Re: [PATCH] Fontification for inline src blocks

[Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com>]

Timothy <tecosaur@gmail.com> writes:

>>>> I do not like abusing prettify-symbols-mode. What if it is not enabled?
>
> If you know of another way of accomplishing text-replacement which
> changes back when the cursor enters the region, please let me know.

cursor-sensor-mode

>>> Ah, it does it anyway at the moment.
>>
>> Hmm. You are right. You are calling compose-region directly. Note, that
>> you do not add 'decompose-region function for automatic region
>> destruction (see help:pretty-symbol-pattern-to-keyword).
>
> Isn't the same effect achieved by the remove-list-of-text-properties call?

It is. Though only while font-lock is active. Now, looking at
prettify-symbols-mode code, it does not seem to be necessary when
font-locking is set correctly.

>> If I understand correctly (I did not really install your patch), if you have
>> composed region, disable font-lock, and try to edit the region, edits
>> will be invisible. Or imagine setting org-inline-src-prettify-results to
>> nil in already fontified buffer.
>
> I just tried "setting org-inline-src-prettify-results to nil in already
> fontified buffer." and the region just decomposed and stayed that way.

Did you also have prettify-symbols-mode disabled?

>> Also, you may find help:font-lock-extra-managed-props useful. That way,
>> you will not have to manually remove composition and other non-standard
>> properties during fontification
>
> Hmmm, from a look I can't tell exactly how these are "managed". Are they
> just removed when a region is processed?

They are removed just before the region is processed and they are
removed when font-lock-mode is disabled. On the other hand, it will not
be possible to set the managed properties directly (try setting font
using a direct M-: command in a buffer with font-lock enabled).

>> P.S. Nitpick: You do not need to run fontification in while loops. Just
>> fontifying next match before limit should be enough. Font-lock will call
>> the function again if needed.
>
> I'm guessing for this to work I'd need to return the final char
> fortified? Or is the moving of point enough?
>
> Maybe related - I've noticed this doesn't seem to work with multiple
> src_ blocks per line, might you have any insight here?

As I understand, the fontificatoin function must behave like
re-search-forward. From font-lock-keywords docstring:

>>> ... MATCHER can be either the regexp to search for, or the function
>>> name to call to make the search (called with one argument, the limit
>>> of the search; it should return non-nil, move point, and set
>>> `match-data' appropriately if it succeeds; like `re-search-forward'
>>> would).

Best,
Ihor