From: Iannis Zannos <zannos@gmail.com>
To: Andreas Leha <andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de>
Cc: ML Emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 22:13:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEC5JkK92-Fjw-1FY9W+S3YkzxXo6ABovUSshtYhd3nQwP4LUA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87wqhid034.fsf@med.uni-goettingen.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2019 bytes --]
Agree.
To do my own rebindings i use this kind of code:
(eval-after-load 'org
'(define-key org-mode-map (kbd "C-c C-=") 'org-icicle-imenu))
But when re-opening a buffer with desktop after rebooting emacs, the
new bindings are not added
IZ
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 10:06 PM, Andreas Leha <
andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de> wrote:
> Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Hi Nick,
> >
> > Nick Dokos <ndokos@gmail.com> writes:
> >
> >> I find myself more in agreement with Seb than with Bastien here. The
> >> argument that reducing the number of "bad" bindings reduces the chance
> >> of conflicts does not hold water IMO: we will always have to be looking
> >> in the rear-view mirror for some minor mode that will step on us.
> >
> > In the last ten years, we had only *one* such problem while having a
> > dozen of faulty keybindings --- my hope is that, with only a fistful
> > of faulty keybindings, we won't have to look in the rear-view mirror
> > for the next twenty years :) [IOW: I don't buy the all-or-nothing
> > reasoning.]
> >
>
> I might be missing something here. But I think it would not be a
> problem for Bastien (and others with similar preferences) to rebind the
> keys to the shorter and potentially problematic version. So to me it
> seems, that the only problem with making the default keybindings less
> 'offensive' is finding non-taken and non-offensive keybindings.
>
> The question is whether Org could do something to make rebinding keys
> easier? Like a worg page / FAQ about 'getting the old keybindings
> back', maybe?
>
> Just my 2ct, of course.
> - Andreas
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > More precisely, I suggest these rebindings:
> >
> > C-c # Checkboxes => C-c C-#
> > C-c , Priorities => C-c C-,
> > C-c ; Comment lines => C-c C-;
> > C-c @ Mark subtree => C-c C-@
> >
> > (Note they are also accessible through speedy keys.)
> >
> > C-c ~ Cooperation => C-c C-~
> >
> > (This one I just discovered.)
> >
> > Let's not get trapped in a "buridanesque" decision. :)
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3448 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-29 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-23 4:45 org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions? Drew Adams
2014-01-23 7:43 ` Bastien
2014-01-23 15:33 ` Drew Adams
2014-01-23 15:46 ` Bastien
2014-01-23 16:28 ` Drew Adams
2014-01-23 16:34 ` Bastien
2014-01-23 17:01 ` Drew Adams
2014-01-23 22:24 ` Bastien
2014-01-23 22:56 ` Drew Adams
2014-01-23 23:29 ` Thomas S. Dye
2014-01-24 8:39 ` Bastien
2014-01-25 7:34 ` Thomas S. Dye
2014-01-28 9:08 ` Bastien
2014-01-29 8:43 ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-01-29 9:39 ` Bastien
2014-01-29 10:35 ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-01-29 11:00 ` Bastien
2014-01-29 11:32 ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-01-29 17:34 ` Thomas S. Dye
2014-01-29 17:48 ` Bastien
2014-01-29 19:48 ` Thomas S. Dye
2014-01-29 20:11 ` Iannis Zannos
2014-01-30 0:39 ` Bastien
2014-01-29 11:44 ` Florian Beck
2014-01-29 13:16 ` Nick Dokos
2014-01-29 13:52 ` Bastien
2014-01-29 18:01 ` Achim Gratz
2014-01-29 20:06 ` Andreas Leha
2014-01-29 20:13 ` Iannis Zannos [this message]
2014-01-29 14:43 ` Florian Beck
2014-01-29 15:40 ` Bastien
2014-01-29 16:20 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-01-23 13:57 ` Alan Schmitt
2014-01-23 15:33 ` Drew Adams
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-18 19:49 John Kitchin
2014-01-18 21:40 ` Alan Schmitt
2014-01-19 15:53 ` Bastien
2014-01-19 17:31 ` Memnon Anon
2014-01-19 20:56 ` John Kitchin
2014-01-20 2:34 ` Memnon Anon
2014-01-20 23:12 ` Alan Schmitt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAEC5JkK92-Fjw-1FY9W+S3YkzxXo6ABovUSshtYhd3nQwP4LUA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=zannos@gmail.com \
--cc=andreas.leha@med.uni-goettingen.de \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).