From: Timothy <email@example.com> To: Ihor Radchenko <firstname.lastname@example.org> Cc: Tom Gillespie <email@example.com>, org-mode-email <firstname.lastname@example.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fontification for inline src blocks Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 00:39:32 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <email@example.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <87im3odk35.fsf@localhost> Thank you for the detailed feedback :) Ihor Radchenko <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: > Timothy <email@example.com> writes: > >>> I do not like abusing prettify-symbols-mode. What if it is not enabled? If you know of another way of accomplishing text-replacement which changes back when the cursor enters the region, please let me know. >> Ah, it does it anyway at the moment. > > Hmm. You are right. You are calling compose-region directly. Note, that > you do not add 'decompose-region function for automatic region > destruction (see help:pretty-symbol-pattern-to-keyword). Isn't the same effect achieved by the remove-list-of-text-properties call? > If I understand correctly (I did not really install your patch), if you have > composed region, disable font-lock, and try to edit the region, edits > will be invisible. Or imagine setting org-inline-src-prettify-results to > nil in already fontified buffer. I just tried "setting org-inline-src-prettify-results to nil in already fontified buffer." and the region just decomposed and stayed that way. > Also, you may find help:font-lock-extra-managed-props useful. That way, > you will not have to manually remove composition and other non-standard > properties during fontification Hmmm, from a look I can't tell exactly how these are "managed". Are they just removed when a region is processed? > why are you even removing 'face? It should be already done by font-lock). I tried removing such calls, and everything still worked, so this is no longer done. >>> What will happen if user toggles prettify-symbols-mode in Org buffer? >> >> This seems to be toggled nicely by prettify-symbols-mode too. > > I would not expect it to. Why would prettify-symbols-mode interfere with > Org mode native fontification if it is not strictly necessary? Well, I guess this is a by-product of using prettify-symbols-start/end, see my note at the start of this email about not being aware of anything else. > P.S. Nitpick: You do not need to run fontification in while loops. Just > fontifying next match before limit should be enough. Font-lock will call > the function again if needed. I'm guessing for this to work I'd need to return the final char fortified? Or is the moving of point enough? Maybe related - I've noticed this doesn't seem to work with multiple src_ blocks per line, might you have any insight here? Thanks, Timothy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-12 16:40 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-03-31 15:00 Timothy 2021-04-28 7:14 ` Timothy 2021-05-02 20:17 ` Timothy 2021-05-02 20:57 ` Tom Gillespie 2021-05-02 21:03 ` Timothy 2021-05-02 21:13 ` Tom Gillespie 2021-05-02 23:54 ` Tom Gillespie 2021-05-03 3:29 ` Timothy 2021-05-12 11:15 ` Timothy 2021-05-12 14:24 ` Ihor Radchenko 2021-05-12 14:47 ` Timothy 2021-05-12 15:53 ` Ihor Radchenko 2021-05-12 16:39 ` Timothy [this message] 2021-05-13 2:38 ` Tim Cross 2021-05-13 5:31 ` Ihor Radchenko 2021-05-18 12:06 ` Sébastien Miquel 2021-05-18 13:34 ` Timothy 2021-05-18 14:36 ` Sébastien Miquel 2021-04-29 22:59 ` TRS-80 2021-10-03 7:14 ` Ihor Radchenko 2021-10-03 7:16 ` Timothy 2021-10-03 9:09 ` Ihor Radchenko 2021-10-03 9:22 ` Timothy 2021-10-04 20:02 ` Protesilaos Stavrou 2021-11-21 14:09 ` Timothy 2021-11-22 11:52 ` Timothy 2021-11-22 12:23 ` Ihor Radchenko 2021-11-22 13:43 ` Timothy 2021-11-22 14:35 ` Ihor Radchenko 2021-11-22 14:37 ` Timothy 2021-11-23 13:30 ` Ihor Radchenko 2021-11-29 19:21 ` Timothy 2021-11-30 11:44 ` Timothy 2021-11-30 12:45 ` Sébastien Miquel 2021-11-30 12:46 ` Timothy 2021-11-30 12:21 ` Ihor Radchenko 2021-12-02 12:53 ` Eric S Fraga 2021-12-02 13:57 ` Faces for inline src blocks (was: [PATCH] Fontification for inline src blocks) Timothy 2021-12-02 15:52 ` Faces for inline src blocks Eric S Fraga 2021-12-02 15:56 ` Timothy 2021-12-02 16:15 ` Eric S Fraga 2021-11-23 10:45 ` [PATCH] Fontification " Vitaly Ankh 2021-11-23 13:45 ` Vitaly Ankh
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style List information: https://www.orgmode.org/ * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --email@example.com \ --firstname.lastname@example.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH] Fontification for inline src blocks' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox: https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).