emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Sebastien Vauban" <sva-news-D0wtAvR13HarG/iDocfnWg@public.gmane.org>
To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions?
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2014 09:43:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86lhxz6uw8.fsf@somewhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87bnywtqx4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx

Hello Bastien and Thomas,

Bastien wrote:
> thanks for starting this list.
>
> tsd-P0awH739Ni4AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
>
>> C-c ! Creating timestamps
>> C-c . Creating timestamps
>> C-c # Checkboxes
>> C-c ' Editing and debugging formulas, literal examples, include files,
>> editing source code, cooperation
>> C-c , Priorities
>> C-c ; Comment lines
>> C-c ? Editing and debugging formulas
>> C-c @ Structure editing 
>> C-c ^ Structure editing, plain lists, built-in table editor
>> C-c ` Built-in table editor
>> C-c ~ Cooperation
>
> (There is also C-c : (to add QUOTE) but doomed to disappear anyway.)

What about `C-c {' and such in the tables?

> I think most of these keybindings could migrate to a C-c C- version.
>
> For example:
>
> C-c # Checkboxes
>
> would be
>
> C-c C-# Checkboxes
>
> this would work for all of them except C-c ^ beause C-c C-^ is
> already bound to org-up-element.  Maybe it can move to C-c M-^
> instead (but that's one of the keybindings that is deeply into
> my memory.)

So is it for me. As half of the above mentioned key bindings -- the
other half, I don't know/use it.

> How would everyone feel about moving those keybindings to comply
> more closely with Emacs coding recommendations?

I guess it's better to comply to the Emacs guidelines. That change will
allow us to wake up our neurons and fight against Alzheimer. So, let's
do it.

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban

  reply	other threads:[~2014-01-29  8:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-23  4:45 org-mode + icicles, avoid key binding redefinitions? Drew Adams
2014-01-23  7:43 ` Bastien
2014-01-23 15:33   ` Drew Adams
2014-01-23 15:46     ` Bastien
2014-01-23 16:28       ` Drew Adams
2014-01-23 16:34         ` Bastien
2014-01-23 17:01           ` Drew Adams
2014-01-23 22:24             ` Bastien
2014-01-23 22:56               ` Drew Adams
2014-01-23 23:29               ` Thomas S. Dye
2014-01-24  8:39                 ` Bastien
2014-01-25  7:34                   ` Thomas S. Dye
2014-01-28  9:08                     ` Bastien
2014-01-29  8:43                       ` Sebastien Vauban [this message]
2014-01-29  9:39                         ` Bastien
2014-01-29 10:35                           ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-01-29 11:00                             ` Bastien
2014-01-29 11:32                               ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-01-29 17:34                         ` Thomas S. Dye
2014-01-29 17:48                           ` Bastien
2014-01-29 19:48                             ` Thomas S. Dye
2014-01-29 20:11                               ` Iannis Zannos
2014-01-30  0:39                               ` Bastien
2014-01-29 11:44                       ` Florian Beck
2014-01-29 13:16                         ` Nick Dokos
2014-01-29 13:52                           ` Bastien
2014-01-29 18:01                             ` Achim Gratz
2014-01-29 20:06                             ` Andreas Leha
2014-01-29 20:13                               ` Iannis Zannos
2014-01-29 14:43                           ` Florian Beck
2014-01-29 15:40                             ` Bastien
2014-01-29 16:20                               ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-01-23 13:57 ` Alan Schmitt
2014-01-23 15:33   ` Drew Adams
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-01-18 19:49 John Kitchin
2014-01-18 21:40 ` Alan Schmitt
2014-01-19 15:53 ` Bastien
2014-01-19 17:31 ` Memnon Anon
2014-01-19 20:56   ` John Kitchin
2014-01-20  2:34     ` Memnon Anon
2014-01-20 23:12       ` Alan Schmitt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86lhxz6uw8.fsf@somewhere.org \
    --to=sva-news-d0wtavr13harg/idocfnwg@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).