From: Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>
To: Sebastien Vauban
<public-sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/iDocfnWg@plane.gmane.org>
Cc: public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Proposal for rebindings in Org 8.3
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 14:30:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8761oruk2f.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86r47fnolk.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Fri, 07 Feb 2014 12:34:15 +0100")
Thanks for your feedback.
"Sebastien Vauban" <sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/iDocfnWg@public.gmane.org>
writes:
>> - use C-c < for selecting the whole subtree, which is consistent
>> with the use of `<' as a speedy command for doing the same.
>
> You put the finger on one important note to me: that speed commands are
> "the same" as their longer counterpart. It should be good if all of
> them could be obtainable by adding "C-c C-" in front of the speed
> command.
I think it goes in the opposite direction: if a command is bound to
C-c KEY or C-c C-KEY then KEY should be used as a speed command.
> With that focus in mind, I find `C-c x' not a good one (for checkboxes);
> though, in that case, speed commands don't come into play.
The mnemonic here is: `x' reminds me of [x] -- let's see if something
better can be done.
> But I find it
> too different from the `C-c C-' construct used for the others?
I wanted to keep it close to C-c #, and use only C-c KEY.
>> Let me know how you feel about such move in general and each rebinding
>> in particular. We are not forced to solve them all at once.
>
> Globally, it's fine!
>
> Last remark about `C-c <' which I find not good:
>
> - `<' in used for filtering categories in the agenda,
Categories are (most often) attached to a subtree.
When you hit the `<' speed command on this subtree then display
the agenda, you don't need to filter by category with `<' since
the narrowing already filters (by category) for you.
That's actually one of the reason for which I propose this key.
> - semantically, what `C-c @' does is a `C-x h' limited to a subtree;
> maybe there could be something inspiring similar to `C-x h'? Maybe
> `C-u C-x h'?
The way to get the same behavior than `C-c @' is `C-c C-^ M-h'.
M-h is very very handy, and probably not known enough!
--
Bastien
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-07 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-07 10:32 [RFC] Proposal for rebindings in Org 8.3 Bastien
2014-02-07 11:34 ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-02-07 13:30 ` Bastien [this message]
2014-02-07 14:55 ` Michael Brand
2014-02-08 18:13 ` Bastien
2014-02-07 15:56 ` Nick Dokos
2014-02-07 16:44 ` Rasmus
2014-02-08 18:13 ` Bastien
2014-02-07 19:06 ` Samuel Wales
2014-02-08 18:13 ` Bastien
2014-02-08 20:40 ` Samuel Wales
2014-02-08 20:42 ` Samuel Wales
2014-02-08 22:34 ` Bastien
2014-02-08 22:58 ` Samuel Wales
2014-02-09 8:01 ` Bastien
2014-02-09 10:26 ` Achim Gratz
2014-02-09 9:21 ` Assumptions on user's environment (was: [RFC] Proposal for rebindings in Org 8.3) Karl Voit
2014-02-09 9:51 ` Assumptions on user's environment Bastien
2014-02-09 10:09 ` Karl Voit
2014-02-09 12:29 ` Rasmus
2014-02-09 17:43 ` Karl Voit
2014-02-09 19:43 ` Assumptions on user's environment (was: [RFC] Proposal for rebindings in Org 8.3) Samuel Wales
2014-02-09 19:51 ` Assumptions on user's environment Bastien
2014-02-09 20:13 ` Samuel Wales
2014-02-09 20:27 ` Achim Gratz
2014-02-09 21:31 ` Karl Voit
2014-02-10 8:55 ` Bastien
2014-02-10 8:55 ` Bastien
2014-02-10 11:19 ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-02-10 19:29 ` Samuel Wales
2014-02-12 17:09 ` Karl Voit
2014-02-08 18:13 ` [RFC] Proposal for rebindings in Org 8.3 Bastien
2014-02-10 0:20 ` Thomas S. Dye
2014-02-10 8:40 ` Bastien
2014-02-10 17:27 ` Achim Gratz
2014-02-10 23:22 ` terminal emulators (was: Re: Proposal for rebindings in Org 8.3) Gregor Zattler
2014-02-11 13:58 ` terminal emulators Brett Viren
2014-02-11 18:35 ` Achim Gratz
2014-02-11 20:33 ` Gregor Zattler
2014-02-12 20:18 ` Achim Gratz
2014-03-10 18:07 ` [RFC] Proposal for rebindings in Org 8.3 Greg Troxel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-09 20:01 Tim O'Callaghan
2014-02-09 22:48 ` Nick Dokos
2014-02-10 8:43 ` Bastien
2014-02-10 9:28 ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-02-10 10:21 ` Bastien
2014-02-10 11:18 ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-02-11 20:58 ` Bastien
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8761oruk2f.fsf@bzg.ath.cx \
--to=bzg@gnu.org \
--cc=public-emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@plane.gmane.org \
--cc=public-sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/iDocfnWg@plane.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).