emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)]
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2023 17:51:48 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ud4cs7$f66$1@ciao.gmane.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878r9nofpw.fsf@localhost>

On 03/09/2023 14:53, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
> Max Nikulin writes:
>> I missed this feature, but anyway it does not work as expected.
>>
>>     (org-link-set-parameters "tel")
...
>>     \href{321}{call}
>>
>> "tel:" is missed.

I have realized that it is possible to take advantage of current behavior:

   (org-link-set-parameters
    "browse"
    :follow
    (lambda (url arg) (browse-url url arg)))

so [[browse:tel:+321][call]] with *any* protocol is properly exported 
and opened. The only inconvenience is that the "browse:" type must be 
added when a link is inserted or stripped down to copy a URL.

> (path (org-latex--protect-text
> 		(pcase type
> 		  ((or "http" "https" "ftp" "mailto" "doi")
> 		   (concat type ":" raw-path))
> 		  ("file"
> 		   (org-export-file-uri raw-path))
> 		  (_
> 		   raw-path))))
> 
> is fishy.

I do not like that lists of types in ox backends are not the same as in 
ol.el:

(dolist (scheme '("ftp" "http" "https" "mailto" "news"))
   (org-link-set-parameters scheme

> We may simply use (org-element-property :raw-link link) and leave
> special handling to "file" links only.
> 
> Does it make sense?

 From my point of view it will be more sane behavior. However it may 
require update of 3rd party ox backends.

>> Actually I had in mind more flexible delegation. :export functions
>> should be able to alter URI, attributes and to provide description if it
>> is missed, but did not care if '<a href=""></a>' or '\href{}{}' should
>> be used.
> 
> I'd call that :filter rather than :export :)

It is an option, the only disadvantage is that `org-link-properties' can 
not set an export filter directly.

> Have nothing against it, though it is not 100% relevant to this
> particular report.

If there were an `org-link-properties' field to export link as a parsed 
element, not just path and description then it would be easier to define 
backend agnostic export function for a non-standard link type.

>> Easy way to add protocol/scheme should include :follow with `browse-url'
>> as well.
> 
> Sorry, but I do not understand what you are referring to.
> May you elaborate?

My reading of the bug report subject is that it should be easy to define 
a link type for a protocol not supported by Org mode out of the box. 
Minimal features are export and follow using a handler configured 
desktop-wide or Emacs-wide.




  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-04 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-31 15:25 [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)] Csepp
2023-09-01  2:44 ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-01  9:04   ` [DISCUSSION] May we recognize everything like [[protocol:uri]] as a non-fuzzy link? (was: [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)]) Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-01 10:49     ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2023-09-01 11:01       ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-01 12:25         ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2023-09-02  7:26           ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-02  7:54             ` Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
2023-09-04 14:58             ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-05 11:02               ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-06 14:27                 ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-07 10:42                   ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-07 11:07                     ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-07 11:22                       ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-01 12:15     ` [DISCUSSION] May we recognize everything like [[protocol:uri]] as a non-fuzzy link? Jens Lechtenboerger
2023-09-02  7:29       ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-01 18:53     ` [DISCUSSION] May we recognize everything like [[protocol:uri]] as a non-fuzzy link? (was: [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)]) Tom Gillespie
2023-09-02  7:45       ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-02 12:00     ` [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)] Max Nikulin
2023-09-03  7:53       ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-04 10:51         ` Max Nikulin [this message]
2023-09-05  9:42           ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-10  4:40             ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-17 22:08               ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2023-09-18 15:20                 ` Exporting elisp: and shell: links Max Nikulin
2023-09-19  0:10                   ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2023-09-19 15:19                     ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-21  9:49                       ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-22 23:43                         ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2023-09-25 14:38                           ` Max Nikulin
2023-09-26 10:42                             ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-28 15:31                               ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2023-10-08  9:48                                 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-10-09 12:04                                   ` Max Nikulin
2023-10-09 12:12                                     ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-10-10 10:35                                       ` Max Nikulin
2023-10-12 11:35                                         ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-10-13 10:20                                           ` Max Nikulin
2023-10-14  8:13                                             ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-10-11 19:34                                   ` Rudolf Adamkovič
2024-02-05 15:41               ` [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)] Ihor Radchenko
2024-03-12 11:00                 ` Ihor Radchenko
2023-09-04 15:08     ` [DISCUSSION] May we recognize everything like [[protocol:uri]] as a non-fuzzy link? (was: [BUG] URI handling is overly complicated and nonstandard [9.6.7 (N/A @ /gnu/store/mg7223g8mw90lccp6mm5g6f3mpjk70si-emacs-org-9.6.7/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-9.6.7/)]) Max Nikulin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='ud4cs7$f66$1@ciao.gmane.io' \
    --to=manikulin@gmail.com \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).