From: Russell Adams <RLAdams@AdamsInfoServ.Com> To: firstname.lastname@example.org, Gerry Agbobada <email@example.com> Subject: Re: Emacs as an Org LSP server Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2020 20:41:17 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201214194117.GI6352@maokai> (raw) In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 02:26:30AM +0800, TEC wrote: > This simply isn't what's happening here. I'm just starting work on my > own little project to give non-emacs people a taste of Org's > capabilities. I didn't think the way I spend my time was such a matter > of public concern to the Emacs community. I don't think you're being criticized for how you choose to spend your time. It's certainly an interesting coding project to try and do. I've been very impressed with your ability. For instance discussing the Latex templates you made and your updates to the website. Please don't think this is a personal beef with you, or dismissive of your talents. Your original post to the list on this topic was to solicit collaboration from other Org users regarding making an LSP server for Org, and that's where the disagreement comes from. Clearly there are strong opinions over the direction, degrees of freedom, and potential misuse of LSP as a technology. The issue regarding MS's involvement in the LSP standard isn't your problem, nor under your control. I'd suggest you just accidentally stepped into "it". You clearly have valid reasons to like LSP, and I admire many of the goals as well. I (and others) appear to disagree with the LSP project implementation. From my other email, I see this thread as discussing whether the Emacs community supports spending time on competing technologies, or whether that time is better focused on improving Emacs and Org. I think the criticism has been to the effect that there are a variety of reasons not to support spending community time on competing technologies like LSP without significant consideration. That additional consideration is likely larger than us both, and could up being a project level governance concern and even a legal concern. In summary I'm positive over you doing a proof of concept code to satisfy yourself, but I share the concerns over it being a larger project. ------------------------------------------------------------------ Russell Adams RLAdams@AdamsInfoServ.com PGP Key ID: 0x1160DCB3 http://www.adamsinfoserv.com/ Fingerprint: 1723 D8CA 4280 1EC9 557F 66E8 1154 E018 1160 DCB3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-14 19:42 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-11-02 15:05 TEC 2020-12-13 10:41 ` TEC 2020-12-13 11:05 ` Bill Burdick 2020-12-13 14:36 ` Jean Louis 2020-12-13 17:33 ` TEC 2020-12-13 20:23 ` Jean Louis 2020-12-14 0:54 ` Gerry Agbobada 2020-12-14 1:04 ` Tim Cross 2020-12-14 1:10 ` George Mauer 2020-12-14 11:41 ` Neil Jerram 2020-12-14 15:25 ` TEC 2020-12-14 15:46 ` Neil Jerram 2020-12-14 15:55 ` TEC 2020-12-14 17:02 ` Jean Louis 2020-12-14 17:08 ` TEC 2020-12-14 18:05 ` Russell Adams 2020-12-14 18:12 ` TEC 2020-12-14 19:16 ` Russell Adams 2020-12-14 20:18 ` Jean Louis 2020-12-14 21:34 ` Tim Cross 2020-12-14 20:20 ` Tim Cross 2020-12-14 21:45 ` Tom Gillespie 2020-12-14 18:39 ` LSP is Microsoft's patented protocol - " Jean Louis 2020-12-14 18:44 ` TEC 2020-12-14 18:52 ` Jean Louis 2020-12-15 5:47 ` Richard Stallman 2020-12-15 5:50 ` Jean Louis 2020-12-15 6:09 ` Christopher Dimech 2020-12-15 6:25 ` Jean Louis 2020-12-15 6:51 ` Christopher Dimech 2020-12-16 5:38 ` Richard Stallman 2020-12-14 17:27 ` Gerry Agbobada 2020-12-14 18:16 ` Jean Louis 2020-12-14 18:26 ` TEC 2020-12-14 18:50 ` Jean Louis 2020-12-14 19:41 ` Russell Adams [this message] 2020-12-14 18:51 ` Bastien 2020-12-15 8:51 ` Bill Burdick 2020-12-14 19:50 ` Tim Cross 2020-12-14 21:51 ` Jean Louis 2020-12-14 22:35 ` Dominik Schrempf 2020-12-14 23:36 ` Jean Louis 2020-12-14 17:22 ` Neil Jerram 2020-12-14 17:24 ` TEC 2020-12-14 17:57 ` Neil Jerram 2020-12-14 18:04 ` TEC 2020-12-14 17:39 ` Russell Adams 2020-12-14 17:45 ` TEC 2020-12-16 11:49 ` Bastien
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style List information: https://www.orgmode.org/ * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20201214194117.GI6352@maokai \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --subject='Re: Emacs as an Org LSP server' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).