From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [babel] using #+call for inline results
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:23:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mxh9omwb.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mxhaunsi.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> (Eric S. Fraga's message of "Wed, 22 Jun 2011 12:07:57 +0100")
Hi Eric,
So the problem is that the results are inserted as a separate block,
when you want them to be inserted inline? If so perhaps using an
"inline" block http://orgmode.org/manual/Structure-of-code-blocks.html
would result in the desired behavior.
Please let me know if I've misunderstood the question.
Best -- Eric
Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I have been playing with org babel for putting results inline within an
> exported latex file. A simple example is here:
>
> * testing inline evaluation of babel source blocks
>
> #+srcname: benzene-chlorobenzene-relative-volatility
> #+begin_src octave :exports none :results output raw :var T=25
> format bank
> pb = 10^(6.89272 - 1203.531/(T+219.888));
> pc = 10^(7.10690 - 1500.0 /(T+224.000));
> alpha = pb/pc;
> disp(alpha)
> #+end_src
>
> 1. The first step is to evaluate the relative volatility at \(T=25 ^{\circ} C\):
> #+call: benzene-chlorobenzene-relative-volatility[:results output raw](T=25) :exports results
>
> 2. Compare this to the value we get at 50 \(^{\circ}C\):
> #+call: benzene-chlorobenzene-relative-volatility(T=50) :exports results
>
> 3. Next we use this value to draw an equilibrium curve.
>
>
> If I evaluate the code block, I get what I expect:
>
> ,----
> | #+results: benzene-chlorobenzene-relative-volatility
> | 7.86
> `----
>
> However, when I export the file, the #+call lines get wrapped in a
> verbatim environment regardless of what or where I specify for
> the :results header arguments. E.g.:
>
> ,----
> | \begin{enumerate}
> | \item The first step is to evaluate the relative volatility at \(T=25 ^{\circ} C\):
> |
> |
> | \begin{verbatim}
> | 7.86
> | \end{verbatim}
> |
> | \item Compare this to the value we get at 50 \(^{\circ}C\):
> |
> |
> | \begin{verbatim}
> | 6.32
> | \end{verbatim}
> `----
>
> What am I doing wrong? I have tried various permutations of the
> placement of the :results header and various options for it but do not
> seem to have hit on the right combination.
>
> Ideally, I would like the number to appear completely inline with the
> text the precedes and follows the #+call statement. I would prefer to
> not have a new paragraph started, for instance.
>
> On a related note, although the manual seems to indicate that "raw" and
> "org" are synonymous, they behave differently when evaluating a code
> block with the latter encapsulating the output within #+begin_org
> and #+end_org. The behaviour is fine but maybe the documentation,
> assuming I have understand things correctly, should be changed to
> reflect the difference in behaviour?
>
> Thanks,
> eric
--
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-06-22 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-22 11:07 [babel] using #+call for inline results Eric S Fraga
2011-06-22 16:23 ` Eric Schulte [this message]
2011-06-22 18:22 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-23 5:32 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-23 8:10 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-23 13:49 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2011-06-23 15:39 ` chris.m.malone
2011-06-23 17:30 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-23 19:55 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2011-06-24 8:11 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-23 9:25 ` Christian Moe
2011-06-24 22:36 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-25 19:33 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-26 11:56 ` Christian Moe
2011-06-27 0:14 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-27 6:16 ` Christian Moe
2011-06-27 17:43 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-27 19:01 ` Christian Moe
2011-06-28 8:04 ` Sebastien Vauban
2011-06-28 20:31 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-29 7:40 ` Sebastien Vauban
2011-06-29 17:12 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-29 17:25 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-27 17:09 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-27 18:45 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-29 16:38 ` Eric S Fraga
2011-06-29 17:59 ` Eric Schulte
2011-06-22 17:53 ` Juan Pechiar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mxh9omwb.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=schulte.eric@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).