emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed

From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Release: Org-mode 5.09
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 02:49:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y7f3v5qh.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <572452f66890dd8ebca04908cbd33e29@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Tue, 18 Sep 2007 12:59:40 +0200")

Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com> writes:

>> Priority cycling is a bit odd. When I use M-n to cycle, it turns
>> from #C-> nil-> #C-> nil, and M-p will be #A->nil->#A->nil.
>
> I did it like this on purpose, because I wanted S-up to
> immediately increase the priority.  

I would vote for something very simple: 

<S-up> increases priority, <S-down> decreases priority.

<S-up>   : nil -> [#A] -> [#B] -> [#C] -> nil
           [#A] -> [#B] -> [#C] -> nil -> [#A]
           [#B] -> [#C] -> nil -> [#A] -> [#B]
           [...]

<S-down> : nil -> [#C] -> [#B] -> [#A] -> nil
           [#A] -> nil -> [#C] -> [#B] -> [#A]
           [#B] -> [#A] -> nil -> [#C] -> [#B]
           [...]

I know it wouldn't be aware of the default priority, but I would still
prefer this behavior over another one.

For making the priority setting aware of the default priority I would
better use this:

<S-up>   : increase priority (by with normal cycling)
<S-down> : switch default priority / nil

But I still prefer the very simple interface... as I tend to think
priority handling should be as smooth (and sober) as possible.

-- 
Bastien

next prev parent reply	other threads:[~2007-09-19  0:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-15 10:35 Release: Org-mode 5.09 Carsten Dominik
2007-09-15 21:25 ` Rainer Stengele
2007-09-17 12:24   ` Carsten Dominik
2007-09-18  1:00 ` Xavier Maillard
2007-09-18  9:00 ` Levin
2007-09-18 10:59   ` Carsten Dominik
2007-09-19  0:49     ` Bastien [this message]
2007-09-20  8:45       ` Carsten Dominik
2007-09-20  8:45       ` Carsten Dominik
2007-09-20 13:34         ` Bastien
2007-09-20 14:08           ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2007-09-20 14:23             ` Bernt Hansen
2007-09-20 20:07               ` John Wiegley
2007-09-20 14:36             ` Bastien
2007-09-24  9:33           ` Rick Moynihan
2007-09-18  9:27 ` Levin
2007-09-18 11:01   ` Carsten Dominik
2007-09-18  9:38 ` Levin
2007-09-18 11:11   ` Carsten Dominik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y7f3v5qh.fsf@bzg.ath.cx \
    --to=bzg@altern.org \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).