Re: searchable refcard?

From: Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>
To: "Alan E. Davis" <lngndvs@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org,
	Nathaniel Cunningham <nathaniel.cunningham@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: searchable refcard?
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2008 14:06:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <FFE39BA3-95F3-4DCA-9ACA-90969260CC38@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7bef1f890812010456i5c5a1542l8b2bdef7ca3e209c@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1194 bytes --]

On Dec 1, 2008, at 1:56 PM, Alan E. Davis wrote:

> That all is a great help.  I like both ideas, but at the present it  
> is much easier for me to go through orgcard.tex and study the info  
> docs.  I think I have some mistakes in this, but it's been an  
> interesting study to carefully comb through one or two headlines'  
> worth (Agenda and clocking) and add something for my own use on  
> relative clocks.
>
> It helps alot to study the info docs while going through this, but I  
> cannot do it all in one sitthing.  Perhaps it's helpful to separate  
> some of the commands where three variants are on one line to save  
> space---it sure helps me to make sense of each of them.
>
> I might ask, in cases where there is a discrepancy between the  
> orgcard and the info docs, which one is up to date?  My guess would  
> be the info docs, but I'm guessing.

Please collect these differences and send them to me, I will check.   
Likely, the manual is more up to date.

- Carsten

>
>
> Attached is another pass at "org-help.org".
>
> Alan
>
>
> -- 
> Alan Davis
>
> "It's never a matter of liking or disliking ..."
>       ---Santa Ynez Chumash Medicine Man
>
> <org-help.org>

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 1640 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 204 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode