From: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org>, Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [ANN] List improvement v.2
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 13:36:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AANLkTikY9ieF9AEHFS5sPVzKr-ns=_WnJgrAypbASRcS@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y6bhajrm.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com>
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>>>>>> Matt Lundin writes:
>
>> 1. On my machine, toggling a checkbox within a long list takes a
>> long time. I have a 200+ item list. It takes approximately 5 seconds
>> for org to toggle a single checkbox within the list (see elp results
>> below).[1] With the previous list implementation, toggling happened
>> immediately. (Note: I am not using headline cookies in conjunction
>> with that particular list.)
>
>> 2. Typing C-c C-x C-b on the following headline correctly checks all
>> boxes; typing C-c C-x C-b again, however, does not uncheck the
>> boxes.
>
> I just sent to maintainers a patch that should fix both issues. Please
> tell me if it works for you when it hits master branch.
>
> By the way, as you are using quite long lists, you might want to know
> that C-c C-x C-b will be faster than C-c C-c to toggle a single item,
> as C-c C-c also checks numbering, indentation, and the overall
> integrity of the list.
One possibility to improve performance would then be to have C-c C-c
not do that, but to only do that when changing a bullet type or so.
I think that C-c C-c to toggle a bullet is a good key and should be
fast, also for long lists.
- Carsten
>
> Thank you for reporting this.
>
> Regards,
>
> -- Nicolas
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-09-04 11:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-07-22 21:08 [ANN] List improvement v.2 Nicolas Goaziou
2010-07-23 7:55 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-07-23 16:58 ` Eric Schulte
2010-07-25 16:17 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-07-27 12:51 ` Scot Becker
2010-07-27 14:50 ` Daniel Martins
2010-07-27 17:49 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-08-15 6:26 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-08-15 8:45 ` Glauber Alex Dias Prado
2010-08-15 11:29 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-08-15 14:40 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-08-15 20:52 ` Glauber Alex Dias Prado
2010-08-16 7:17 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-08-15 13:21 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-08-15 14:07 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-08-17 17:24 ` Request for opinions: [ANN] List improvement v.2o Carsten Dominik
2010-08-17 17:25 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-08-17 18:02 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-08-18 6:53 ` Sébastien Vauban
2010-08-18 22:50 ` Daniel Martins
2010-08-18 7:38 ` Christian Moe
2010-08-18 9:09 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-08-18 12:39 ` Christian Moe
2010-08-20 0:56 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-08-21 11:29 ` Bernt Hansen
2010-08-21 14:18 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-08-21 14:22 ` Bernt Hansen
2010-08-27 8:24 ` [ANN] List improvement v.2 Carsten Dominik
2010-08-27 10:57 ` Bernt Hansen
2010-09-02 8:13 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-09-03 8:39 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-09-03 14:34 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-09-03 17:16 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-09-03 20:26 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-09-03 20:42 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-09-03 15:06 ` Sebastian Rose
2010-09-04 3:54 ` Matt Lundin
2010-09-04 10:24 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-09-04 11:36 ` Carsten Dominik [this message]
2010-09-04 12:09 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-09-07 11:25 ` Strange behavior of M-RET with new list improvements Anthony Lander
2010-09-07 11:46 ` Bernt Hansen
2010-09-07 12:05 ` Anthony Lander
2010-09-07 17:11 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-09-17 13:01 ` [Bug] Level 2 text not exported in LaTeX (well in HTML) + some comments Sébastien Vauban
2010-09-17 15:29 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-09-18 18:02 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-09-18 21:53 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-09-19 9:24 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-09-19 21:07 ` Sébastien Vauban
2010-09-20 7:54 ` Eric S Fraga
2010-09-22 11:35 ` Carsten Dominik
2010-09-22 20:21 ` Sébastien Vauban
2010-09-22 21:31 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-09-18 17:44 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2010-09-19 21:01 ` Sébastien Vauban
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='AANLkTikY9ieF9AEHFS5sPVzKr-ns=_WnJgrAypbASRcS@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=carsten.dominik@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
--cc=mdl@imapmail.org \
--cc=n.goaziou@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).