From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daimrod Subject: Re: org-log-reschedule: inactive time-stamp instead Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 14:01:50 +0200 Message-ID: <87zj3iyb81.fsf@gmail.com> References: <2014-12-16T18-21-20@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <877fxr5kot.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <2014-12-17T10-01-43@devnull.Karl-Voit.at> <87k2usx9lz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35623) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z9XlA-0007cM-6B for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 08:02:00 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z9Xl5-0005en-8m for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 08:02:00 -0400 Received: from smtptls2-lmb.cpub.univ-nantes.fr ([193.52.103.111]:60349 helo=smtp-tls.univ-nantes.fr) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z9Xl5-0005ay-3d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Jun 2015 08:01:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87k2usx9lz.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Thu, 25 Jun 2015 14:20:40 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > M writes: > >> I wonder if I get something wrong, but in the variable org-log-note-head= ings >> I see >> >> Heading when rescheduling >> String: Rescheduled from %S on %t >> Shouldn't the %S represent a TODO state (which makes no sense)? > > %S represents the last "state". If you change a TODO keyword, is also > a TODO keyword (or lack thereof). If you alter a timestamp, it is that > timestamp. > >> Can I replace it by an inactive timestamp? > > Is there any use case for an active timestamp at this location anyway? > If there is not, we could automatically convert it to an inactive > timestamp. > > WDYT? I don't have any use for an active location here. IMO it clutters the agenda with senseless entries. Best, =2D-=20 Daimrod/Greg --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVkTOuAAoJEBNzVHcrZRiUbTwP/i2G6lBblEKHXTLGqgkT3wZ3 hDQe4/e/P58L+krvs+mW+EHVvTjOkunUbEkDBFTqB+zd1mFOxR8b4Y+9G5Q//iOp 5vss2QXuPiNdpeHb4xPT2L2V1Pa/CTYKP0Q2x2f/AArZifQTzvC8NuiPiKVIObT0 sWarfwiym2KkmIizAAW8783BEnchor8kZjnpsorT05ZG0kHnGvGEJi8eLu6ntn9+ T7pPUCCGCTy0ru4buyOVl+vLeUTVl8S8Melyt2cUlZgIQ+9exCZzbVs8WIFexgyy fpG2Imp81l9N3XWazAXeTqVPcqhNPQGG+E79wYcWe3fs5bDWn4tSEwf6gCWMlqkl gcd00li0DVQghukaJgTYNVggi3Drw0SxUsflJ/YmErhTZQvOuL2ruIZXRkvwG4Zk jPOYbResAN22xw1ZslQz6lXaR2nQatsoM4aPOiNEoqLDGRooPHObULg1E7SgpsGM t8J6gVrFJaSqiru+ZEUdn6iK1varwPTCzvoJ4GCCOU9v3v8t2q3dGe9y1XMty5vl 6JpE3N4zgC2/Y3a7AiGCAZs0RCOZXU+N+cAqIwEK0mXyREYiXVg4JAl6srbDumqa g+9jbiGUDC+S0qDVQm6jBwRxn0C3wAz1BNaL6oiIKOqPBmuL32FBUpQbTLIjfaHa AGSBNK5QGgpzjs5unJFD =gbAZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--