From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: [babel] using #+call for inline results
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:07:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mxhaunsi.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (raw)
Hello,
I have been playing with org babel for putting results inline within an
exported latex file. A simple example is here:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* testing inline evaluation of babel source blocks
#+srcname: benzene-chlorobenzene-relative-volatility
#+begin_src octave :exports none :results output raw :var T=25
format bank
pb = 10^(6.89272 - 1203.531/(T+219.888));
pc = 10^(7.10690 - 1500.0 /(T+224.000));
alpha = pb/pc;
disp(alpha)
#+end_src
1. The first step is to evaluate the relative volatility at \(T=25 ^{\circ} C\):
#+call: benzene-chlorobenzene-relative-volatility[:results output raw](T=25) :exports results
2. Compare this to the value we get at 50 \(^{\circ}C\):
#+call: benzene-chlorobenzene-relative-volatility(T=50) :exports results
3. Next we use this value to draw an equilibrium curve.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
If I evaluate the code block, I get what I expect:
,----
| #+results: benzene-chlorobenzene-relative-volatility
| 7.86
`----
However, when I export the file, the #+call lines get wrapped in a
verbatim environment regardless of what or where I specify for
the :results header arguments. E.g.:
,----
| \begin{enumerate}
| \item The first step is to evaluate the relative volatility at \(T=25 ^{\circ} C\):
|
|
| \begin{verbatim}
| 7.86
| \end{verbatim}
|
| \item Compare this to the value we get at 50 \(^{\circ}C\):
|
|
| \begin{verbatim}
| 6.32
| \end{verbatim}
`----
What am I doing wrong? I have tried various permutations of the
placement of the :results header and various options for it but do not
seem to have hit on the right combination.
Ideally, I would like the number to appear completely inline with the
text the precedes and follows the #+call statement. I would prefer to
not have a new paragraph started, for instance.
On a related note, although the manual seems to indicate that "raw" and
"org" are synonymous, they behave differently when evaluating a code
block with the latter encapsulating the output within #+begin_org
and #+end_org. The behaviour is fine but maybe the documentation,
assuming I have understand things correctly, should be changed to
reflect the difference in behaviour?
Thanks,
eric
--
: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.50.1
: using Org-mode version 7.5 (release_7.5.418.ge860.dirty)
next reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-22 11:07 Eric S Fraga [this message]
2011-06-22 16:23 ` [babel] using #+call for inline results Eric Schulte
2011-06-22 18:22 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-23 5:32 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-23 8:10 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-23 13:49 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2011-06-23 15:39 ` chris.m.malone
2011-06-23 17:30 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-23 19:55 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2011-06-24 8:11 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-23 9:25 ` Christian Moe
2011-06-24 22:36 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-25 19:33 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-26 11:56 ` Christian Moe
2011-06-27 0:14 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-27 6:16 ` Christian Moe
2011-06-27 17:43 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-27 19:01 ` Christian Moe
2011-06-28 8:04 ` Sebastien Vauban
2011-06-28 20:31 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-29 7:40 ` Sebastien Vauban
2011-06-29 17:12 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-29 17:25 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-27 17:09 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-27 18:45 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-29 16:38 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-29 17:59 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-22 17:53 ` Juan Pechiar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mxhaunsi.fsf@ucl.ac.uk \
--to=e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).