Re: [babel] using #+call for inline results

[Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com>]

Hi,

Yes, these all checked out (assuming you meant the second one /should/ 
be exported -- as quoted code -- but not evaluated).

This is a nice addition, and rather cleaner and more intuitive than 
the workarounds I've been playing with. (Faking an inline call to 
block A with an inline src block B that takes a variable from calling 
A in the header args, and shortening it with a macro that expands to B...)

Yours,
Christian

On 6/27/11 7:43 PM, Eric Schulte wrote:
>  I believe that I have fixed these
> issues.  The following examples should now all export as described.
>
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> The following exports as a normal call line
> #+call: double(it=1)
>
> Now here is an inline call call_double(it=1) stuck in the middle of
> some prose.
>
> This one should not be exported =call_double(it=2)= because it is
> quoted.
>
> Finally this next one should export, even though it starts a line
> call_double(it=3) because sometimes inline blocks fold with a
> paragraph.
>
> And, a call with raw results call_double(4)[:results raw] should not
> have quoted results.
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---