emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org>
To: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Cc: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>,
	Michael Brand <michael.ch.brand@gmail.com>,
	Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Context of interaction vs. literal syntactic interpretation
Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2014 10:09:50 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wqgbtiff.fsf@fastmail.fm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87siqzhapq.fsf@bzg.ath.cx

Bastien <bzg@altern.org> writes:
>
> For most commands, the first literal syntactic interpretation is the
> only relevant context of interaction: e.g., it would not make sense to
> try updating a tag outside of a headline (i.e. outside of where a tag
> is a tag, from the parser's view.)
>
> For some commands, another higher context can also be relevant: e.g.,
> when the point is on a heading and the user hit C-c C-o, Org needs to
> know whether we are on a link (in this case it will open the link).  If
> not, it checks for a higher context: when we are on a heading, it will
> look for multiple links and prompt the user for which one to open.
>
> (A generalization of this "links-in-a-heading" behavior for something
> like "links-in-a-paragraph", as suggested by Gustav, is a good idea.)

Is the question here perhaps a simple one of refactoring?

Nicolas is doing amazing work at making org file parsing more
systematic, precise, and predictable. (Thank you!) And I agree with him
that a function named org-open-link-at-point should, for the sake of
precision and consistency, only open a link at the point.

I also agree that such a function should do nothing in the context of a
comment, which should simply be a string. FWIW, it seems to me that
there are still several places in the source code that could be cleaned
up in this way. For instance, org-mode code examples designated for
export have unwanted effects in the agenda. Try putting this in an
agenda file...

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
* An example
: * Watch me
:  <2014-03-03 Mon 9:00>
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

The problem, it seems to me, is that org-open-at-point is ambiguously
named. The last bit, "at-point", suggests a precise scope, but the
beginning "org-open" implies a broad, fuzzy scope (i.e., it is not clear
what is being opened). The problem is that org-open-at-point doubles as
a meta function and a more precise function to open links at the point
--- i.e., it implements within itself all the internals this more
precise task.

Org, of course, has a lot of helpful "dwim" functions (e.g.,
org-meta-return, org-cycle, etc.). I would not want to lose these. As
Bastien suggested, these functions are precisely what make org-mode so
easy and intuitive to use. However, org has historically implemented
many of its internals in an ad-hoc fashion within very large functions.
This has led to some redundancy and opacity. This is especially true for
a function like org-open-at-point, which is both precise and broad. This
is where org-mode stands a lot to gain from refactoring the code base
around Nicolas's parser.

My view is that precision and usability need not be mutually exclusive.
Might we have a bunch of precise, modular functions that rely on the new
parser? E.g., something like org-open-link-at-point. This would do
exactly what it says -- i.e., open a link if one is at the point. Then,
on top of these function s we could rebuild fuzzier "meta" and "dwim"
functions (e.g., org-open-links-in-paragraph, org-open-links-in-entry,
org-meta-open, org-open-at-point,... whatever).

In short, I am excited by the potential that the parser provides to make
the code base more transparent, granular, and precise.

Matt

  reply	other threads:[~2014-03-03 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-03 12:11 link interfering with brackets when abbreviated Michael Brand
2014-02-26 15:10 ` Michael Brand
2014-02-26 15:25   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-02-26 15:44     ` Michael Brand
2014-02-26 15:54       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-02-26 16:22         ` Michael Brand
2014-02-26 16:41           ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-02-26 17:03             ` Michael Brand
2014-02-26 17:20               ` Bastien
2014-02-26 19:02                 ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-02-26 22:54                   ` Bastien
2014-02-27 10:28                     ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-02-27 11:04                       ` Bastien
2014-02-27 20:01                       ` Michael Brand
2014-02-27 22:08                         ` Bastien
2014-02-27 23:43                           ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-03-01 18:44                             ` Yasushi SHOJI
2014-03-01 20:20                               ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-03-01 20:54                                 ` Bastien
2014-03-01 20:57                                   ` Bastien
2014-03-01 21:35                                   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-03-01 21:50                                     ` Bastien
2014-03-01 22:14                                       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-03-02 13:35                                         ` Bastien
2014-03-03 14:12                                           ` Matt Lundin
2014-03-02  0:22                                 ` Yasushi SHOJI
2014-03-02  9:05                                   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-03-02 13:22                                     ` Bastien
2014-03-02 14:27                                       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-03-02 15:49                                         ` Bastien
2014-03-02 16:32                                           ` Thorsten Jolitz
2014-03-03  3:41                                           ` Josiah Schwab
2014-03-03  5:54                                           ` Michael Brand
2014-03-03  9:50                                             ` Context of interaction vs. literal syntactic interpretation (was: link interfering with brackets when abbreviated) Bastien
2014-03-03 16:09                                               ` Matt Lundin [this message]
2014-03-03 18:00                                                 ` Context of interaction vs. literal syntactic interpretation Nick Dokos
2014-03-03 18:13                                                 ` Jonathan Leech-Pepin
2014-03-14 13:46                                                 ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-03-21  8:44                                                 ` Bastien
2014-03-21 13:17                                                   ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-03-23 22:51                                                     ` Bastien
2014-03-24 13:12                                                       ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-03-01 18:44                             ` link interfering with brackets when abbreviated Yasushi SHOJI
2014-02-26 17:42   ` Bastien
2014-02-26 21:15     ` Nicolas Goaziou
2014-02-26 22:21       ` Bastien

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.orgmode.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wqgbtiff.fsf@fastmail.fm \
    --to=mdl@imapmail.org \
    --cc=bzg@altern.org \
    --cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
    --cc=michael.ch.brand@gmail.com \
    --cc=n.goaziou@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).