Re: Some projects

[Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com>]

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Thomas S. Dye <tsd@tsdye.com> writes:
>
>> Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:
>>
>>> The full proposal was at
>>> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/97468> but it didn't get
>>> much positive feedback. Therefore I suggested a simplified version, with
>>> a single author.
>>
>> In my case, the lack of positive feedback was "too much org, too little
>> time".
>>
>> The original version, which includes the author Fabrice mentioned, seems
>> superior to me.  It potentially eases collaboration and also configuring
>> alternate versions of the same document.
>>
>> I'm not clear about affiliated keyword for source code blocks.  Would
>> tangling honor  #+OPTIONS:  <at> :student1?
>
> The limitation is that you can only replace the code block as a whole,
> so with
>
>   #+annotate: bugfix
>   #+name: bikeshed
>   #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>   (paint 'bikeshed blue)
>   #+end_src
>
>   * Annotations
>
>   [@:bugfig:me]
>   # You're clearly wrong
>   #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>   (pain 'bikeshed green)
>   #+end_src
>
> when using
>
>   #+OPTIONS: @:me
>
> body becomes
>
>   #+name: bikeshed
>   #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>   (paint 'bikeshed green)
>   #+end_src

And also,

#+name: baz
#+begin_src emacs-lisp :noweb yes
(some code)
<<bikeshed>>
(other code)
#+end_src

so the various :noweb options, including evaluation of baz in the Org
mode buffer, honor #+OPTIONS: @:me?

All the best,
Tom

-- 
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com