emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make test: Make failure results more verbose
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2022 20:06:44 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <srugt5$h10$1@ciao.gmane.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <srug31$t9s$1@ciao.gmane.io>

A couple of additional remarks.

On 15/01/2022 19:52, Max Nikulin wrote:
> On 02/01/2022 20:12, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> 
>> Subject: [PATCH] make test: Make failure results more verbose
> 
> At first it was not clear to me that only *summary* of test results is 
> affected.

Should not the variable be named BTEST_ERT_VERBOSE_SUMMARY instead of 
just BTEST_ERT_VERBOSE due to this reason?

>>>> I am unsure if this line or local.mk has priority. I am unsure the the
>>>> following is better as well.
>>>> BTEST_ERT_VERBOSE ?= yes
>>>
>>> I am not very familiar with Makefile conventions. Just followed the
>>> existing settings in the same file. All other BTEST_ERT_* settings just
>>> use "=".

I have found an example when "?=" is better. It is possible to export 
BTEST_ERT_VERBOSE from shell (or set in in the environment of continuous 
integration runner) and the value will not be overridden. Quick tests 
shell equivalent:

BTEST_ERT_VERBOSE= make test

currently it have to be written only as

make test-dirty BTEST_ERT_VERBOSE=



  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-15 13:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-02 13:12 Ihor Radchenko
2022-01-03  5:35 ` Max Nikulin
2022-01-07 15:04   ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-01-11 16:46     ` Max Nikulin
2022-01-15 12:52       ` Max Nikulin
2022-01-15 13:06         ` Max Nikulin [this message]
2022-01-15 15:58           ` Max Nikulin
2022-01-21 13:33             ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-01-21 15:01               ` Max Nikulin
2022-01-23 13:31                 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-01-21 13:31         ` Ihor Radchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='srugt5$h10$1@ciao.gmane.io' \
    --to=manikulin@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] make test: Make failure results more verbose' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).