From: Torsten Wagner <torsten.wagner@gmail.com>
To: Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: org-babel: Meta-LaTeX-Python-Environment
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 13:27:09 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200910261327.09576.torsten.wagner@googlemail.com> (raw)
Hi,
I started working on an little latex-package to allow the execution of python
code in LaTeX a while ago. It stopped at some point and now it is on my
pending project lists for a while already.
When I read about org-babel I saw a lot of similarities. I like to start again
on the basis of org-babel and trying to accomplish the following idea.
Within a LaTeX-file (org-file) I like to use python snippets to perform calculus
and other tasks which are otherwise extremely difficult or time consuming to
perform directly in LaTeX. E.g. on-the-fly-generation of graphs or calculus of
statistical values (e.g., (very simple) the mean value of n numbers).
I guess org-mode together with org-babel can do most of this already. I played
around with it and it is very nice, many thanks to the developers. However, I
found the following point which I wasn't able to figure out yet.
1. Hiding of the source code blocks for export
I like to export the results of the source code block to LaTeX only. However,
I tried different options all resulting in embedding the source-code itself
inside the final LaTeX file. I guess this is more due to the org-export function
rather then org-babel
2. Inline source code blocks
I guess this was discussed once already. Instead of a verbose source code
block a single short command to elaborate a python variable or a one line
calculus would be nice e.g., "#:session_name a#" to replace this command by
the results of variable a of the session session_name during the export to
LaTeX.
I like to combine this with a little python module specialised in creating
proper LaTeX export for all kind of python data types.
E.g. tab_export([1,2,3,4,5]) could generate the string "1 & 2 & 3 & 4 & 5 \\"
The idea is to use this as a form of reproducible research allowing the data
evaluation together with the textual and graphical representation.
Furthermore, I would like to use org as a publication system with meta-
description capabilities. This would allow to commentary what someone is doing
"between the lines". By this one could merge somehow the lab-book, data
analysis and the final paper into one org-file (or org-project) and keep always
all infos and data close together
Something like (pseudo code):
/---------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
12.03.2148: Scotty
I'm going to create a better warp drive system:
...
First measurements should show the better efficiency. The old set-up is moved to
the lab downstairs .... the old measurement files back-up is at ....
First lets load the values and calculate the performance:
#+srcname: measurement
#+begin_src python
data=load(measurement.csv)
perf = calculate_performance(data.values)
#+end_src
This was the final measurement performed with the new set-up. It shows already
the nice improvements...
Just some infos of the measurement
Measurement date: #:measurement data.date#
Measurement parameter: #:measurement data.param1#
13.3.2148: Scotty
Spoke told me it could be better by performing a new warp-core calibration...
However, I could write the abstract already:
#+srcname: paper_for_star_fleet_physics_journal
#+begin_src LaTeX
\begin{abstract}
.... the new set-up shows a $#:measurement perf#,/%$ better perfomance then
the old warp drive...
\end{abstract}
#+end_src
13.04.2148: Scotty
Finally I applied the calibration as Spoke said but results are not better.
Results can be found here _link_ but will not be published yet... lost one
month... will kick some Vulcans ass ...
Let's continuous with the graphs I need for figure 4...
...
...
...
/--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------/
I hope this gives an idea of what I like to do. :)
Export should allow selections like "export all" (including comment texts and
source code blocks), "export without source code blocks" and "export results
only". The last one would produce the native LaTeX code ready for submission.
This would allow to process the file with any standard LaTeX environment.
I know there is the tangle function. However, it would require a LaTeX-source
block for org-babel. Creating one would result in the problem that I have to
replace spaceholders within the LaTeX-code blocks with the results of python-
blocks (as shown in the example).
It would be nice to hear if someone is doing something similar or if somebody
has some ideas how to accomplish this with org-mode and org-babel
Best regards,
Torsten
CC. Sorry for the long mail
next reply other threads:[~2009-10-26 4:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-26 4:27 Torsten Wagner [this message]
2009-10-27 0:24 ` org-babel: Meta-LaTeX-Python-Environment Dan Davison
2009-10-27 8:23 ` Thomas S. Dye
2009-10-27 14:57 ` Torsten Wagner
2009-10-27 22:55 ` Eric Schulte
2009-10-28 0:40 ` Thomas S. Dye
2009-10-28 15:19 ` Eric Schulte
2009-10-28 16:10 ` [babel] " Dan Davison
2009-10-28 16:49 ` Dan Davison
2009-10-28 16:52 ` Thomas S. Dye
2009-10-28 17:15 ` Eric Schulte
2009-10-28 18:46 ` Thomas S. Dye
2009-10-28 22:19 ` Eric Schulte
2009-10-29 6:55 ` Thomas S. Dye
2009-10-28 16:25 ` Thomas S. Dye
2009-10-27 13:29 ` Torsten Wagner
2009-10-29 15:52 ` [babel] Meta-LaTeX-Python-Environment Dan Davison
[not found] ` <4edb2bbc0910270625ybce9255nf569b5e250d061e1@mail.gmail.com>
2009-10-28 16:57 ` org-babel: Meta-LaTeX-Python-Environment Dan Davison
2009-10-29 4:52 ` [babel]org-babel: Meta-LaTeX-Python-Environment Torsten Wagner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200910261327.09576.torsten.wagner@googlemail.com \
--to=torsten.wagner@gmail.com \
--cc=Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).