From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp12.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id QBDnDv8sTGP1uAAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 18:10:39 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp12.migadu.com with LMTPS id uPi9Dv8sTGP1UgAAauVa8A (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 18:10:39 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E128261BE for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 18:10:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:36452 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ok6Dk-000724-8n for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 12:10:36 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:50688) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ok6Cm-0006zw-8Q for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 12:09:36 -0400 Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:44642) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ok6Ck-0007nr-NM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 12:09:36 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ok6Ci-0006ln-Lj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 16 Oct 2022 18:09:32 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org From: Max Nikulin Subject: Re: Best android app Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2022 23:07:08 +0700 Message-ID: References: <6ce1e2e6-3d21-4ee0-9e3c-80f424984a60@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: 28 X-Spam_score: 2.8 X-Spam_bar: ++ X-Spam_report: (2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA=2.309, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1665936638; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:list-id:list-help: list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post; bh=ogXsYQMbm7Hjheq2Zf6uePuy4cORfqS+OaeKqGoU+wU=; b=nG/VrrTpKZoEmkoLctXwb+djjbScqsVZvn8NRFnyKTq4AgeyeJo3t+h9MF+waZulRnxCW9 MDGpG9M56F8dHPc9+Ixts7pgfPuN3IE8Gs5ev70Ew76tunG+LBcsgYjjh1ItlATuxJ//ny LYgXvQA+MVkW6ZpuEmoXoFyxG3xz4LZnaAylmUNgeUA62yxcUpOUPvZUx1eYrrWXesrC00 U13siREipuBpw4Dpopf2MmBAlxLReubR+tvOj7Ls6KMCGyku5kVnrN6iSVEm+VK1HXIqms odwOXfzuItXjTpUs+MqO3Qy7DBiIbPAEULT0Ct9UKD39O/NXws5iKR/tbfiieA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1665936638; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QhpZY3bAQ9m90tMcI9joqNe+PTQtgheSPHnuYsrr7sk742fJBwMz/1vz8222aXJQ51Fj+r KGk2ZkLiFwgHmPTNMdBWAUFfvB0iY4lTse4UCMFVjxn3PUxRXDEANP2cUgMxlef9xAu/6A 5SIp1BDj4bkH88ixDql6v2TRGakPf/zVIKu6l+ZWScJi0h0FX5w4TqDiMnN3Sl/JtRoyr1 93U2QakATVi+r/Yx+b8SCH1m3YDnIKTvdCfkfQ8/M0DeguexpdboImMrXHvT+GQ4QCseAO Qdw9iOSODCJ5pxha3J16miA6JKF7ZQse3yWTM2XPuPrWfJ/QPQY7ymo7CbF2Yw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 2.79 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed), No valid DKIM" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 1E128261BE X-Spam-Score: 2.79 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: IaB5DGN9Yg5a On 16/10/2022 14:32, Jean Louis wrote: > * Max Nikulin [2022-10-16 08:28]: >> I do not have strong opinion concerning proprietary application. >> Requirements for worg section as driven by user content are not so strict as >> for the main part of the Org site that must adhere to FSF rules. Perhaps it >> is possible to separate non-free software by some discouraging >> disclaimer. > > If I am not mistaken, you propose or initiate discussing how to list > proprietary software on some websites. You are mistaken. I do not care if such discussion will happen. However I do not mind to have a peer reviewed list somewhere. It may be helpful to figure out what features and what workflows have not covered by free software yet. For me it is different to not endorse non-free software and to pretend that such applications do not exist at all. > GNU mailing lists are not for such discussions. GNU is project is > there to foster full free software. Besides it is a GNU mailing list, I believed, it is dedicated to Org. To my surprise in this thread some lightening detector was suggested. The original question in this topic was about a *best* app, but a response was to search *existing* applications with no comments concerning particular ones: > Try these Org applications for Android: > > https://search.f-droid.org/?q=org+mode&lang=en There were no details concerning usage patters in the original question, so it is hard give suitable suggestion without requesting more information, but such response due to lack of additional comments is quite close to "search yourself". So from my point of view, there are enough posts hardly relevant to the asked question. To be clear, I think that the value of the FAQ entry is more than just links to other projects. I see nothing wrong that the proposal to extend the entry by ypuntot contained just links. My point is that when being added to FAQ, the links should be augmented by comments based on usage experience. Just extensive list of ever existed projects is hardly helpful. P.S. Searching archives of this mailing list for particular applications indirectly mentioned in this thread may provide some user opinions.