* Feature request: HTML table formatting
@ 2007-04-11 23:17 Daniel J. Sinder
2007-04-12 11:20 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel J. Sinder @ 2007-04-11 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Generally, I like the latest incarnation of HTML table formatting,
in particular because I can control the presence of horizontal
lines. But, now I'm spoiled and would like to do the same for
vertical lines -- on a table-by-table basis. With the rules=groups
attribute (already the default with org-mode), this can be
accomplished in HTML using the COLGROUP element.
What about a new column delimiter (e.g., '!') to indicate column
groups in addition to columns? My hope is to have something like
the following be possible:
! ! Col A | Col B | Col C !
!--------!---------|---------|--------!
! Row 1 ! A1 | B1 | C1 !
! Row 2 ! A2 | B2 | C2 !
!--------!---------|---------|--------!
The '!' lines would appear in the HTML rendering, while the "|"
lines would not. Or, as an ASCII export:
|-------+---------+---------+--------|
| | Col A | Col B | Col C |
|-------+---------+---------+--------|
| Row 1 | A1 B1 C1 |
| Row 2 | A2 B2 C2 |
|-------+----------------------------|
Dan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Feature request: HTML table formatting
2007-04-11 23:17 Feature request: HTML table formatting Daniel J. Sinder
@ 2007-04-12 11:20 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-04-12 12:21 ` Matej Cepl
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-04-12 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel J. Sinder; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
I don't like the idea of another character having
special meaning in tables. We would have to find
a different way to specify this.
- Carsten
On Apr 12, 2007, at 1:17, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
>
> The '!' lines would appear in the HTML rendering, while the "|"
> lines would not. Or, as an ASCII export:
> |-------+---------+---------+--------|
> | | Col A | Col B | Col C |
> |-------+---------+---------+--------|
> | Row 1 | A1 B1 C1 |
> | Row 2 | A2 B2 C2 |
> |-------+----------------------------|
Personally I think that also in this case, but generally in most cases,
Col A Col B Col C
--------------------------------
Row 1 A1 B1 C1
Row 2 A2 B2 C2
looks much better.
- Carsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Feature request: HTML table formatting
2007-04-12 11:20 ` Carsten Dominik
@ 2007-04-12 12:21 ` Matej Cepl
2007-04-12 13:42 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-04-12 18:48 ` Daniel J. Sinder
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Matej Cepl @ 2007-04-12 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes:
> I don't like the idea of another character having
> special meaning in tables. We would have to find
> a different way to specify this.
To the presentation of tables I would strongly suggest reading
http://tug.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/booktabs/booktabs.pdf
-- whenever I broke rules set there, I regreted it later.
Best,
Matej
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Feature request: HTML table formatting
2007-04-12 12:21 ` Matej Cepl
@ 2007-04-12 13:42 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-04-12 18:48 ` Daniel J. Sinder
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-04-12 13:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matej Cepl; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
On Apr 12, 2007, at 14:21, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes:
>> I don't like the idea of another character having
>> special meaning in tables. We would have to find
>> a different way to specify this.
>
> To the presentation of tables I would strongly suggest reading
> http://tug.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/booktabs/
> booktabs.pdf
> -- whenever I broke rules set there, I regreted it later.
This is also consistent with what the Chicago Manual of Style
has to say about tables:
13.53 Vertical rules
Vertical rules should be used only to avoid confusion — for
example, when a table is doubled up. Their use between all
columns has long been abandoned.
I do understand the need to group columns visually, so I would be
interested in a syntax to do this. But for the implementation in
an export backend, would prefer spanner heads. Again from the
Chicago Manual:
13.22 Spanner heads
When a table demands column heads of two or more
levels — when related columns require both a collective
head and individual heads—spanner heads, or spanners
(sometimes called decked heads), are used. A horizontal
rule, called a spanner rule, appears between the spanner
and the column heads to show which columns the spanner
applies to. For ease of reading, spanner heads should
seldom exceed two levels.
- Carsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Feature request: HTML table formatting
2007-04-12 12:21 ` Matej Cepl
2007-04-12 13:42 ` Carsten Dominik
@ 2007-04-12 18:48 ` Daniel J. Sinder
2007-04-13 4:23 ` Carsten Dominik
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Daniel J. Sinder @ 2007-04-12 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matej Cepl; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Matej Cepl wrote:
> To the presentation of tables I would strongly suggest reading
> http://tug.ctan.org/tex-archive/macros/latex/contrib/booktabs/booktabs.pdf
> -- whenever I broke rules set there, I regreted it later.
For publication quality tables, as per the above reference, I would
generally agree that vertical lines have no place. However, if
you're using org-mode to produce publication quality tables, I'd
argue that you're probably using the wrong tool. LaTeX (and all the
emacs support for it) is probably the way to go from the start.
In some respects, org-mode tables are more powerful than LaTeX
tables as they can be used as spreadsheets. I use org mode on a
near-daily basis to collect information about my work and share it
with my colleagues for analysis. The information is sometimes raw
data that will never (and should never) be consumed for casual
reading. In some of these cases, I find that vertical separators
can increase readability and/or delineate different test conditions
or data sets.
I think rejecting vertical rules as a matter of style is a mistake.
Whether you consider org-mode tables to be a markup or a
spreadsheet, it's peers -- HTML, LaTeX, Gnumeric, Excel, etc. --
will all produce tables with vertical rules if asked to do so. I'm
wary of tools that enforce style. I'd prefer to read the style
guide and then decide for myself (that is, use it as a *guide* not
an edict).
However, if vertical rules are too clunky, difficult,
time-consuming, or low priority to implement, that's an entirely
different matter that I can fully understand. If I come up with an
implementation, I'll gladly contribute it back for those that want it.
Dan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Feature request: HTML table formatting
2007-04-12 18:48 ` Daniel J. Sinder
@ 2007-04-13 4:23 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-04-13 4:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel J. Sinder; +Cc: Matej Cepl, emacs-orgmode
On Apr 12, 2007, at 20:48, Daniel J. Sinder wrote:
>
> I think rejecting vertical rules as a matter of style is a mistake.
> Whether you consider org-mode tables to be a markup or a
> spreadsheet, it's peers -- HTML, LaTeX, Gnumeric, Excel, etc. --
> will all produce tables with vertical rules if asked to do so. I'm
> wary of tools that enforce style. I'd prefer to read the style
> guide and then decide for myself (that is, use it as a *guide* not
> an edict).
Fair enough.
> However, if vertical rules are too clunky, difficult,
> time-consuming, or low priority to implement, that's an entirely
> different matter that I can fully understand.
As I said, I don't want to have a special separator for this,
implementation would be very cumbersome and I'd like
to be able to have ! as a character in a table field.
Maybe something like a special #+FORMAT line above the table
to set special formatting directives.
- Carsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Feature request: HTML table formatting
@ 2007-04-27 16:09 Scott Otterson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Scott Otterson @ 2007-04-27 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 2870 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 149 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: Feature request: HTML table formatting
@ 2007-04-27 16:09 Scott Otterson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Scott Otterson @ 2007-04-27 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/html, Size: 2870 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 149 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-04-27 16:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-04-11 23:17 Feature request: HTML table formatting Daniel J. Sinder
2007-04-12 11:20 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-04-12 12:21 ` Matej Cepl
2007-04-12 13:42 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-04-12 18:48 ` Daniel J. Sinder
2007-04-13 4:23 ` Carsten Dominik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-04-27 16:09 Scott Otterson
2007-04-27 16:09 Scott Otterson
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).