* blorg?? @ 2009-03-21 10:44 Rustom Mody 2009-03-22 13:44 ` blorg?? Matthew Lundin 2009-03-22 14:21 ` blorg?? David Bremner 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Rustom Mody @ 2009-03-21 10:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-orgmode [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 318 bytes --] I have a team of some 4-5 programmers. They've started sending me their reports in org format. I was considering the next step of making them blog rather than use mail for their reports and was wondering if blorg.el is the way to go. (Gather that blorg is not really stable) Any other suggestions (org-oddmuse.el??) [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 346 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 204 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: blorg?? 2009-03-21 10:44 blorg?? Rustom Mody @ 2009-03-22 13:44 ` Matthew Lundin 2009-03-22 14:10 ` blorg?? Alex Ott 2009-03-22 18:00 ` [ANN] blorgit: org-mode blogging engine Eric Schulte 2009-03-22 14:21 ` blorg?? David Bremner 1 sibling, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Matthew Lundin @ 2009-03-22 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rustom Mody; +Cc: emacs-orgmode Hi Rustom, Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> writes: > I have a team of some 4-5 programmers. > > They've started sending me their reports in org format. > I was considering the next step of making them blog rather than use > mail for their reports and was wondering if blorg.el is the way to go. > (Gather that blorg is not really stable) Any current blorg users care to comment? > Any other suggestions (org-oddmuse.el??) I just discovered that there is ruby blog engine in development that uses org files as a back end: - http://github.com/eschulte/blorgit/tree/master (Looks really promising, Eric!) Best, Matt ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: blorg?? 2009-03-22 13:44 ` blorg?? Matthew Lundin @ 2009-03-22 14:10 ` Alex Ott 2009-03-22 18:00 ` [ANN] blorgit: org-mode blogging engine Eric Schulte 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Alex Ott @ 2009-03-22 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-orgmode Hello all >>>>> "ML" == Matthew Lundin writes: ML> Hi Rustom, Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> writes: >> I have a team of some 4-5 programmers. >> >> They've started sending me their reports in org format. I was >> considering the next step of making them blog rather than use mail for >> their reports and was wondering if blorg.el is the way to go. (Gather >> that blorg is not really stable) ML> Any current blorg users care to comment? I slightly hacked blorg to allow to use relative links, proper symbols escaping in links, etc. (and i dropped copying of data into directories inside publish). My version is available from http://xtalk.msk.su/~ott/common/emacs/blorg.el -- With best wishes, Alex Ott, MBA http://alexott.blogspot.com/ http://xtalk.msk.su/~ott/ http://alexott-ru.blogspot.com/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [ANN] blorgit: org-mode blogging engine 2009-03-22 13:44 ` blorg?? Matthew Lundin 2009-03-22 14:10 ` blorg?? Alex Ott @ 2009-03-22 18:00 ` Eric Schulte 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: Eric Schulte @ 2009-03-22 18:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matthew Lundin; +Cc: Rustom Mody, emacs-orgmode Matthew Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org> writes: > > I just discovered that there is ruby blog engine in development that > uses org files as a back end: > > - http://github.com/eschulte/blorgit/tree/master > > (Looks really promising, Eric!) > Thanks Matt, I've been using this myself for a couple of weeks now for sharing my notes at work, and to convince my girlfriend (a sworn enemy of Emacs) to help maintain a large org-mode formatted recipe catalog, by editing pages through the blorgit web interface. I think this should now be ready for public consumption. Blorgit is a simple blogging engine. Features include... - comments :: Comments can be left through the web interface, and they will be appended to the org-mode file under a "Comments" header. They can be turned on or off globally, or through the properties of the "Comments" header - editing :: optional editing through the web interface can be turned on or off, and can be password protected - themes :: there are a couple of default themes distributed with blorgit (try the 'org' theme using Tim Burt's folded unicorn) - runs directly from .org files :: this is designed to run off of a directory of org-mode formatted files, all exportation is handled by blorgit, so you should be able to point this to an existing directory of org-mode files, fire up the browser and get going. This also means that it is easy to add content or make configuration changes through git or any VC system. - exportation :: all pages can be downloaded in org-mode or LaTeX formats The goal was to be relatively simple/hackable. The look and feel should be largely malleable through css, and if you want to dig deeper, all of the views and logic are located inside the blorgit.rb file. See http://github.com/eschulte/blorgit/tree/master for instillation and configuration instructions. If anyone has any feedback, or wants to add new default themes I'm all ears. Thanks -- Eric Also, for a slightly more ambitious (if less mature) effort see orGit. It an org-mode formatted wiki, backed by a git repository (edits are automatically committed to git, some git actions (reversion of pages, etc...) can be handled through the web interface, and the git history can be browsed through the wiki) see http://github.com/eschulte/orGit/tree/master ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: blorg?? 2009-03-21 10:44 blorg?? Rustom Mody 2009-03-22 13:44 ` blorg?? Matthew Lundin @ 2009-03-22 14:21 ` David Bremner 1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: David Bremner @ 2009-03-22 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Rustom Mody; +Cc: emacs-orgmode Rustom Mody wrote: >They've started sending me their reports in org format. I was >considering the next step of making them blog rather than use mail >for their reports and was wondering if blorg.el is the way to >go. (Gather that blorg is not really stable) Any other suggestions >(org-oddmuse.el??) As I think mentioned once before on the list, you can use the Org backend by Manoj Srivastava with ikiwiki. Ikiwiki can use git as a backend, so that might give you a nice way for people to file reports. It works fine for me (I mostly use it to insert tables into markdown documents). d ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-03-22 17:58 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2009-03-21 10:44 blorg?? Rustom Mody 2009-03-22 13:44 ` blorg?? Matthew Lundin 2009-03-22 14:10 ` blorg?? Alex Ott 2009-03-22 18:00 ` [ANN] blorgit: org-mode blogging engine Eric Schulte 2009-03-22 14:21 ` blorg?? David Bremner
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).