From: Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Best android app
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 23:07:08 +0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tihabl$oof$1@ciao.gmane.io> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y0uzqVo7VLgKbFht@protected.localdomain>
On 16/10/2022 14:32, Jean Louis wrote:
> * Max Nikulin [2022-10-16 08:28]:
>> I do not have strong opinion concerning proprietary application.
>> Requirements for worg section as driven by user content are not so strict as
>> for the main part of the Org site that must adhere to FSF rules. Perhaps it
>> is possible to separate non-free software by some discouraging
>> disclaimer.
>
> If I am not mistaken, you propose or initiate discussing how to list
> proprietary software on some websites.
You are mistaken. I do not care if such discussion will happen. However
I do not mind to have a peer reviewed list somewhere. It may be helpful
to figure out what features and what workflows have not covered by free
software yet.
For me it is different to not endorse non-free software and to pretend
that such applications do not exist at all.
> GNU mailing lists are not for such discussions. GNU is project is
> there to foster full free software.
Besides it is a GNU mailing list, I believed, it is dedicated to Org. To
my surprise in this thread some lightening detector was suggested. The
original question in this topic was about a *best* app, but a response
was to search *existing* applications with no comments concerning
particular ones:
> Try these Org applications for Android:
>
> https://search.f-droid.org/?q=org+mode&lang=en
There were no details concerning usage patters in the original question,
so it is hard give suitable suggestion without requesting more
information, but such response due to lack of additional comments is
quite close to "search yourself". So from my point of view, there are
enough posts hardly relevant to the asked question.
To be clear, I think that the value of the FAQ entry is more than just
links to other projects. I see nothing wrong that the proposal to extend
the entry by ypuntot contained just links. My point is that when being
added to FAQ, the links should be augmented by comments based on usage
experience. Just extensive list of ever existed projects is hardly helpful.
P.S. Searching archives of this mailing list for particular applications
indirectly mentioned in this thread may provide some user opinions.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-16 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-15 18:31 Best android app ypuntot
2022-10-15 23:01 ` Juan Manuel Macías
2022-10-16 0:57 ` Ypo
2022-10-17 18:01 ` Max Nikulin
2022-10-17 18:33 ` Juan Manuel Macías
2022-10-16 5:26 ` Max Nikulin
2022-10-16 7:32 ` Jean Louis
2022-10-16 9:22 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-10-16 12:13 ` Juan Manuel Macías
2022-10-16 12:32 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-10-16 13:14 ` Juan Manuel Macías
2022-10-16 15:02 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-10-16 19:30 ` Juan Manuel Macías
2022-10-17 11:37 ` Jean Louis
2022-10-17 12:53 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-10-17 13:22 ` Jean Louis
2022-10-17 11:36 ` Jean Louis
2022-10-17 11:56 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-10-17 13:24 ` Jean Louis
2022-10-17 11:34 ` Jean Louis
2022-10-17 12:06 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-10-17 13:32 ` Jean Louis
2022-10-16 16:07 ` Max Nikulin [this message]
2022-10-17 11:54 ` Jean Louis
2022-10-17 13:18 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-10-17 13:38 ` Jean Louis
2022-10-19 12:49 ` Max Nikulin
2022-10-19 23:46 ` Jean Louis
2022-10-25 16:56 ` Max Nikulin
2022-10-23 4:39 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-10-23 15:27 ` Ypo
2022-10-24 9:24 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-10-25 16:17 ` Max Nikulin
2022-10-24 11:32 ` Jean Louis
2022-10-25 7:31 ` GPL violation related to Org by priprietary app (was: Best android app) Ihor Radchenko
2022-10-25 10:24 ` Jean Louis
2022-10-25 11:20 ` Ihor Radchenko
2022-10-25 13:12 ` Tim Cross
2022-10-25 13:45 ` tomas
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-14 18:16 Best android app Renato Pontefice
2022-10-14 18:30 ` Jude DaShiell
2022-10-14 18:37 ` Renato Pontefice
2022-10-14 18:52 ` Juan Manuel Macías
2022-10-14 19:08 ` Jean Louis
2022-10-15 1:16 ` Ihor Radchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='tihabl$oof$1@ciao.gmane.io' \
--to=manikulin@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).