emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net>
To: Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>, Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>,
	Timothy <orgmode@tec.tecosaur.net>,
	Tom Gillespie <tgbugs@gmail.com>
Cc: Csepp <raingloom@riseup.net>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: [DISCUSSION] May we recognize everything like [[protocol:uri]] as a non-fuzzy link? (was: [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)])
Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2023 09:04:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a5u6tgb3.fsf@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89434f4f-8aea-23f2-bbfc-3961c18f2154@gmail.com>

Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> writes:

> However I do not mind to have an easy way to delegate URI from :export 
> function to the link transcoder of active export backend.

Just make the :export function return nil.

> Current behavior with with treating link paths as fuzzy search targets 
> is a kind of compromise. It allows internal search links to be shorter. 
> One may have e.g. #+name: fig:something code blocks, so not every link 
> looking as having some "scheme:" prefix should be treated as an external 
> URI. As a result link types must be enabled explicitly.

This is exactly the reason why Org recognizes a closed list of link
types and not just "anything looking like protocol:uri".

And I am honestly not a big fan - because of the limitations of Elisp
regexps, there is actually a hard limit on the number of link types we
can support - no more than few hundreds, AFAIR. This is because Elisp
regexps cannot be larger than certain length.

On the other hand, Org also supports "plain" links without brackets and
for such links it does make sense to avoid parsing something like A:B as
a link.

In theory, we might change the parser to treat anything like foo:bar or
<foo:bar> or [[foo:bar]] as a link with "foo" protocol and "bar" URI.
And introduce [[::fig:something]] to allow explicit internal links.
But, despite simplifying the parser, it will certainly be a breaking
change.

Any thoughts?

-- 
Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
Org mode contributor,
Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>


  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-01  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-31 15:25 [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)] Csepp
2023-09-01  2:44 ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-01  9:04   ` Ihor Radchenko [this message]
2023-09-01 10:49     ` [DISCUSSION] May we recognize everything like [[protocol:uri]] as a non-fuzzy link? (was: [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)]) Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2023-09-01 11:01       ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-01 12:25         ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2023-09-02  7:26           ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-02  7:54             ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2023-09-04 14:58             ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-05 11:02               ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-06 14:27                 ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-07 10:42                   ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-07 11:07                     ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-07 11:22                       ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-01 12:15     ` [DISCUSSION] May we recognize everything like [[protocol:uri]] as a non-fuzzy link? Jens Lechtenboerger
2023-09-02  7:29       ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-01 18:53     ` [DISCUSSION] May we recognize everything like [[protocol:uri]] as a non-fuzzy link? (was: [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)]) Tom Gillespie
2023-09-02  7:45       ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-02 12:00     ` [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)] Max Nikulin
2023-09-03  7:53       ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-04 10:51         ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-05  9:42           ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-10  4:40             ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-17 22:08               ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2023-09-18 15:20                 ` Exporting elisp: and shell: links Max Nikulin
2023-09-19  0:10                   ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2023-09-19 15:19                     ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-21  9:49                       ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-22 23:43                         ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2023-09-25 14:38                           ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-26 10:42                             ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-28 15:31                               ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2023-10-08  9:48                                 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-10-09 12:04                                   ` Max Nikulin
2023-10-09 12:12                                     ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-10-10 10:35                                       ` Max Nikulin
2023-10-12 11:35                                         ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-10-13 10:20                                           ` Max Nikulin
2023-10-14  8:13                                             ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-10-11 19:34                                   ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2024-02-05 15:41               ` [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)] Ihor Radchenko
2024-03-12 11:00                 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-04 15:08     ` [DISCUSSION] May we recognize everything like [[protocol:uri]] as a non-fuzzy link? (was: [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)]) Max Nikulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a5u6tgb3.fsf@localhost \
    --to=yantar92@posteo.net \
    --cc=bzg@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=manikulin@gmail.com \
    --cc=orgmode@tec.tecosaur.net \
    --cc=raingloom@riseup.net \
    --cc=tgbugs@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).