* undo in org.el
@ 2007-11-12 21:23 Leo
2007-11-13 9:03 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Leo @ 2007-11-12 21:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Dear all,
[a suggestion]
I seem to recall some time ago there were some discussions about undo
changes. for example, if I archive a subtree and then undo, the archived
substree will be restored to its original .org file but is also archived
in the _archive.org file. i.e. the undo is incomplete.
We can use the following to make the archive action one atomic change.
,----[ (info "(elisp)Atomic Changes") ]
| If you need something more sophisticated, such as to make changes in
| various buffers constitute one atomic group, you must directly call
| lower-level functions that `atomic-change-group' uses.
`----
HTH,
--
.: Leo :. [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ] .: [ GPG Key: 9283AA3F ] :.
Use the most powerful email client -- http://gnus.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: undo in org.el
2007-11-12 21:23 undo in org.el Leo
@ 2007-11-13 9:03 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-13 11:44 ` Tim O'Callaghan
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-11-13 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leo; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if it is
still worth supporting it....
- Carsten
On 12Nov2007, at 10:23 PM, Leo wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> [a suggestion]
>
> I seem to recall some time ago there were some discussions about undo
> changes. for example, if I archive a subtree and then undo, the
> archived
> substree will be restored to its original .org file but is also
> archived
> in the _archive.org file. i.e. the undo is incomplete.
>
> We can use the following to make the archive action one atomic change.
>
> ,----[ (info "(elisp)Atomic Changes") ]
> | If you need something more sophisticated, such as to make
> changes in
> | various buffers constitute one atomic group, you must directly call
> | lower-level functions that `atomic-change-group' uses.
> `----
>
> HTH,
> --
> .: Leo :. [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ] .: [ GPG Key: 9283AA3F ] :.
>
> Use the most powerful email client -- http://gnus.org/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: undo in org.el
2007-11-13 9:03 ` Carsten Dominik
@ 2007-11-13 11:44 ` Tim O'Callaghan
2007-11-13 15:28 ` Ed Hirgelt
` (2 more replies)
2007-11-13 12:15 ` Dr. Volker Zell
2007-11-13 12:19 ` Stefan Kamphausen
2 siblings, 3 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Tim O'Callaghan @ 2007-11-13 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> wrote:
> Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
> multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
> easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
>
> Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if it is
> still worth supporting it....
>
>
> - Carsten
>
If that was a call to Xemacs users to identify themselves, then here
is one. Even though it is in the Emacs CVS tree now should not turn it
into an Emacs only tool IMHO.
Tim.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: undo in org.el
2007-11-13 11:44 ` Tim O'Callaghan
@ 2007-11-13 15:28 ` Ed Hirgelt
2007-11-13 15:37 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-13 22:50 ` Wes Nakamura
2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Ed Hirgelt @ 2007-11-13 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 310 bytes --]
Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
>
> If that was a call to Xemacs users to identify themselves, then here
> is one. Even though it is in the Emacs CVS tree now should not turn it
> into an Emacs only tool IMHO.
>
Another XEmacs user raising his hand -- please keep XEmacs compatibility.
Thanks,
Ed
--
Ed Hirgelt
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 753 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 204 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: undo in org.el
2007-11-13 11:44 ` Tim O'Callaghan
2007-11-13 15:28 ` Ed Hirgelt
@ 2007-11-13 15:37 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-13 20:58 ` Leo
2007-11-15 11:45 ` Dr. Volker Zell
2007-11-13 22:50 ` Wes Nakamura
2 siblings, 2 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-11-13 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tim O'Callaghan; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
On 13Nov2007, at 12:44 PM, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
> On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> wrote:
>> Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
>> multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
>> easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
>>
>> Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if it is
>> still worth supporting it....
>>
>>
>> - Carsten
>>
>
> If that was a call to Xemacs users to identify themselves, then here
> is one. Even though it is in the Emacs CVS tree now should not turn it
> into an Emacs only tool IMHO.
Well, the fact that it is in Emacs CVS has not kept me from
supporting XEmacs for quite a while now. But it is extra work and
requires catering for missing features and different implementations
- so it is important for me to know that this is used and still
appreciated.
How about someone stepping forward and trying to release an XEmacs
package containing noutline.el and org-mode? Anyone who feels up to
this? Because I will not have the time.
- Carsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: undo in org.el
2007-11-13 15:37 ` Carsten Dominik
@ 2007-11-13 20:58 ` Leo
2007-11-13 22:12 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-15 11:45 ` Dr. Volker Zell
1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Leo @ 2007-11-13 20:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
On 2007-11-13 15:37 +0000, Carsten Dominik wrote:
[...]
>> If that was a call to Xemacs users to identify themselves, then here
>> is one. Even though it is in the Emacs CVS tree now should not turn it
>> into an Emacs only tool IMHO.
>
> Well, the fact that it is in Emacs CVS has not kept me from supporting
> XEmacs for quite a while now. But it is extra work and requires
> catering for missing features and different implementations - so it is
> important for me to know that this is used and still appreciated.
>
> How about someone stepping forward and trying to release an XEmacs
> package containing noutline.el and org-mode? Anyone who feels up to
> this? Because I will not have the time.
>
> - Carsten
I think org 5.13 (or maybe 5.14) can be used by XEmacs users for
foreseeable feature. Remember XEmacs is packaging quite a few outdated
package anyway such as AUCTeX (11.5x).
If no one steps up for this task, we should start thinking of moving
forward anyway.
HTH,
--
.: Leo :. [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ] .: [ GPG Key: 9283AA3F ] :.
Use the best OS -- http://www.fedoraproject.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: Re: undo in org.el
2007-11-13 20:58 ` Leo
@ 2007-11-13 22:12 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-11-13 22:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Leo; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
On 13Nov2007, at 9:58 PM, Leo wrote:
> On 2007-11-13 15:37 +0000, Carsten Dominik wrote:
> [...]
>>> If that was a call to Xemacs users to identify themselves, then here
>>> is one. Even though it is in the Emacs CVS tree now should not
>>> turn it
>>> into an Emacs only tool IMHO.
>>
>> Well, the fact that it is in Emacs CVS has not kept me from
>> supporting
>> XEmacs for quite a while now. But it is extra work and requires
>> catering for missing features and different implementations - so
>> it is
>> important for me to know that this is used and still appreciated.
>>
>> How about someone stepping forward and trying to release an XEmacs
>> package containing noutline.el and org-mode? Anyone who feels up to
>> this? Because I will not have the time.
>>
>> - Carsten
>
> I think org 5.13 (or maybe 5.14) can be used by XEmacs users for
> foreseeable feature. Remember XEmacs is packaging quite a few outdated
> package anyway such as AUCTeX (11.5x).
>
> If no one steps up for this task, we should start thinking of moving
> forward anyway.
I am not sure what you mean by "moving forward". Sure, the world can
survive withoout an XEmacs package for Org-mode.
However, even if the package would not be up-to-date, it would be
nice if XEmacs users would get some version simply with the sumo
tarball. Would lower the the entry borders quite a bit in my
opinion. Lets not forget that not everyone is as happy to download a
new version of a package frequently as we are here...
Anyway, just a thought. I will continue to support XEmacs as much as
I can, within the limits of available time. But that support already
has some holes, most importantly columns view does not work with it
and the difficulties to make it work are so substantial that I am not
expecting to ever get around to it.
We should all thank Gregory Chernov again for porting noutline to
XEmacs - without that I would have given up long ago.
- Carsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: undo in org.el
2007-11-13 15:37 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-13 20:58 ` Leo
@ 2007-11-15 11:45 ` Dr. Volker Zell
2007-11-15 11:55 ` Carsten Dominik
1 sibling, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Dr. Volker Zell @ 2007-11-15 11:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: Tim O'Callaghan, emacs-orgmode
>>>>> Carsten Dominik writes:
> On 13Nov2007, at 12:44 PM, Tim O'Callaghan wrote:
>> On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> wrote:
>>> Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
>>> multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
>>> easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
>>>
>>> Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if it is
>>> still worth supporting it....
>>>
>>>
>>> - Carsten
>>>
>>
>> If that was a call to Xemacs users to identify themselves, then here
>> is one. Even though it is in the Emacs CVS tree now should not turn it
>> into an Emacs only tool IMHO.
> Well, the fact that it is in Emacs CVS has not kept me from
> supporting XEmacs for quite a while now. But it is extra work and
> requires catering for missing features and different implementations
> - so it is important for me to know that this is used and still
> appreciated.
> How about someone stepping forward and trying to release an XEmacs
> package containing noutline.el and org-mode? Anyone who feels up to
> this? Because I will not have the time.
I'm already maintaing XEmacs for cygwin. I will give it a try and ask on
the XEmacs list how to proceed. At least I will release an org-mode
package with the xemacs-sumo on cygwin.
> - Carsten
Ciao
Volker
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: undo in org.el
2007-11-15 11:45 ` Dr. Volker Zell
@ 2007-11-15 11:55 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-11-15 11:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dr. Volker Zell; +Cc: Tim O'Callaghan, emacs-orgmode
On 15Nov2007, at 12:45 PM, Dr. Volker Zell wrote:
>
>> How about someone stepping forward and trying to release an XEmacs
>> package containing noutline.el and org-mode? Anyone who feels up to
>> this? Because I will not have the time.
>
> I'm already maintaing XEmacs for cygwin. I will give it a try and
> ask on
> the XEmacs list how to proceed. At least I will release an org-mode
> package with the xemacs-sumo on cygwin.
Hi Volker, that would be great. I guess that things should be pretty
much straight forward. The only stumbling point might be
noutline.el, and the question if it will lead to conflicts with
normal outline. Should be compatible, but who knows.
Thanks!
- Carsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: undo in org.el
2007-11-13 11:44 ` Tim O'Callaghan
2007-11-13 15:28 ` Ed Hirgelt
2007-11-13 15:37 ` Carsten Dominik
@ 2007-11-13 22:50 ` Wes Nakamura
[not found] ` <E6B22961-FEA9-4D09-9743-64202CB7DB8D@science.uva.nl>
` (2 more replies)
2 siblings, 3 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Wes Nakamura @ 2007-11-13 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
| On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> wrote:
| > Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
| > multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
| > easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
| >
| > Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if it is
| > still worth supporting it....
| >
| >
| > - Carsten
| >
Another XEmacs user here. On XEmacs I like being able to have a
default variable width font in the org-mode buffer but still have the
calendar, etc, come up in a monospace font in a different buffer in the
same frame. I haven't been able to do this in Emacs since I believe
fonts are not buffer local but applied to a frame.
Wes
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread[parent not found: <E6B22961-FEA9-4D09-9743-64202CB7DB8D@science.uva.nl>]
* Re: undo in org.el
[not found] ` <E6B22961-FEA9-4D09-9743-64202CB7DB8D@science.uva.nl>
@ 2007-11-14 8:08 ` Carsten Dominik
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-11-14 8:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
On 14Nov2007, at 12:17 AM, Carsten Dominik wrote:
>
> On 13Nov2007, at 11:50 PM, Wes Nakamura wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> | On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> wrote:
>> | > Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
>> | > multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks
>> much
>> | > easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
>> | >
>> | > Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if
>> it is
>> | > still worth supporting it....
>> | >
>> | >
>> | > - Carsten
>> | >
>>
>> Another XEmacs user here. On XEmacs I like being able to have a
>> default variable width font in the org-mode buffer but still have the
>> calendar, etc, come up in a monospace font in a different buffer
>> in the
>> same frame. I haven't been able to do this in Emacs since I believe
>> fonts are not buffer local but applied to a frame.
>
>
> Yes, XEmacs has many great features. I did use it for many years
> as my main Emacs.
>
> - Carsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: undo in org.el
2007-11-13 22:50 ` Wes Nakamura
[not found] ` <E6B22961-FEA9-4D09-9743-64202CB7DB8D@science.uva.nl>
@ 2007-11-14 8:13 ` Tassilo Horn
2007-11-14 15:02 ` William Henney
2007-11-14 9:02 ` Carsten Dominik
2 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Tassilo Horn @ 2007-11-14 8:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
Wes Nakamura <wknaka@pobox.com> writes:
Hi Wes,
> On XEmacs I like being able to have a default variable width font in
> the org-mode buffer but still have the calendar, etc, come up in a
> monospace font in a different buffer in the same frame. I haven't
> been able to do this in Emacs since I believe fonts are not buffer
> local but applied to a frame.
That's wrong. You can mix as many proportional and variable width faces
in one buffer as you whish. For example you could use big variable
width fonts for org headlines and small proportional fonts for the
normal content.
Simply set point on the face you want to change and hit `M-x
customize-face RET'.
Bye,
Tassilo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: Re: undo in org.el
2007-11-14 8:13 ` Tassilo Horn
@ 2007-11-14 15:02 ` William Henney
2007-11-14 19:46 ` Tassilo Horn
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: William Henney @ 2007-11-14 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tassilo Horn; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
Hi Tassilo
On 11/14/07, Tassilo Horn <tassilo@member.fsf.org> wrote:
> Wes Nakamura <wknaka@pobox.com> writes:
>
> Hi Wes,
>
> > On XEmacs I like being able to have a default variable width font in
> > the org-mode buffer but still have the calendar, etc, come up in a
> > monospace font in a different buffer in the same frame. I haven't
> > been able to do this in Emacs since I believe fonts are not buffer
> > local but applied to a frame.
>
> That's wrong. You can mix as many proportional and variable width faces
> in one buffer as you whish. For example you could use big variable
> width fonts for org headlines and small proportional fonts for the
> normal content.
>
> Simply set point on the face you want to change and hit `M-x
> customize-face RET'.
>
No. I think you are missing Wes' point. Of course you can set
different fonts for different faces, but that does not help with the
particular issue that Wes mentions. The calendar uses the default
face, as does org-mode for "normal" text. Therefore, you can't change
one without screwing up the other. If XEmacs allows the font
associated with a particular face to be buffer-local, then that is a
big improvement.
A work-around for GNU Emacs would be for org to use define an
"org-default" face that inherits from "default" but can be changed
independently. Is this feasible, Carsten? I would appreciate that
feature too.
The main reason I don't use XEmacs any more is that there is no
version for OS X that is as nice as Aquamacs...
Cheers
Will (XEmacs user 1993-2005, GNU Emacs user 1990-1993, 2005-present)
--
Dr William Henney, Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Morelia
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: undo in org.el
2007-11-14 15:02 ` William Henney
@ 2007-11-14 19:46 ` Tassilo Horn
2007-11-14 22:37 ` William Henney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 18+ messages in thread
From: Tassilo Horn @ 2007-11-14 19:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
"William Henney" <whenney@gmail.com> writes:
Hi William,
>> > On XEmacs I like being able to have a default variable width font
>> > in the org-mode buffer but still have the calendar, etc, come up in
>> > a monospace font in a different buffer in the same frame. I
>> > haven't been able to do this in Emacs since I believe fonts are not
>> > buffer local but applied to a frame.
>>
>> That's wrong. You can mix as many proportional and variable width
>> faces in one buffer as you whish. For example you could use big
>> variable width fonts for org headlines and small proportional fonts
>> for the normal content.
>>
>> Simply set point on the face you want to change and hit `M-x
>> customize-face RET'.
>
> No. I think you are missing Wes' point. Of course you can set
> different fonts for different faces, but that does not help with the
> particular issue that Wes mentions. The calendar uses the default
> face, as does org-mode for "normal" text. Therefore, you can't change
> one without screwing up the other. If XEmacs allows the font
> associated with a particular face to be buffer-local, then that is a
> big improvement.
And how does XEmacs know what face a new buffer should use? By its
major mode?
Bye,
Tassilo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: undo in org.el
2007-11-14 19:46 ` Tassilo Horn
@ 2007-11-14 22:37 ` William Henney
0 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: William Henney @ 2007-11-14 22:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tassilo Horn; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
On 11/14/07, Tassilo Horn <tassilo@member.fsf.org> wrote:
> "William Henney" <whenney@gmail.com> writes:
> > If XEmacs allows the font
> > associated with a particular face to be buffer-local, then that is a
> > big improvement.
>
> And how does XEmacs know what face a new buffer should use? By its
> major mode?
>
I really have no idea, but I'm guessing it works the same as any other
buffer-local variable. That is, there is a global default value that
is used for any buffer that has not explicitly set the variable
locally.
Cheers
Will
--
Dr William Henney, Centro de Radioastronomía y Astrofísica,
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Campus Morelia
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: undo in org.el
2007-11-13 22:50 ` Wes Nakamura
[not found] ` <E6B22961-FEA9-4D09-9743-64202CB7DB8D@science.uva.nl>
2007-11-14 8:13 ` Tassilo Horn
@ 2007-11-14 9:02 ` Carsten Dominik
2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-11-14 9:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wes Nakamura; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
On 13Nov2007, at 11:50 PM, Wes Nakamura wrote:
>
>
> | On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> wrote:
> | > Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
> | > multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
> | > easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
> | >
> | > Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if
> it is
> | > still worth supporting it....
> | >
> | >
> | > - Carsten
> | >
>
> Another XEmacs user here. On XEmacs I like being able to have a
> default variable width font in the org-mode buffer but still have the
> calendar, etc, come up in a monospace font in a different buffer in
> the
> same frame. I haven't been able to do this in Emacs since I believe
> fonts are not buffer local but applied to a frame.
I am not sure about this, but yes, XEmacs has many great features,
like specifyiers. I did use it for many years as my main Emacs.
- Carsten
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
* Re: undo in org.el
2007-11-13 9:03 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-13 11:44 ` Tim O'Callaghan
@ 2007-11-13 12:15 ` Dr. Volker Zell
2007-11-13 12:19 ` Stefan Kamphausen
2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Dr. Volker Zell @ 2007-11-13 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: emacs-orgmode
>>>>> Carsten Dominik writes:
> Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented
> multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much
> easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs.
> Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if it is
> still worth supporting it....
It is ...
> - Carsten
Ciao
Volker
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread* Re: undo in org.el
2007-11-13 9:03 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-13 11:44 ` Tim O'Callaghan
2007-11-13 12:15 ` Dr. Volker Zell
@ 2007-11-13 12:19 ` Stefan Kamphausen
2 siblings, 0 replies; 18+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Kamphausen @ 2007-11-13 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Carsten Dominik; +Cc: emacs-orgmode, Leo
Hi,
Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes:
> Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if it is
> still worth supporting it....
I definitely think it is. (Although I'm currently giving Gnu Emacs
another try after years of XEmacs-induced productivity ;-)
Regards,
Stefan
--
Stefan Kamphausen --- http://www.skamphausen.de
a blessed +42 regexp of confusion (weapon in hand)
You hit. The format string crumbles and turns to dust.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 18+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-11-15 11:55 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-11-12 21:23 undo in org.el Leo
2007-11-13 9:03 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-13 11:44 ` Tim O'Callaghan
2007-11-13 15:28 ` Ed Hirgelt
2007-11-13 15:37 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-13 20:58 ` Leo
2007-11-13 22:12 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-15 11:45 ` Dr. Volker Zell
2007-11-15 11:55 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-13 22:50 ` Wes Nakamura
[not found] ` <E6B22961-FEA9-4D09-9743-64202CB7DB8D@science.uva.nl>
2007-11-14 8:08 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-14 8:13 ` Tassilo Horn
2007-11-14 15:02 ` William Henney
2007-11-14 19:46 ` Tassilo Horn
2007-11-14 22:37 ` William Henney
2007-11-14 9:02 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-11-13 12:15 ` Dr. Volker Zell
2007-11-13 12:19 ` Stefan Kamphausen
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).