* Can version 6.08 work in Emacs 21?
@ 2008-10-09 10:26 Eric S Fraga
2008-10-09 14:35 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric S Fraga @ 2008-10-09 10:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Although I use org mode (and love it!) on most of my systems, I have
been using version 4.74 for a long time. I just upgraded to version
6.08 which works perfectly fine on most of my systems and I really
appreciate all the improvements and new features. However, my office
desktop, which acts as a server for many of my projects, is running
Debian stable (etch). Version 6.08 does not appear to work well at
all, especially agenda views and links with the Emacs diary mode.
Is attempting to get org mode 6.08 working with Emacs 21 worthwhile,
especially given that Debian stable will soon be replaced by lenny
(which has Emacs 22)?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions or advice!
--
Eric S Fraga, UCL
BF >++++++++++[>++++++++++>+++++++++++[<]>-]>++.>++++.<-----.++++++.------.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Can version 6.08 work in Emacs 21?
2008-10-09 10:26 Can version 6.08 work in Emacs 21? Eric S Fraga
@ 2008-10-09 14:35 ` Carsten Dominik
2008-10-10 8:01 ` Eric S Fraga
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2008-10-09 14:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: e.fraga; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Hi Eric,
I thought hat Org *does* work reasonably well with Emacs 21, but
maybe I am wrong?
Anyway, I will take no more steps to make it work better with Emacs
21, Emacs 22 has been out long enough so that people can be expected
to run Emacs 22.
- Carsten
On Oct 9, 2008, at 12:26 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
> Although I use org mode (and love it!) on most of my systems, I have
> been using version 4.74 for a long time. I just upgraded to version
> 6.08 which works perfectly fine on most of my systems and I really
> appreciate all the improvements and new features. However, my office
> desktop, which acts as a server for many of my projects, is running
> Debian stable (etch). Version 6.08 does not appear to work well at
> all, especially agenda views and links with the Emacs diary mode.
>
> Is attempting to get org mode 6.08 working with Emacs 21 worthwhile,
> especially given that Debian stable will soon be replaced by lenny
> (which has Emacs 22)?
>
> Thanks in advance for any suggestions or advice!
>
> --
> Eric S Fraga, UCL
> BF >++++++++++[>++++++++++>+++++++++++[<]>-]>++.>++++.<-----.+++++
> +.------.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Can version 6.08 work in Emacs 21?
2008-10-09 14:35 ` Carsten Dominik
@ 2008-10-10 8:01 ` Eric S Fraga
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric S Fraga @ 2008-10-10 8:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
On 2008-10-09, Carsten Dominik <dominik@uva.nl> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> I thought hat Org *does* work reasonably well with Emacs 21, but
> maybe I am wrong?
After some very helpful discussion with Carsten, I found that the
problem was mine (blush!) in that I had been using .elc files compiled
with Emacs 22 on Emacs 21.
Apologies for the noise.
--
Eric S Fraga, UCL
BF >++++++++++[>++++++++++>+++++++++++[<]>-]>++.>++++.<-----.++++++.------.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-10 9:08 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-09 10:26 Can version 6.08 work in Emacs 21? Eric S Fraga
2008-10-09 14:35 ` Carsten Dominik
2008-10-10 8:01 ` Eric S Fraga
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).