From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric S Fraga Subject: Re: Can version 6.08 work in Emacs 21? Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:01:31 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KoDyo-0003EB-ED for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:08:14 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KoDym-0003Ci-Vv for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:08:14 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58435 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KoDym-0003CW-Lf for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:08:12 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:40835 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KoDyn-0004AK-7c for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 05:08:13 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1KoDyi-0003yV-K7 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:08:08 +0000 Received: from dip018.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk ([128.40.228.117]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:08:08 +0000 Received: from e.fraga by dip018.chemeng.ucl.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:08:08 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 2008-10-09, Carsten Dominik wrote: > Hi Eric, > > I thought hat Org *does* work reasonably well with Emacs 21, but > maybe I am wrong? After some very helpful discussion with Carsten, I found that the problem was mine (blush!) in that I had been using .elc files compiled with Emacs 22 on Emacs 21. Apologies for the noise. -- Eric S Fraga, UCL BF >++++++++++[>++++++++++>+++++++++++[<]>-]>++.>++++.<-----.++++++.------.