emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Re: Release: Org-mode 5.09
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 16:36:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y7f19zeg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zlzhsa4d.fsf@aka.i.naked.iki.fi> (Nuutti Kotivuori's message of "Thu, 20 Sep 2007 17:08:02 +0300")

Nuutti Kotivuori <naked@iki.fi> writes:

> Bastien wrote:
>> The only thing that still tickles me here is that the *default* priority
>> is not the *easiest* to assign.  So why not this:
>
> I've never understood what's the difference between a line with the
> default priority and a line without a priority at all. 

Depends on what "default" stands for.   It can be either:

1. the first available state when setting priorities
2. the default state you *want* to use when you need to set a priority;
3. the state that neither increase or decrease the priority rating

>  That is, with
> the default settings:
>
> * [#B] Foo
> * Bar
>
> Are these not equivalent in priority sorting? 

For sorting with org-sort, yes. But I use this convention that any item
that has a priority - even the default priority - should be done before
other items.  For example:

* [#A] Foo
* [#B] Bar
* [#C] Fooo
* Baar

In this case, * Baar and * [#B] are not equivalent.

> If so, why should the default priority be ever explicitly said?

To quickly be able to choose this default priority when cycling? :)

-- 
Bastien

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-09-20 14:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-15 10:35 Release: Org-mode 5.09 Carsten Dominik
2007-09-15 21:25 ` Rainer Stengele
2007-09-17 12:24   ` Carsten Dominik
2007-09-18  1:00 ` Xavier Maillard
2007-09-18  9:00 ` Levin
2007-09-18 10:59   ` Carsten Dominik
2007-09-19  0:49     ` Bastien
2007-09-20  8:45       ` Carsten Dominik
2007-09-20  8:45       ` Carsten Dominik
2007-09-20 13:34         ` Bastien
2007-09-20 14:08           ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2007-09-20 14:23             ` Bernt Hansen
2007-09-20 20:07               ` John Wiegley
2007-09-20 14:36             ` Bastien [this message]
2007-09-24  9:33           ` Rick Moynihan
2007-09-18  9:27 ` Levin
2007-09-18 11:01   ` Carsten Dominik
2007-09-18  9:38 ` Levin
2007-09-18 11:11   ` Carsten Dominik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y7f19zeg.fsf@bzg.ath.cx \
    --to=bzg@altern.org \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).