From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
To: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [babel] using #+call for inline results
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:30:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r56k78wm.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sjr0psih.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Thu, 23 Jun 2011 15:49:26 +0200")
Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:
> Hello,
>
> Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> writes:
>
>> For completeness, I've attached a file which shows that it *can* work
>> but also that it confuses the export of lists (Nicolas?) if the inline
>> code is in a list item.
>
> I see no difference between the paragraph and the list item: in both
> cases, the table doesn't appear, as it has been moved right after the
> headline by `org-export-blocks-preprocess' during export.
>
> Are we observing the same phenomenon?
>
> Regards,
No, I don't believe so. Nothing to do with the table; all to do with
the two inline babel evaluations. The latex I get exported by this
snippet of org code:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
The relative volatility is src_octave[:var it=benzene-chlorobenzene-relative-volatility :results output raw]{disp(it);}.
If I put the result in a list:
- it does not work as the result is src_octave[:var it=benzene-chlorobenzene-relative-volatility :results output raw]{disp(it);} and the list processing is confused.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
is
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
The relative volatility is 7.8578
.
If I put the result in a list:
\begin{itemize}
\item it does not work as the result is 7.8578
\end{itemize}
and the list processing is confused.
ORG-LIST-END-MARKER
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
The in-paragraph processing is "fine" (modulo a spurious newline).
However, the list item is terminated prematurely immediately after the
result of the babel code evaluation *and* there is an
=ORG-LIST-END-MARKER= left over! I guess the problem is due to babel
moving things around during the list processing?
From the recent messages, it sounds like there is a sort of race
condition being caused by some list processing followed by babel
processing and then again by list processing during the export process?
Or have I misunderstood the problems?
In any case, nothing major! Just a consequence of living at the
bleeding edge ;-) Thanks for looking into these problems.
--
: Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D) in Emacs 24.0.50.1
: using Org-mode version 7.5 (release_7.5.423.g101a3)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-23 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-22 11:07 [babel] using #+call for inline results Eric S Fraga
2011-06-22 16:23 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-22 18:22 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-23 5:32 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-23 8:10 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-23 13:49 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2011-06-23 15:39 ` chris.m.malone
2011-06-23 17:30 ` Eric S Fraga [this message]
2011-06-23 19:55 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2011-06-24 8:11 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-23 9:25 ` Christian Moe
2011-06-24 22:36 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-25 19:33 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-26 11:56 ` Christian Moe
2011-06-27 0:14 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-27 6:16 ` Christian Moe
2011-06-27 17:43 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-27 19:01 ` Christian Moe
2011-06-28 8:04 ` Sebastien Vauban
2011-06-28 20:31 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-29 7:40 ` Sebastien Vauban
2011-06-29 17:12 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-29 17:25 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-27 17:09 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-27 18:45 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-29 16:38 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-29 17:59 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-22 17:53 ` Juan Pechiar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r56k78wm.fsf@ucl.ac.uk \
--to=e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=schulte.eric@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).