From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: [ANN] List improvement v.2 Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 13:36:01 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87ocdzw7gq.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> <43BA920D-4EA2-4C51-B941-33A60D097EB3@gmail.com> <87hbi6uprt.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87y6bhajrm.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51151 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Orr2R-0003ak-Te for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 07:36:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Orr2Q-00012l-TB for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 07:36:03 -0400 Received: from mail-iw0-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:51244) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Orr2Q-00012L-QN for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 07:36:02 -0400 Received: by iwn33 with SMTP id 33so3417644iwn.0 for ; Sat, 04 Sep 2010 04:36:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87y6bhajrm.wl%n.goaziou@gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: Matt Lundin , Org Mode List On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, >>>>>> Matt Lundin writes: > >> 1. On my machine, toggling a checkbox within a long list takes a >> long time. I have a 200+ item list. It takes approximately 5 seconds >> for org to toggle a single checkbox within the list (see elp results >> below).[1] With the previous list implementation, toggling happened >> immediately. (Note: I am not using headline cookies in conjunction >> with that particular list.) > >> 2. Typing C-c C-x C-b on the following headline correctly checks all >> boxes; typing C-c C-x C-b again, however, does not uncheck the >> boxes. > > I just sent to maintainers a patch that should fix both issues. Please > tell me if it works for you when it hits master branch. > > By the way, as you are using quite long lists, you might want to know > that C-c C-x C-b will be faster than C-c C-c to toggle a single item, > as C-c C-c also checks numbering, indentation, and the overall > integrity of the list. One possibility to improve performance would then be to have C-c C-c not do that, but to only do that when changing a bullet type or so. I think that C-c C-c to toggle a bullet is a good key and should be fast, also for long lists. - Carsten > > Thank you for reporting this. > > Regards, > > -- Nicolas >