emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Avdi Grimm" <avdi@avdi.org>
To: Sebastian Rose <sebastian_rose@gmx.de>
Cc: emacs-orgmode Org-Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: How you can help
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:10:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ecbcf0fb0810231210n679c1a15t8d1f70aeeff1bbee@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877i7z9px8.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ>

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:33 PM, Sebastian Rose <sebastian_rose@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hm - how about:
>
> 1. A not yet existent elisp file test-worg.el, that defines a function
> hello-worg, and a variable lang, and simply puts "Hello Worg"into the
> minibuffer (if (string= lang "en")) and "Hallo Worg" (if (string= lang
> "de")) ?

I'd prefer something that would be of concrete value to someone in
using org-mode - made-up scenarios tend to lead to unrealistic tests.

> Did you work with unit-testing frameworks for elisp already?
> Which one?

I have not.  I've done test-driven development in Java, C#, Ruby, and
C++(!) though, and if I can do it in C++ I think I can get up to speed
in any language pretty quickly ;-)

> Recommendations?

As I said in another comment, I'm liking the look of Emacs Lisp
Expectations a *lot*.  Partly because I think Jay Fields is bang on
the money for how maintain good habits in your tests, and partly
because it has a mocking framework to go with it.  Testing without a
mocking framework is less fun than testing with.  However, I haven't
actually used it yet, so I can't responsibly recommend it.  Let's just
say that the discovery of it recently was the thing that got me
excited about doing some serious ELisp development.

> Could say something about the effort to get started with such a
> framework?

I think if you have some *running* examples to crib from it shouldn't
take someone who is already ELisp-savvy more than a few hours to get
the hang of it.

>
> Can we add it without changing Org's code? If understand 2. correctly - yes?

In a dynamic language like ELisp, any testing framework that requires
you to change the code just to get it under test isn't worth using.
No, you should not have to change org-mode's code to get started with
tests.

That said, developing in concert with a test suite will definitely
tend to influence how you write the code.  Generally speaking,
developing with tests encourages smaller functions which do one thing
and one thing alone and don't have a lot of non-obvious inputs and
outputs.  Since this is usually the direction you *want* your code to
go in anyway, it's a virtuous cycle.

-- 
Avdi

Home: http://avdi.org
Developer Blog: http://avdi.org/devblog/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/avdi
Journal: http://avdi.livejournal.com

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-23 19:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-23 12:04 How you can help Ben Alexander
2008-10-23 13:43 ` Bernt Hansen
2008-10-23 15:04   ` Sebastian Rose
2008-10-23 15:49     ` Richard Riley
2008-10-23 16:22       ` Ben Alexander
2008-10-23 17:02       ` Sebastian Rose
2008-10-24 12:13         ` Richard Riley
2008-10-24 15:39           ` Sebastian Rose
2008-10-24 16:27           ` Manish
2008-10-24 18:41             ` Avdi Grimm
2008-10-23 19:13       ` Avdi Grimm
2008-10-24 12:19         ` Richard Riley
2008-10-23 16:19     ` Bernt Hansen
2008-10-24  5:05       ` Carsten Dominik
2008-10-23 17:01   ` Jason F. McBrayer
2008-10-23 23:46     ` Eric Schulte
2008-10-23 14:20 ` Sebastian Rose
2008-10-23 14:50   ` Manish
2008-10-23 15:46     ` Eric Schulte
2008-10-23 16:18       ` Avdi Grimm
2008-10-23 14:55   ` Ben Alexander
2008-10-23 16:26     ` Sebastian Rose
2008-10-23 16:42       ` Avdi Grimm
2008-10-23 17:33         ` Sebastian Rose
2008-10-23 19:10           ` Avdi Grimm [this message]
2008-10-24 21:09           ` Tom Breton (Tehom)
2008-10-24 18:33         ` Ben Alexander
2008-10-24 18:44           ` Avdi Grimm
2008-10-24 19:02             ` Jeff Mickey
2008-10-26 19:49             ` org-cycle broken when cursor is at ellipses Ben Alexander
2008-10-26 21:31               ` Cameron Horsburgh
2008-10-27  8:47                 ` Carsten Dominik
2008-10-27  8:47               ` Carsten Dominik
     [not found]       ` <D43ED86C-EFD4-4BA8-8528-4F82DB11D625@alexanderonline.org>
2008-10-23 17:12         ` How you can help Sebastian Rose
2008-10-23 15:08 ` Sebastian Rose
     [not found] <E1Kt27M-0008Tx-0J@box188.bluehost.com>
2008-10-23 16:11 ` Robert Goldman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-10-23  7:35 Carsten Dominik
2008-10-23  8:12 ` Manish
2008-10-23  9:24 ` Sebastian Rose
2008-10-23 10:28   ` Sebastian Rose
2008-10-23 15:23 ` Russell Adams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ecbcf0fb0810231210n679c1a15t8d1f70aeeff1bbee@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=avdi@avdi.org \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=sebastian_rose@gmx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).