From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jenia.ivlev@gmail.com (jenia.ivlev) Subject: Re: babel, header arguments. Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:09:26 -0500 Message-ID: <87bno0iadl.fsf@gmail.com> References: <8761ec2vsp.fsf@gmail.com> <86389emcxa.fsf@example.com> <87h9xsibxv.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42649) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XruU7-0006Sf-HZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:07:21 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XruU0-0002kg-CZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:07:15 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:59237) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XruU0-0002kb-5U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:07:08 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XruTz-0001e1-KL for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 21:07:07 +0100 Received: from modemcable112.235-178-173.mc.videotron.ca ([173.178.235.112]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 21:07:07 +0100 Received: from jenia.ivlev by modemcable112.235-178-173.mc.videotron.ca with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Nov 2014 21:07:07 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org tsd@tsdye.com (Thomas S. Dye) writes: > Aloha, > > jenia.ivlev@gmail.com (jenia.ivlev) writes: > >> Also, what if I want to import the actual function defintion into >> another src block: >> >> #+begin_src scheme >> (+ (my-plus 3 4) 1) >> #+end_src >> something here that import the previous function definitions >> >> Is that possible? > > Yes, see section 14.10 Noweb reference syntax in the manual. > > You'll have something that looks like this: > > #+header: :noweb yes > #+begin_src scheme > <> > (+ (previous-function 3 4) 1) > #+end_src > > hth, > Tom What do you mean? <> should be replaced with the actual function definition? But I use babel-mode so that I can interlace code in a natural language document. I want these src blocks to be separate.