emacs-orgmode@gnu.org archives
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed

* babel, header arguments.
@ 2014-11-18 18:44 jenia.ivlev
  2014-11-20  9:36 ` Sebastien Vauban
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: jenia.ivlev @ 2014-11-18 18:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: emacs-orgmode

Hello. I want to go through the book little schemer and take notes
interlaced with the code from the book. For this I want to use babel.

So lets say there's this function:

    #+name: my-plus
    #+begin_src scheme
        (define my-plus
          (lambda (x y) (+ x y)))
    #+end_src

And i want to call it from another source block, like so:

    #+tblname: addition
    | sum    |
    |--------|
    | #ERROR |
    #+TBLFM: @2$1='(org-sbe "my-plus" (33 22))

As you can see, I get an error. How do I write these "header-arguments"
(i think they are called) to achieve calling one src-block from another.

Also, second scenario, can I somehow call my-plus from a source-block as
so:

     #+begin_src scheme
         (my-plus 3 4)
     #+end_src


Thanks very much for your help and kind concern.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

• * Re: babel, header arguments.
    2014-11-18 18:44 babel, header arguments jenia.ivlev
  @ 2014-11-20  9:36 ` Sebastien Vauban
    2014-11-21 19:35   ` jenia.ivlev
    0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
  From: Sebastien Vauban @ 2014-11-20  9:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
    To: emacs-orgmode-mXXj517/zsQ
  
  jenia.ivlev wrote:
  > So lets say there's this function:
  >
  >     #+name: my-plus
  >     #+begin_src scheme
  >         (define my-plus
  >           (lambda (x y) (+ x y)))
  >     #+end_src
  >
  > And i want to call it from another source block, like so:
  >
  >     #+tblname: addition
  >     | sum    |
  >     |--------|
  >     | #ERROR |
  >     #+TBLFM: @2$1='(org-sbe "my-plus" (33 22))
  >
  > As you can see, I get an error. How do I write these "header-arguments"
  > (i think they are called) to achieve calling one src-block from another.
  
  This should do it (untested):
  
  (org-sbe "my-plus" (x 33) (y 22))
  
  > Also, second scenario, can I somehow call my-plus from a source-block as
  > so:
  >
  >      #+begin_src scheme
  >          (my-plus 3 4)
  >      #+end_src
  
  I think you must also call `org-sbe'.
  
  Best regards,
    Seb
  
  -- 
  Sebastien Vauban
  
  ^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

• • * Re: babel, header arguments.
      2014-11-20  9:36 ` Sebastien Vauban
    @ 2014-11-21 19:35   ` jenia.ivlev
      2014-11-21 19:49     ` Thomas S. Dye
      0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
    From: jenia.ivlev @ 2014-11-21 19:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
      To: emacs-orgmode
    
    Sebastien Vauban <sva-news@mygooglest.com>
    writes:
    
    > jenia.ivlev wrote:
    >> So lets say there's this function:
    >>
    >>     #+name: my-plus
    >>     #+begin_src scheme
    >>         (define my-plus
    >>           (lambda (x y) (+ x y)))
    >>     #+end_src
    >>
    >> And i want to call it from another source block, like so:
    >>
    >>     #+tblname: addition
    >>     | sum    |
    >>     |--------|
    >>     | #ERROR |
    >>     #+TBLFM: @2$1='(org-sbe "my-plus" (33 22))
    >>
    >> As you can see, I get an error. How do I write these "header-arguments"
    >> (i think they are called) to achieve calling one src-block from another.
    >
    > This should do it (untested):
    >
    > (org-sbe "my-plus" (x 33) (y 22))
    >
    >> Also, second scenario, can I somehow call my-plus from a source-block as
    >> so:
    >>
    >>      #+begin_src scheme
    >>          (my-plus 3 4)
    >>      #+end_src
    >
    > I think you must also call `org-sbe'.
    >
    > Best regards,
    >   Seb
    
    Thanks a lot Seb. It worked perfectly for the table.
    For the "second scenario" I don't understand how to import the results
    of my-plus function. The only thing I can think of is something like 
    this (it doesnt work by the way):
    
        #+begin_src scheme
            (+ z 1)
        #+end_src
        #+ z='(org-sbe "my-plus" (x 33) (y 22))
    
    Also, what if I want to import the actual function defintion into another src
    block:
    
        #+begin_src scheme
            (+ (my-plus 3 4) 1)
        #+end_src
        something here that import the previous function definitions
    
    Is that possible?
    
    
    
    
        
    
    ^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

  • • * Re: babel, header arguments.
        2014-11-21 19:35   ` jenia.ivlev
      @ 2014-11-21 19:49     ` Thomas S. Dye
        2014-11-21 20:09       ` jenia.ivlev
        0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
      From: Thomas S. Dye @ 2014-11-21 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
        To: jenia.ivlev; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
      
      Aloha,
      
      jenia.ivlev@gmail.com (jenia.ivlev) writes:
      
      > Also, what if I want to import the actual function defintion into another src
      > block:
      >
      >     #+begin_src scheme
      >         (+ (my-plus 3 4) 1)
      >     #+end_src
      >     something here that import the previous function definitions
      >
      > Is that possible?
      
      Yes, see section 14.10 Noweb reference syntax in the manual.
      
      You'll have something that looks like this:
      
      #+header: :noweb yes
      #+begin_src scheme
        <<previous-function-definition>>
        (+ (previous-function 3 4) 1)
      #+end_src
      
      hth,
      Tom
      
      -- 
      Thomas S. Dye
      http://www.tsdye.com
      
      ^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

    • • * Re: babel, header arguments.
          2014-11-21 19:49     ` Thomas S. Dye
        @ 2014-11-21 20:09       ` jenia.ivlev
          2014-11-21 20:32         ` jenia.ivlev
          2014-11-21 20:36         ` Thomas S. Dye
          0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
        From: jenia.ivlev @ 2014-11-21 20:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
          To: emacs-orgmode
        
        tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
        
        > Aloha,
        >
        > jenia.ivlev@gmail.com (jenia.ivlev) writes:
        >
        >> Also, what if I want to import the actual function defintion into
        >> another src block:
        >>
        >>     #+begin_src scheme
        >>         (+ (my-plus 3 4) 1)
        >>     #+end_src
        >>     something here that import the previous function definitions
        >>
        >> Is that possible?
        >
        > Yes, see section 14.10 Noweb reference syntax in the manual.
        >
        > You'll have something that looks like this:
        >
        > #+header: :noweb yes
        > #+begin_src scheme
        >   <<previous-function-definition>>
        >   (+ (previous-function 3 4) 1)
        > #+end_src
        >
        > hth,
        > Tom
        
        What do you mean? <<previous-function-definition>> should be replaced
        with the actual function definition? But I use babel-mode so that I can
        interlace code in a natural language document. I want these src blocks
        to be separate.
        
        ^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

      • • * Re: babel, header arguments.
            2014-11-21 20:09       ` jenia.ivlev
          @ 2014-11-21 20:32         ` jenia.ivlev
            2014-11-21 20:36         ` Thomas S. Dye
            1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
          From: jenia.ivlev @ 2014-11-21 20:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
            To: emacs-orgmode
          
          jenia.ivlev@gmail.com (jenia.ivlev) writes:
          
          > tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
          >
          >> Aloha,
          >>
          >> jenia.ivlev@gmail.com (jenia.ivlev) writes:
          >>
          >>> Also, what if I want to import the actual function defintion into
          >>> another src block:
          >>>
          >>>     #+begin_src scheme
          >>>         (+ (my-plus 3 4) 1)
          >>>     #+end_src
          >>>     something here that import the previous function definitions
          >>>
          >>> Is that possible?
          >>
          >> Yes, see section 14.10 Noweb reference syntax in the manual.
          >>
          >> You'll have something that looks like this:
          >>
          >> #+header: :noweb yes
          >> #+begin_src scheme
          >>   <<previous-function-definition>>
          >>   (+ (previous-function 3 4) 1)
          >> #+end_src
          >>
          >> hth,
          >> Tom
          >
          > What do you mean? <<previous-function-definition>> should be replaced
          > with the actual function definition? But I use babel-mode so that I can
          > interlace code in a natural language document. I want these src blocks
          > to be separate.
          >
          >
          >
          
          
          Tom, thanks so so much.
          If someone is interested: 
          
              #+name: my-plus
              #+begin_src scheme :noweb-ref my-plus
              (define my-plus
                (lambda (x y) (+ x y)))
              (my-plus 3 3)
              #+end_src
              
              #+RESULTS: my-plus
              : 6
              
              
              #+name: my-plus2
              #+header: :noweb yes 
              #+begin_src scheme
              <<my-plus>>
              (define my-plus2
                (lambda () (+ (my-plus 3 4) 1)))
              (my-plus2)
              #+end_src
          
              #+RESULTS: my-plus2
              : 8
          
          ^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

        • * Re: babel, header arguments.
            2014-11-21 20:09       ` jenia.ivlev
            2014-11-21 20:32         ` jenia.ivlev
          @ 2014-11-21 20:36         ` Thomas S. Dye
            2014-11-21 20:55           ` jenia.ivlev
            1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
          From: Thomas S. Dye @ 2014-11-21 20:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
            To: jenia.ivlev; +Cc: emacs-orgmode
          
          jenia.ivlev@gmail.com (jenia.ivlev) writes:
          
          > tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
          >
          >> Aloha,
          >>
          >> jenia.ivlev@gmail.com (jenia.ivlev) writes:
          >>
          >>> Also, what if I want to import the actual function defintion into
          >>> another src block:
          >>>
          >>>     #+begin_src scheme
          >>>         (+ (my-plus 3 4) 1)
          >>>     #+end_src
          >>>     something here that import the previous function definitions
          >>>
          >>> Is that possible?
          >>
          >> Yes, see section 14.10 Noweb reference syntax in the manual.
          >>
          >> You'll have something that looks like this:
          >>
          >> #+header: :noweb yes
          >> #+begin_src scheme
          >>   <<previous-function-definition>>
          >>   (+ (previous-function 3 4) 1)
          >> #+end_src
          >>
          >> hth,
          >> Tom
          >
          > What do you mean? <<previous-function-definition>> should be replaced
          > with the actual function definition? But I use babel-mode so that I can
          > interlace code in a natural language document. I want these src blocks
          > to be separate.
          >
          >
          
          Sorry, it refers to the name of the source code block.
          
          ,-------------------------------------------------------------------------
          | The “noweb” (see <http://www.cs.tufts.edu/~nr/noweb/>) Literate         
          | Programming system allows named blocks of code to be referenced by using
          | the familiar Noweb syntax:                                              
          |                                                                         
          |      <<code-block-name>>                                                
          `-------------------------------------------------------------------------
          
          hth,
          Tom
          
          -- 
          Thomas S. Dye
          http://www.tsdye.com
          
          ^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

        • • * Re: babel, header arguments.
              2014-11-21 20:36         ` Thomas S. Dye
            @ 2014-11-21 20:55           ` jenia.ivlev
              0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
            From: jenia.ivlev @ 2014-11-21 20:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
              To: emacs-orgmode
            
            tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
            
            > jenia.ivlev@gmail.com (jenia.ivlev) writes:
            >
            >> tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes:
            >>
            >>> Aloha,
            >>>
            >>> jenia.ivlev@gmail.com (jenia.ivlev) writes:
            >>>
            >>>> Also, what if I want to import the actual function defintion into
            >>>> another src block:
            >>>>
            >>>>     #+begin_src scheme
            >>>>         (+ (my-plus 3 4) 1)
            >>>>     #+end_src
            >>>>     something here that import the previous function definitions
            >>>>
            >>>> Is that possible?
            >>>
            >>> Yes, see section 14.10 Noweb reference syntax in the manual.
            >>>
            >>> You'll have something that looks like this:
            >>>
            >>> #+header: :noweb yes
            >>> #+begin_src scheme
            >>>   <<previous-function-definition>>
            >>>   (+ (previous-function 3 4) 1)
            >>> #+end_src
            >>>
            >>> hth,
            >>> Tom
            >>
            >> What do you mean? <<previous-function-definition>> should be replaced
            >> with the actual function definition? But I use babel-mode so that I can
            >> interlace code in a natural language document. I want these src blocks
            >> to be separate.
            >>
            >>
            >
            > Sorry, it refers to the name of the source code block.
            >
            > ,-------------------------------------------------------------------------
            > | The “noweb” (see <http://www.cs.tufts.edu/~nr/noweb/>) Literate         
            > | Programming system allows named blocks of code to be referenced by using
            > | the familiar Noweb syntax:                                              
            > |                                                                         
            > |      <<code-block-name>>                                                
            > `-------------------------------------------------------------------------
            >
            > hth,
            > Tom
            
            
            I have one last quick question, I have an exmaple here with no-web that
            I think should work but doesnt. I wonder why:
            
                #+BEGIN_SRC C :noweb-ref begin
                int main() {
                  printf("Line 1\n");
                
                #+END_SRC
                
                #+BEGIN_SRC C  :noweb-ref middle
                printf("Second\n");
                #+END_SRC
                
                #+BEGIN_SRC C  :noweb-ref end
                }
                main();
                #+END_SRC
                
                
                #+BEGIN_SRC C  :noweb yes
                
                    <<begin>>
                    <<middle>>
                    <<end>>
                    printf("some appropriate debug word");
                
             
                #+END_SRC
                
                And the output is:
                /tmp/babel-15080Ms4/C-src-150805OE.c: In function ‘main’:
                /tmp/babel-15080Ms4/C-src-150805OE.c:6:7: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ‘printf’
                       printf("Line 1\n");
                       ^
                /tmp/babel-15080Ms4/C-src-150805OE.c: At top level:
                /tmp/babel-15080Ms4/C-src-150805OE.c:10:5: warning: data definition has no type or storage class
                     main();
                     ^
                /tmp/babel-15080Ms4/C-src-150805OE.c:12:8: error: expected declaration specifiers or ‘...’ before string constant
                 printf("asti");
                        ^
                /bin/bash: /tmp/babel-15080Ms4/C-bin-15080GZK: Permission denied
            
            Or if I dont include the 
            
                printf("some appropriate debug word");
            
            then, I get no output at all.
            
                `Code block produced no output.`
            
            
            So my question is how do I make this work. lol.
                
            
            Thanks in advance again
            
            ^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2014-11-21 20:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2014-11-18 18:44 babel, header arguments jenia.ivlev
2014-11-20  9:36 ` Sebastien Vauban
2014-11-21 19:35   ` jenia.ivlev
2014-11-21 19:49     ` Thomas S. Dye
2014-11-21 20:09       ` jenia.ivlev
2014-11-21 20:32         ` jenia.ivlev
2014-11-21 20:36         ` Thomas S. Dye
2014-11-21 20:55           ` jenia.ivlev

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).