* Export: definition lists; ordered lists
@ 2013-03-04 3:35 Alan L Tyree
2013-03-04 8:15 ` Nicolas Goaziou
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alan L Tyree @ 2013-03-04 3:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Org-mode
G'day Orgers,
Problem 1: definition lists when exported to HTML, ODT or ASCII look
just like they do in the ort-mode file. Shouldn't they be "fixed up"
somehow?
Problem 2: I need to export footnotes that are not Org footnotes. They
look like this:
1. This is footnote one
2. This is footnote two
Of course, the exporter thinks that I am dealing with ordered
lists. According to the manual (*if* I understand it correctly), I
should be able to get what I want with:
[@1]. This is footnote 1.
[@2]. This is footnote 2.
But I don't. The exported text looks exactly like the two lines above.
Am I doing something wrong?
(I cheated on the problem by leaving off the full stop in the originals,
but I would like it there).
Cheers, and thanks for any comments,
Alan
--
Alan L Tyree http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel: 04 2748 6206 sip:172385@iptel.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Export: definition lists; ordered lists
2013-03-04 3:35 Export: definition lists; ordered lists Alan L Tyree
@ 2013-03-04 8:15 ` Nicolas Goaziou
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nicolas Goaziou @ 2013-03-04 8:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan L Tyree; +Cc: Org-mode
Hello,
Alan L Tyree <alantyree@gmail.com> writes:
> Problem 1: definition lists when exported to HTML, ODT or ASCII look
> just like they do in the ort-mode file. Shouldn't they be "fixed up"
> somehow?
Could you give examples of the "fixed up" output you expect in these
cases?
> Problem 2: I need to export footnotes that are not Org footnotes. They
> look like this:
>
> 1. This is footnote one
>
> 2. This is footnote two
What are "footnotes" that are not "Org footnotes"? Do you mean "I need
to use lists instead of footnotes"?
> Of course, the exporter thinks that I am dealing with ordered
> lists. According to the manual (*if* I understand it correctly), I
> should be able to get what I want with:
>
> [@1]. This is footnote 1.
>
> [@2]. This is footnote 2.
>
> But I don't. The exported text looks exactly like the two lines above.
>
> Am I doing something wrong?
I'm not sure to understand, but, IIUC, you want a list with counters.
The correct syntax should then be:
3. [@3] This is footnote 3
You don't have to specify a counter on each item, as numbers of items
below will be incremented automatically.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-03-04 8:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-03-04 3:35 Export: definition lists; ordered lists Alan L Tyree
2013-03-04 8:15 ` Nicolas Goaziou
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).