From: Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSSION] May we recognize everything like [[protocol:uri]] as a non-fuzzy link? (was: [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)])
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 21:58:32 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ud4ras$71a$1@ciao.gmane.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871qfhhw7h.fsf@localhost>
On 02/09/2023 14:26, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> With my proposal, it would become
>
> (link :type "sec" :path "spielbeispiel" ...)
>
> However, "sec" link type will still not be listed in the output
> `org-link-types' (not registered).
>
> Then, ox.el and other link processing code, when encountering a link
> type that is not registered, will fall back to searching "fuzzy" link.
>
> So, export, and following the link should not be affected.
I do not see which way it may help in the reported case of complications
with URI schemes not enabled by default. What is the purpose of parser
changes if links can not be exported or opened?
I am unsure if any "PREFIX:" should be recognized as a link type, but
there is another possibility on this way: allow users to mark some
prefixes as search links, not link types.
Taking into account requests to enable more URI schemes by default,
requiring to explicitly disable some prefixes may be acceptable
compromise. It may be necessary even if fixed set of link types is
allowed by default instead of arbitrary prefix.
Changes of behavior disturbs a part of users, but strictly adhering
backward compatibility means inconvenience for others.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-04 15:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-31 15:25 [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)] Csepp
2023-09-01 2:44 ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-01 9:04 ` [DISCUSSION] May we recognize everything like [[protocol:uri]] as a non-fuzzy link? (was: [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)]) Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-01 10:49 ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2023-09-01 11:01 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-01 12:25 ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2023-09-02 7:26 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-02 7:54 ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2023-09-04 14:58 ` Max Nikulin [this message]
2023-09-05 11:02 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-06 14:27 ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-07 10:42 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-07 11:07 ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-07 11:22 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-01 12:15 ` [DISCUSSION] May we recognize everything like [[protocol:uri]] as a non-fuzzy link? Jens Lechtenboerger
2023-09-02 7:29 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-01 18:53 ` [DISCUSSION] May we recognize everything like [[protocol:uri]] as a non-fuzzy link? (was: [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)]) Tom Gillespie
2023-09-02 7:45 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-02 12:00 ` [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)] Max Nikulin
2023-09-03 7:53 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-04 10:51 ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-05 9:42 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-10 4:40 ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-17 22:08 ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2023-09-18 15:20 ` Exporting elisp: and shell: links Max Nikulin
2023-09-19 0:10 ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2023-09-19 15:19 ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-21 9:49 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-22 23:43 ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2023-09-25 14:38 ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-26 10:42 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-28 15:31 ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2023-10-08 9:48 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-10-09 12:04 ` Max Nikulin
2023-10-09 12:12 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-10-10 10:35 ` Max Nikulin
2023-10-12 11:35 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-10-13 10:20 ` Max Nikulin
2023-10-14 8:13 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-10-11 19:34 ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2024-02-05 15:41 ` [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)] Ihor Radchenko
2024-03-12 11:00 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-04 15:08 ` [DISCUSSION] May we recognize everything like [[protocol:uri]] as a non-fuzzy link? (was: [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)]) Max Nikulin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='ud4ras$71a$1@ciao.gmane.io' \
--to=manikulin@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).