Re: org-log-reschedule: inactive time-stamp instead

[Daimrod <daimrod@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 856 bytes --]

Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

> Hello,
>
> M <elwood151@web.de> writes:
>
>> I wonder if I get something wrong, but in the variable org-log-note-headings
>> I see
>>
>>   Heading when rescheduling
>>   String: Rescheduled from %S on %t
>> Shouldn't the %S represent a TODO state (which makes no sense)?
>
> %S represents the last "state". If you change a TODO keyword, is also
> a TODO keyword (or lack thereof). If you alter a timestamp, it is that
> timestamp.
>
>> Can I replace it by an inactive timestamp?
>
> Is there any use case for an active timestamp at this location anyway?
> If there is not, we could automatically convert it to an inactive
> timestamp.
>
> WDYT?

I don't have any use for an active location here. IMO it clutters the agenda
with senseless entries.

Best,

-- 
Daimrod/Greg

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]