From: Timothy <tecosaur@gmail.com>
To: sebastien.miquel@posteo.eu
Cc: org-mode-email <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fontification for inline src blocks
Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 21:34:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87eee49ndx.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cb93f6d8-956a-bc03-2e90-f97390e24585@posteo.eu>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 969 bytes --]
Hi Sébastien, thanks for your comments.
Sébastien Miquel <sebastien.miquel@posteo.eu> writes:
> Hi Timothy,
>
> Thanks for your work. I hope this can be merged.
:)
> Here are a few comments.
>
> Doesn't this line in ~org-toggle-inline-results-display~ throw the
> configured delimiters away when called twice ?
> : (setq org-inline-src-prettify-results (not org-inline-src-prettify-results))
>
> I think the =org-block= face should only be applied to the actual
> code, note the =src_lang= part, nor the result. For normal src blocks,
> it is only used inside the block.
In src blocks, you have the org-block-begin-line face applied. This (in
any sensible theme) has the same background as org-block. For the sake
of visual consistency, I think we want to have this applied to the
src_lang and result parts too. However, the org-block-begin-line face
overly fades the text, and so I've combined the org-block face with
other faces.
[-- Attachment #2: inline-src-back.png --]
[-- Type: image/png, Size: 9480 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 2642 bytes --]
> The ~org-src-font-lock-fontify-block~ function could be modified to
> take an optional =inline= argument. When =t=, it should not set the
> =multiline= font property. Although this is very minor, it would allow
> one to easily advice this function to behave differently in inline src
> blocks. For example, to not use the =org-block= face in this case.
I don't see where the multiline property is currently set, would you mind
pointing it out to me?
> I think the default parenthesis pair around results are bad. I much
> preferred your original brackets. Yes, as Tom said, they look alien,
> but alien is appropriate for use of ~prettify-symbols~.
I'm going to be using the original symbols in my configuration anyway
because I think they're nicer, but clearly this is contentious. I'd want
to hear from more people on this.
> Since ~prettify-symbols~ seems to be raising some usability concerns,
> perhaps ~org-inline-src-prettify-results~ should default to ~nil~.
> It'd be unlike org to hide things from the user in the default
> configuration.
This seems somewhat sensible to me, but I must say that {{{results()}}}
is /ugly/ and I suspect that many users would like the effect, but a
minority will be aware of this option. Perhaps this is worth doing
anyway.
> As Tom points out, the two faces used (for the =src_= and bracket and
> the language part) should be customizable. The default value you chose
> are fine IMO. Perhaps the language one could also be used to highlight
> the language of normal src blocks, though It might be easier to use a
> single face.
So are you suggesting I do or don't create new faces for this?
> Timothy writes:
>>> P.S. Nitpick: You do not need to run fontification in while loops. Just
>>> fontifying next match before limit should be enough. Font-lock will call
>>> the function again if needed.
>> I'm guessing for this to work I'd need to return the final char
>> fortified? Or is the moving of point enough?
>>
>> Maybe related - I've noticed this doesn't seem to work with multiple
>> src_ blocks per line, might you have any insight here?
>
> You need only return =t= if some fontification has been done (and set
> point after the fontified part). If your function returns =t=, it will
> be called again.
>
> A case can be made for keeping the loop though. It works fine and is
> clearer since the aforementioned fontlock behaviour is poorly
> documented. Really, the only downside is the loss of consistency, since
> the function ~org-fontify-meta-lines-and-blocks-1~ doesn't loop.
Returning t works nicely, and now we can highlight more than one inline
src per line :)
--
Timothy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-18 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-31 15:00 Timothy
2021-04-28 7:14 ` Timothy
2021-05-02 20:17 ` Timothy
2021-05-02 20:57 ` Tom Gillespie
2021-05-02 21:03 ` Timothy
2021-05-02 21:13 ` Tom Gillespie
2021-05-02 23:54 ` Tom Gillespie
2021-05-03 3:29 ` Timothy
2021-05-12 11:15 ` Timothy
2021-05-12 14:24 ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-05-12 14:47 ` Timothy
2021-05-12 15:53 ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-05-12 16:39 ` Timothy
2021-05-13 2:38 ` Tim Cross
2021-05-13 5:31 ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-05-18 12:06 ` Sébastien Miquel
2021-05-18 13:34 ` Timothy [this message]
2021-05-18 14:36 ` Sébastien Miquel
2021-04-29 22:59 ` TRS-80
2021-10-03 7:14 ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-10-03 7:16 ` Timothy
2021-10-03 9:09 ` Ihor Radchenko
2021-10-03 9:22 ` Timothy
2021-10-04 20:02 ` Protesilaos Stavrou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87eee49ndx.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=tecosaur@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=sebastien.miquel@posteo.eu \
--subject='Re: [PATCH] Fontification for inline src blocks' \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).