emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Timothy <tecosaur@gmail.com>
To: Tom Gillespie <tgbugs@gmail.com>
Cc: org-mode-email <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fontification for inline src blocks
Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 05:03:59 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r1iog85d.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+G3_PMta3Sgx-Hdz8h4=Giftk7TBsfB9TkftCFHfStFuJvsrQ@mail.gmail.com>


Thanks for trying this!

Tom Gillespie <tgbugs@gmail.com> writes:

> Hi Timothy,
>    It seems to work more or less as expected. A few comments below. Best,
> Tom
>
> 1. I think there needs to be a function to toggle
> org-inline-src-prettify-results as there is e.g. for hyperlinks. I was
> quite confused by the prettified results.

I see. I imagine the expected behaviour of such a function would be to
toggle org-inline-src-prettify-results and redisplay?

> 2. I'm also not sure that this approach to prettify is a good idea.
> There are issues with unexpected killing/yanking and basic navigation
> behavior of the prettified text which seem worse than the already
> troublesome issues with hyperlinks. I'm not sure we can do anything
> about this though?

If there is something that can be done, I'd love to hear about it. I'm
no aware of anything though.

> 3. I'm not sure about the default choice for prettified delimiters. I
> see there is already a way to customize the delimiters by providing a
> cons. I think a default value of '("" . "") might be a better choice
> since ⟨ and ⟩ being hardcoded seems like it introduces completely
> alien characters. Going with empty strings also seems consistent with
> the behavior for hyperlinks.

Hmmm, yes. Perhaps something else would make for a better default.
I'm open to suggestions on this, I just didn't personally like any of
the ASCII chars I tried when writing this.

> 4. There is an interaction with rainbow delimiters that there isn't an
> easy solution for. I wish there was a syntax type that was "this is a
> paren for electric pair mode but not for font locking."

This sounds like something worth being aware of, that nothing can really
(currently) be done about.

> 5. I'm not sure that the faces selected for src_ and lang are the
> right ones. Is there any issue with adding new faces specifically for
> those rather than reusing existing faces? I thought that matching the
> font locking of #+begin_src lines might make sense, but then I
> realized that that doesn't make sense because that is for blocks more
> generally.

I don't know if adding faces is a big deal or not, so I tried to pick
"sensible choices" from the current set. Further input on this would be
appreciated (particularly more people's thoughts).

--
Timothy


  reply	other threads:[~2021-05-02 21:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-31 15:00 [PATCH] Fontification for inline src blocks Timothy
2021-04-28  7:14 ` Timothy
2021-05-02 20:17   ` Timothy
2021-05-02 20:57     ` Tom Gillespie
2021-05-02 21:03       ` Timothy [this message]
2021-05-02 21:13         ` Tom Gillespie
2021-05-02 23:54           ` Tom Gillespie
2021-05-03  3:29       ` Timothy
2021-05-12 11:15         ` Timothy
2021-05-12 14:24           ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-05-12 14:47             ` Timothy
2021-05-12 15:53               ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-05-12 16:39                 ` Timothy
2021-05-13  2:38                   ` Tim Cross
2021-05-13  5:31                   ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-05-18 12:06                   ` Sébastien Miquel
2021-05-18 13:34                     ` Timothy
2021-05-18 14:36                       ` Sébastien Miquel
2021-04-29 22:59 ` TRS-80
2021-10-03  7:14 ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-10-03  7:16   ` Timothy
2021-10-03  9:09     ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-10-03  9:22       ` Timothy
2021-10-04 20:02       ` Protesilaos Stavrou
2021-11-21 14:09 ` Timothy
2021-11-22 11:52   ` Timothy
2021-11-22 12:23     ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-11-22 13:43       ` Timothy
2021-11-22 14:35         ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-11-22 14:37           ` Timothy
2021-11-23 13:30             ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-11-29 19:21               ` Timothy
2021-11-30 11:44                 ` Timothy
2021-11-30 12:45                   ` Sébastien Miquel
2021-11-30 12:46                     ` Timothy
2021-11-30 12:21                 ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-12-02 12:53     ` Eric S Fraga
2021-12-02 13:57       ` Faces for inline src blocks (was: [PATCH] Fontification for inline src blocks) Timothy
2021-12-02 15:52         ` Faces for inline src blocks Eric S Fraga
2021-12-02 15:56           ` Timothy
2021-12-02 16:15             ` Eric S Fraga
2021-11-23 10:45   ` [PATCH] Fontification " Vitaly Ankh
2021-11-23 13:45     ` Vitaly Ankh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r1iog85d.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=tecosaur@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=tgbugs@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).