From: David Masterson <dsmasterson@gmail.com>
To: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Multiple versions of Org in load-path problem
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2022 23:16:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SJ0PR03MB54559D5E6849C26AAF6CA044A21D9@SJ0PR03MB5455.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SJ0PR03MB5455E1FA2C2887B0200CA8B6A21D9@SJ0PR03MB5455.namprd03.prod.outlook.com> (David Masterson's message of "Wed, 07 Dec 2022 19:27:07 -0800")
David Masterson <dsmasterson@gmail.com> writes:
> Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
>
>> David Masterson <dsmasterson@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Is there a proper way to do this? Do I really have to delete the
>>> built-in 9.3 version (by hand or package-delete?) or will that mess up
>>> something else? I saw mention of 'unload-feature' which is new to me --
>>> would that be safe to use?
>>
>> In theory, Emacs should handle such updates even when built-in Org is
>> loaded. See https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=59882
>
> I'm going to test if (in my case) the buit-in 9.3 is already loaded when
> my .emacs runs, I also have to see when 9.6 loads in my .emacs.
>
>> unload-feature is the last resort. We are still discussing the available
>> options in https://orgmode.org/list/87k033h218.fsf@localhost.
>
> I have to play with the solution I suggested. I'm beginning to wonder
> if it will cause other problems with (seeming) Org dependent packages.
> In my case, the error I get is from various use-package calls --
> something like "Error: org-assert-version is not known". This is
> confusing because I've arranged my .emacs as (almost) an alphabetical
> loading of the packages and some of the use-package errors are coming
> from packages loaded before Org. IOW, org-assert-version from 9.6
> shouldn't be loaded yet and 9.3 doesn't have org-assert-version. So
> what's referring to org-assert-version?
I went so far as to add the following to early-init.el:
(if (featurep 'org) (load-feature 'org))
(add-to-list 'load-path (expand-file-name "~/.emacs.d/elpa/org-9.6")
(load-library "org")
The load-library still fails with the org-assert-version error.
Could it be that, when you package-install Org-9.6, it runs through a
check where (I think) it compiles the package? I get a lot of warnings
and 34(?) failed files. Could it be that some of the files are not
built and, so, when I load-library, I'm picking up some of the wrong
files from the built-in Org-9.3? Do we need to remove all versions of
Org that is not the current version from the load-path at the very
beginning of org.el to ensure no fall-through? Kind of a hack, but...
--
David Masterson
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-08 7:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-06 2:50 Multiple versions of Org in load-path problem David Masterson
2022-12-06 5:36 ` tomas
2022-12-06 7:04 ` David Masterson
2022-12-07 13:30 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-12-08 3:27 ` David Masterson
2022-12-08 7:16 ` David Masterson [this message]
2022-12-08 7:26 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-12-08 18:24 ` David Masterson
2022-12-08 19:31 ` Michel Schinz
2022-12-08 21:56 ` David Masterson
2022-12-08 22:56 ` Tim Cross
2022-12-09 5:00 ` David Masterson
2022-12-09 6:56 ` Tim Cross
2022-12-09 15:49 ` Sharon Kimble
2022-12-10 20:38 ` Tom Gillespie
2022-12-09 7:17 ` bug#59882: " Eli Zaretskii
2022-12-09 7:43 ` David Masterson
2022-12-09 11:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-12-09 19:40 ` Cook, Malcolm
2022-12-09 19:51 ` David Masterson
2022-12-09 20:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-12-10 14:01 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-12-14 9:51 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-12-14 12:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-12-14 13:37 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-12-14 14:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-12-14 16:02 ` Max Nikulin
2022-12-15 4:17 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-12-15 4:56 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-12-16 12:36 ` Max Nikulin
2022-12-16 14:47 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-12-18 15:24 ` Max Nikulin
2022-12-18 15:40 ` Stefan Monnier
2023-04-06 16:09 ` Max Nikulin
2023-04-06 21:25 ` Stefan Monnier
2023-04-19 4:20 ` Tom Gillespie
2022-12-25 9:48 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-12-25 11:46 ` Max Nikulin
2022-12-26 8:44 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-12-26 11:01 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-12-26 12:25 ` Max Nikulin
2022-12-27 9:47 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-12-27 9:56 ` Max Nikulin
2023-02-03 11:02 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-03 12:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-03 20:01 ` Tim Cross
2023-02-14 22:53 ` Gregor Zattler
2023-02-16 12:14 ` Max Nikulin
2023-02-21 5:22 ` Richard Stallman
2023-02-21 12:32 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-21 17:26 ` Bhavin Gandhi
2023-02-22 10:48 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-02-22 16:58 ` Bhavin Gandhi
2023-02-23 9:35 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-04-06 15:02 ` Max Nikulin
2022-12-14 14:25 ` Stefan Monnier
2022-12-14 21:49 ` Cook, Malcolm
2022-12-09 19:47 ` Cook, Malcolm
2022-12-08 21:50 ` Cook, Malcolm
[not found] ` <87o7se74bf.fsf@penguin>
2022-12-08 7:19 ` David Masterson
2022-12-08 9:10 ` Ihor Radchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SJ0PR03MB54559D5E6849C26AAF6CA044A21D9@SJ0PR03MB5455.namprd03.prod.outlook.com \
--to=dsmasterson@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=yantar92@posteo.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).