probably need to load enumerate (which is not a bad package...). We have
> worse offenders of manual config. Local TOCs spring to mind.
> http://orgmode.org/org.html#fn-113
I've just seen this thread, and decided to chime in. I think that the
situation is fine: such deep nesting of lists should be _actively
discouraged_ IMHO.
While list support in LaTeX is IMO suboptimal (to say the least), and
enumitem is a must for me in most of my documents, four levels of
nesting is even too many (by a factor of 2). My opinion is that base
LaTeX should limit the nesting to two levels, and a special package
(like enumitem) should be needed to cater for those really strange
documents that need more. (Yes, they do exist, but are very rare
I believe.)
> Rasmus
Best,
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://octd.wmi.amu.edu.pl/en/Marcin_Borkowski
Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science
Adam Mickiewicz University
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
* Re: Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)]
2016-02-29 21:16 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-03-02 21:20 ` Rasmus
@ 2016-03-14 11:05 ` 9661031
1 sibling, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: 9661031 @ 2016-03-14 11:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 9661031, emacs-orgmode
I'm sorry that I respond so late.
My idea is that as org-mode exports a plain text,org-mode assigns the
number to items having eight or more *s,
and the title starts from the number of the 8th depth.
So,I expect the exported .tex file is like that:
...
\section{one}
\label{sec-1}
\subsection{two}
\label{sec-1-1}
\subsubsection{three}
\label{sec-1-1-1}
\begin{enumerate}
\item four
\label{sec-1-1-1-1}
\begin{enumerate}
\item five
\label{sec-1-1-1-1-1}
\begin{enumerate}
\item six
\label{sec-1-1-1-1-1-1}
\begin{enumerate}
\item seven
\label{sec-1-1-1-1-1-1-1}
1. eight
\label{sec-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1}
1.1 nine
\label{sec-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1-1}
\end{enumerate}
\end{enumerate}
\end{enumerate}
\end{enumerate}
...
Also,org-mode should export tex command to indent.
Sincerely,
2016-03-01 6:16 GMT+09:00 Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>:
> Hello,
>
> 9661031 <9661031@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> When you use a headline which is more than 7th level,the exported LaTeX file
>> raises an error in typesetting. Here is an example (org file):
>>
>> ===
>> * one
>> ** two
>> *** three
>> **** four
>> ***** five
>> ****** six
>> ******* seven
>> ******** eight
>> ===
>>
>> This happens because nesting of enumerate environment in LaTeX is limited.
>> I think the program should export an LaTeX file that successfully makes
>> a PDF file even though the solution is dirty.
>
> Fair enough. Do you have a proposal for deeply nested headlines (or
> items)?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Nicolas Goaziou
--
Candlejackああ、あれは昔のアニメに出てくる・・・
おっと、宅配便かな、誰かが来たようだ
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-03-14 11:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-28 15:31 Bug: incorrect export for LaTeX [8.2.10 (release_8.2.10 @ c:/emacs25-91/share/emacs/25.0.91/lisp/org/)] 9661031
2016-02-29 21:16 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-03-02 21:20 ` Rasmus
2016-03-04 0:13 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-03-04 16:48 ` Nick Dokos
2016-03-06 19:07 ` Rasmus
2016-03-06 19:32 ` Nick Dokos
2016-03-06 19:57 ` Rasmus
2016-03-06 18:57 ` Rasmus
2016-03-07 11:12 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-03-07 13:35 ` Rasmus
2016-03-07 21:51 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2016-03-06 19:57 ` Marcin Borkowski
2016-03-14 11:05 ` 9661031
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).