From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Dominik Subject: Re: undo in org.el Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:37:21 +0100 Message-ID: <5D5703BA-DAFE-4D93-9AF6-29DC25499474@science.uva.nl> References: <5C8B63FD-C596-4FBA-A8E5-DA0262F222BA@science.uva.nl> <3d6808890711130344j3a10bf5cuf6e68de26006bb48@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IrxpR-0003ss-4o for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:37:29 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IrxpP-0003ou-7l for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:37:28 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IrxpO-0003oO-Up for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:37:27 -0500 Received: from smtp.science.uva.nl ([146.50.4.84]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IrxpO-0002Fg-Bi for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:37:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3d6808890711130344j3a10bf5cuf6e68de26006bb48@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Tim O'Callaghan Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org On 13Nov2007, at 12:44 PM, Tim O'Callaghan wrote: > On 13/11/2007, Carsten Dominik wrote: >> Dammit, if I only had know about this earlier! I implemented >> multibuffer undo for the agenda, sort-of by hand. This looks much >> easier, but on this other hand it will not work on XEmacs. >> >> Sometimes I wander how many XEmacs users are out there, and if it is >> still worth supporting it.... >> >> >> - Carsten >> > > If that was a call to Xemacs users to identify themselves, then here > is one. Even though it is in the Emacs CVS tree now should not turn it > into an Emacs only tool IMHO. Well, the fact that it is in Emacs CVS has not kept me from supporting XEmacs for quite a while now. But it is extra work and requires catering for missing features and different implementations - so it is important for me to know that this is used and still appreciated. How about someone stepping forward and trying to release an XEmacs package containing noutline.el and org-mode? Anyone who feels up to this? Because I will not have the time. - Carsten