From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Export: definition lists; ordered lists Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 09:15:28 +0100 Message-ID: <871ubvvavz.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87fw0b6dn8.fsf@breezy.my.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52919) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCQYg-0003wA-2O for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 03:15:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCQYf-0000pt-2J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 03:15:42 -0500 Received: from mail-wi0-f182.google.com ([209.85.212.182]:40071) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCQYe-0000pg-RZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 03:15:40 -0500 Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hi18so1662715wib.9 for ; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 00:15:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87fw0b6dn8.fsf@breezy.my.home> (Alan L. Tyree's message of "Mon, 04 Mar 2013 14:35:07 +1100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Alan L Tyree Cc: Org-mode Hello, Alan L Tyree writes: > Problem 1: definition lists when exported to HTML, ODT or ASCII look > just like they do in the ort-mode file. Shouldn't they be "fixed up" > somehow? Could you give examples of the "fixed up" output you expect in these cases? > Problem 2: I need to export footnotes that are not Org footnotes. They > look like this: > > 1. This is footnote one > > 2. This is footnote two What are "footnotes" that are not "Org footnotes"? Do you mean "I need to use lists instead of footnotes"? > Of course, the exporter thinks that I am dealing with ordered > lists. According to the manual (*if* I understand it correctly), I > should be able to get what I want with: > > [@1]. This is footnote 1. > > [@2]. This is footnote 2. > > But I don't. The exported text looks exactly like the two lines above. > > Am I doing something wrong? I'm not sure to understand, but, IIUC, you want a list with counters. The correct syntax should then be: 3. [@3] This is footnote 3 You don't have to specify a counter on each item, as numbers of items below will be incremented automatically. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou