* A puzzle to solve: saved categories vs. tags @ 2007-10-07 9:14 John Wiegley 2007-10-07 12:27 ` Bastien 2007-10-08 7:48 ` Carsten Dominik 0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: John Wiegley @ 2007-10-07 9:14 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-orgmode Ok, I have 147k of archived todos and notes now. Some are tagged, some are not. Most have an ARCHIVE_CATEGORY property (ever since Carsten so kindly implemented it). My desire: To hit C-u C-c \ and have it prompt me for the "entity" its going to search for. The possible entities are TAGS, or a property name. Then it asks for the text string, as usual. The result should make it possible for me to see all entries that came from a specific category or group of categories. john ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: A puzzle to solve: saved categories vs. tags 2007-10-07 9:14 A puzzle to solve: saved categories vs. tags John Wiegley @ 2007-10-07 12:27 ` Bastien 2007-10-07 20:27 ` John Wiegley ` (2 more replies) 2007-10-08 7:48 ` Carsten Dominik 1 sibling, 3 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Bastien @ 2007-10-07 12:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-orgmode John Wiegley <johnw@newartisans.com> writes: > My desire: To hit C-u C-c \ and have it prompt me for the "entity" its > going to search for. The possible entities are TAGS, or a property > name. Then it asks for the text string, as usual. The result should > make it possible for me to see all entries that came from a specific > category or group of categories. For now C-u C-c \ does something different: ,----[ (info "(Org)Tag searches") ] | `C-c \' | Create a sparse tree with all headlines matching a tags search. | With a `C-u' prefix argument, ignore headlines that are not a TODO | line. `---- I'm not using C-u C-c \ that much, mostly because I use agenda views a lot. But your request to make the C-c \ query interactive -- whatever key it is bound to -- sounds nice. As you probable know, you can already perform complex searches like: C-c \ +Urgent-@Work+CATEGORY="code"/NEXT This will search for headlines with the tag "Urgent", without the tag "@Work", with category "code" and which TODO keyword is "NEXT". Yes, that's quite complex and I guess we sometime prefer not to care about the syntax of the query, but rather be prompted for it. If Carsten implements this, I think all the search facilities in Org will need a bit of uniformization/clarification. For now we have: | key | function | knows about | C-u | |---------+----------------------+----------------+------------------| | C-c / | org-occur | regexp | | | C-c \ | org-tags-sparse-tree | tags, and more | restrict to TODO | | C-c C-v | org-show-todo-tree | todo keywords | ask for keyword | A few ideas about this: 1. I tend to use C-c \ a lot than C-c / -- but I find the C-c / key much more convenient. I guess it's far too late to switch, but still. 2. AFAIK org-tags-sparse-tree is more powerful than org-show-todo-tree. If we add the possibility to build interactive queries, it will definitely become *the* universal search interface for Org. 3. Being able to restrict to TODO entries when searching for tags is nice, we should keep it somehow. Maybe org-show-todo-tree could do something similar by restricting the search to tags? If I sum up, here are the search capacities that we could end up with: 1. Search for a regexp 2. Search for a complex query 3. Prompt interactively for a complex query 4. Show all tagged entries 5. Prompt for a specific tag 6. Prompt for a specific tag (restricting to TODO entries) 7. Show all TODO entries 8. Prompt for a specific TODO 9. Prompt for a specific TODO (restricting to tagged entries) All this might need to be put in the search functions somehow: {0,1,2,3} would be the "universal" search functions {4,5,6} would be the tag search {7,8,9} would be the TODO search Well, sorry for such a long input, I hope it's still useful. -- Bastien ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: A puzzle to solve: saved categories vs. tags 2007-10-07 12:27 ` Bastien @ 2007-10-07 20:27 ` John Wiegley 2007-10-08 9:43 ` Bastien 2007-10-08 7:06 ` Carsten Dominik 2007-10-08 18:09 ` Carsten Dominik 2 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: John Wiegley @ 2007-10-07 20:27 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-orgmode Bastien <bzg@altern.org> writes: > 1. Search for a regexp > 2. Search for a complex query > 3. Prompt interactively for a complex query > 4. Show all tagged entries > 5. Prompt for a specific tag > 6. Prompt for a specific tag (restricting to TODO entries) > 7. Show all TODO entries > 8. Prompt for a specific TODO > 9. Prompt for a specific TODO (restricting to tagged entries) I didn't see "Prompt for a specific property and value" in your list. Is this already possible using a complex query? John ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: A puzzle to solve: saved categories vs. tags 2007-10-07 20:27 ` John Wiegley @ 2007-10-08 9:43 ` Bastien 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Bastien @ 2007-10-08 9:43 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-orgmode John Wiegley <johnw@newartisans.com> writes: > Bastien <bzg@altern.org> writes: > >> 1. Search for a regexp >> 2. Search for a complex query >> 3. Prompt interactively for a complex query >> 4. Show all tagged entries >> 5. Prompt for a specific tag >> 6. Prompt for a specific tag (restricting to TODO entries) >> 7. Show all TODO entries >> 8. Prompt for a specific TODO >> 9. Prompt for a specific TODO (restricting to tagged entries) > > I didn't see "Prompt for a specific property and value" in your list. This would be the interactive (maybe prefix) version of "search for a complex query". > Is this already possible using a complex query? Re-quoting myself: ,---- | As you probable know, you can already perform complex searches like: | | C-c \ +Urgent-@Work+CATEGORY="code"/NEXT | | This will search for headlines with the tag "Urgent", without the tag | "@Work", with category "code" and which TODO keyword is "NEXT". Yes, | that's quite complex and I guess we sometime prefer not to care about | the syntax of the query, but rather be prompted for it. `---- Then to search for a specific pair of property-value: C-c \ PROPERTY="value" As for now "value" should be the exact string, not a regexp. -- Bastien ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: A puzzle to solve: saved categories vs. tags 2007-10-07 12:27 ` Bastien 2007-10-07 20:27 ` John Wiegley @ 2007-10-08 7:06 ` Carsten Dominik 2007-10-08 18:09 ` Carsten Dominik 2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-10-08 7:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bastien; +Cc: emacs-orgmode On Oct 7, 2007, at 14:27, Bastien wrote: > If Carsten implements this, I think all the search facilities in Org > will need a bit of uniformization/clarification. Admittedly the search functions are one of the areas that demonstrate most clearly how Org-mode has grown and evolved, adding little things. Could use a complete re-write, but there is no time for this. > For now we have: > > | key | function | knows about | C-u | > |---------+----------------------+----------------+------------------| > | C-c / | org-occur | regexp | | > | C-c \ | org-tags-sparse-tree | tags, and more | restrict to TODO | > | C-c C-v | org-show-todo-tree | todo keywords | ask for keyword | > > A few ideas about this: > > 1. I tend to use C-c \ a lot than C-c / -- but I find the C-c / key > much > more convenient. I guess it's far too late to switch, but still. I guess you use a French keyboard? On mine both are equally easily accessed. > 2. AFAIK org-tags-sparse-tree is more powerful than org-show-todo-tree. > If we add the possibility to build interactive queries, it will > definitely become *the* universal search interface for Org. That is true, but newbies will start with simple things, and it is good to have simple commands to start off. Thanks for the list of search options, a good start. - Carsten ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: A puzzle to solve: saved categories vs. tags 2007-10-07 12:27 ` Bastien 2007-10-07 20:27 ` John Wiegley 2007-10-08 7:06 ` Carsten Dominik @ 2007-10-08 18:09 ` Carsten Dominik 2 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-10-08 18:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bastien; +Cc: emacs-orgmode On Oct 7, 2007, at 14:27, Bastien wrote: > If Carsten implements this, I think all the search facilities in Org > will need a bit of uniformization/clarification. Admittedly the search functions are one of the areas that demonstrate most clearly how Org-mode has grown and evolved, adding little things. > For now we have: > > | key | function | knows about | C-u | > |---------+----------------------+----------------+------------------| > | C-c / | org-occur | regexp | | > | C-c \ | org-tags-sparse-tree | tags, and more | restrict to TODO | > | C-c C-v | org-show-todo-tree | todo keywords | ask for keyword | > > A few ideas about this: > > 1. I tend to use C-c \ a lot than C-c / -- but I find the C-c / key > much > more convenient. I guess it's far too late to switch, but still. I guess you use a French keyboard? On mine both are equally easily accessed. > 2. AFAIK org-tags-sparse-tree is more powerful than org-show-todo-tree. > If we add the possibility to build interactive queries, it will > definitely become *the* universal search interface for Org. That is true, but newbies will start with simple things, and it is good to have simple commands to start off. Thanks for the list of search options, a good start. - Carsten -- Carsten Dominik Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek" Universiteit van Amsterdam Kruislaan 403 NL-1098SJ Amsterdam phone: +31 20 525 7477 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: A puzzle to solve: saved categories vs. tags 2007-10-07 9:14 A puzzle to solve: saved categories vs. tags John Wiegley 2007-10-07 12:27 ` Bastien @ 2007-10-08 7:48 ` Carsten Dominik 2007-10-08 10:54 ` Bastien 1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-10-08 7:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: John Wiegley; +Cc: emacs-orgmode [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1029 bytes --] On Oct 7, 2007, at 11:14, John Wiegley wrote: > Ok, I have 147k of archived todos and notes now. Some are tagged, > some are > not. Most have an ARCHIVE_CATEGORY property (ever since Carsten so > kindly > implemented it). > > My desire: To hit C-u C-c \ and have it prompt me for the "entity" its > going > to search for. The possible entities are TAGS, or a property name. > Then it > asks for the text string, as usual. The result should make it > possible for me > to see all entries that came from a specific category or group of > categories. If I understand correctly, this will be just for typing convenience? So that you do not have to fully type the property name? Because you can of course do this search as Bastien described. Also, should this result in a sparse tree, or in an agenda buffer? I guess you mean a sparse tree since you refer to `C-c \'. Here is a first attempt at such a function, comments are welcome! Maybe we should bind this function to `C-c /', instead of org-occur? - Carsten [-- Attachment #2: org-sparse-tree-interactive.el --] [-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1608 bytes --] (defun org-sparse-tree (&optional arg) "Create a sparse tree, prompt for the details. This command can create sparse trees. You first need to select the type of match used to create the tree: t Show entries with a specific TODO keyword. T Show entries selected by a tags match. p Enter a property name and its value (both with completion on existing names/values) and show entries with that property. r Show entries matching a regular expression" (interactive "P") (let (ans kwd value) (message "Sparse tree: [r]egexp [t]odo-kwd [T]ag [p]roperty") (setq ans (read-char-exclusive)) (cond ((equal ans ?t) (org-show-todo-tree '(4))) ((equal ans ?T) (call-interactively 'org-tags-sparse-tree)) ((member ans '(?p ?P)) (setq kwd (completing-read "Property: " (mapcar 'list (org-buffer-property-keys t t)))) (setq value (completing-read "Value: " (mapcar 'list (org-property-values kwd)))) (or (string-match "\\`{.*}\\'") (setq value (concat "\"" value "\""))) (org-tags-sparse-tree arg (concat kwd "=" value))) ((member ans '(?r ?R)) (call-interactively 'org-occur)) (t (error "No such sparse tree command \"%c\"" ans))))) (defun org-property-values (key) "Return a list of all values of property KEY." (save-excursion (save-restriction (widen) (goto-char (point-min)) (let ((re (concat "^[ \t]*:" key ":[ \t]*\\(\\S-.*\\)")) values) (while (re-search-forward re nil t) (add-to-list 'values (org-trim (match-string 1)))) (delete "" values))))) [-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 146 bytes --] -- Carsten Dominik Sterrenkundig Instituut "Anton Pannekoek" Universiteit van Amsterdam Kruislaan 403 NL-1098SJ Amsterdam phone: +31 20 525 7477 [-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 204 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: A puzzle to solve: saved categories vs. tags 2007-10-08 7:48 ` Carsten Dominik @ 2007-10-08 10:54 ` Bastien 2007-10-08 10:50 ` Carsten Dominik 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Bastien @ 2007-10-08 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-orgmode Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes: > Here is a first attempt at such a function, comments are welcome! > Maybe we should bind this function to `C-c /', instead of org-occur? Yes, this binding would be okay, unless there are lots of people using org-occur out there. And `org-sparse-tree' should match both John request and what I called (in such a bombastic manner) a "universal" search interface. There is a problem with (org-buffer-property-keys t t). Here is the backtrace: ,---- | Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument symbolp ("TODO" "TAGS" "ALLTAGS" "DEADLINE" "SCHEDULED" "CLOCK" "PRIORITY" "Release" "Incompatible_ALL" "Elapsed_time" "Location" "LOCATION_ALL" "People_ALL" "COLUMNS" "LOCATION" "CATEGORY" "ARCHIVE")) | add-to-list(("TODO" "TAGS" "ALLTAGS" "DEADLINE" "SCHEDULED" "CLOCK" "PRIORITY" "Release" "Incompatible_ALL" "Elapsed_time" "Location" "LOCATION_ALL" "People_ALL" "COLUMNS" "LOCATION" "CATEGORY" "ARCHIVE") "CATEGORY") | org-buffer-property-keys(t t) | eval((org-buffer-property-keys t t)) | eval-expression((org-buffer-property-keys t t) nil) | call-interactively(eval-expression) `---- -- Bastien ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: A puzzle to solve: saved categories vs. tags 2007-10-08 10:54 ` Bastien @ 2007-10-08 10:50 ` Carsten Dominik [not found] ` <87tzp14w7h.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-10-08 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bastien; +Cc: emacs-orgmode On Oct 8, 2007, at 12:54, Bastien wrote: > Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes: > >> Here is a first attempt at such a function, comments are welcome! >> Maybe we should bind this function to `C-c /', instead of org-occur? > > Yes, this binding would be okay, unless there are lots of people using > org-occur out there. > > And `org-sparse-tree' should match both John request and what I called > (in such a bombastic manner) a "universal" search interface. > > There is a problem with (org-buffer-property-keys t t). Here is the > backtrace: Arrrgh! make that (org-buffer-property-keys t) for now, bug fix in next release. - Carsten ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <87tzp14w7h.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>]
* Re: A puzzle to solve: saved categories vs. tags [not found] ` <87tzp14w7h.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> @ 2007-10-08 11:48 ` Carsten Dominik 0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread From: Carsten Dominik @ 2007-10-08 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Bastien; +Cc: org-mode list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 397 bytes --] On Oct 8, 2007, at 14:39, Bastien wrote: > Carsten Dominik <dominik@science.uva.nl> writes: > >> Arrrgh! >> >> make that (org-buffer-property-keys t) for now, bug fix in next >> release. > > This patch is also needed: Indeed, thanks a lot. So to make this simpler, here is the modified version that should work out of the box. Sorry once again for the mess and the bandwidth waste. - Carsten [-- Attachment #2: org-sparse-tree-interactive.el --] [-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 1615 bytes --] (defun org-sparse-tree (&optional arg) "Create a sparse tree, prompt for the details. This command can create sparse trees. You first need to select the type of match used to create the tree: t Show entries with a specific TODO keyword. T Show entries selected by a tags match. p Enter a property name and its value (both with completion on existing names/values) and show entries with that property. r Show entries matching a regular expression" (interactive "P") (let (ans kwd value) (message "Sparse tree: [r]egexp [t]odo-kwd [T]ag [p]roperty") (setq ans (read-char-exclusive)) (cond ((equal ans ?t) (org-show-todo-tree '(4))) ((equal ans ?T) (call-interactively 'org-tags-sparse-tree)) ((member ans '(?p ?P)) (setq kwd (completing-read "Property: " (mapcar 'list (org-buffer-property-keys)))) (setq value (completing-read "Value: " (mapcar 'list (org-property-values kwd)))) (unless (string-match "\\`{.*}\\'" value) (setq value (concat "\"" value "\""))) (org-tags-sparse-tree arg (concat kwd "=" value))) ((member ans '(?r ?R)) (call-interactively 'org-occur)) (t (error "No such sparse tree command \"%c\"" ans))))) (defun org-property-values (key) "Return a list of all values of property KEY." (save-excursion (save-restriction (widen) (goto-char (point-min)) (let ((re (concat "^[ \t]*:" key ":[ \t]*\\(\\S-.*\\)")) values) (while (re-search-forward re nil t) (add-to-list 'values (org-trim (match-string 1)))) (delete "" values))))) [-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 204 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-08 18:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-07 9:14 A puzzle to solve: saved categories vs. tags John Wiegley
2007-10-07 12:27 ` Bastien
2007-10-07 20:27 ` John Wiegley
2007-10-08 9:43 ` Bastien
2007-10-08 7:06 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-10-08 18:09 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-10-08 7:48 ` Carsten Dominik
2007-10-08 10:54 ` Bastien
2007-10-08 10:50 ` Carsten Dominik
[not found] ` <87tzp14w7h.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
2007-10-08 11:48 ` Carsten Dominik
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).