From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alan L Tyree <alantyree@gmail.com>
Subject: Export: definition lists; ordered lists
Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:35:07 +1100
Message-ID: <87fw0b6dn8.fsf@breezy.my.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60397)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alantyree@gmail.com>) id 1UCMB7-00074O-8q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:35:09 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alantyree@gmail.com>) id 1UCMB3-0007Uk-01
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:35:05 -0500
Received: from mail-da0-f52.google.com ([209.85.210.52]:42356)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alantyree@gmail.com>) id 1UCMB2-0007Sn-QC
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 22:35:00 -0500
Received: by mail-da0-f52.google.com with SMTP id x33so2314283dad.25
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 19:34:59 -0800 (PST)
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

G'day Orgers,

Problem 1: definition lists when exported to HTML, ODT or ASCII look
just like they do in the ort-mode file. Shouldn't they be "fixed up"
somehow?

Problem 2: I need to export footnotes that are not Org footnotes. They
look like this:

1. This is footnote one

2. This is footnote two

Of course, the exporter thinks that I am dealing with ordered
lists. According to the manual (*if* I understand it correctly), I
should be able to get what I want with:

[@1]. This is footnote 1.

[@2]. This is footnote 2.

But I don't. The exported text looks exactly like the two lines above.

Am I doing something wrong?

(I cheated on the problem by leaving off the full stop in the originals,
but I would like it there).

Cheers, and thanks for any comments,
Alan

-- 
Alan L Tyree           http://www2.austlii.edu.au/~alan
Tel:  04 2748 6206     sip:172385@iptel.org