* Two ob-lua versions @ 2018-02-11 4:20 Thibault Marin 2018-02-11 9:22 ` Nicolas Goaziou 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Thibault Marin @ 2018-02-11 4:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-org list Hi maintainers, I noticed that a recent change added an ob-lua.el file to contrib/lisp/. Since there is already an ob-lua.el in lisp/, I was wondering if the new version was adding functionality not supported by the one in lisp/ (it does not seem to be the case on casual inspection) and if so, whether they could/should be merged. Thanks, thibault ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Two ob-lua versions 2018-02-11 4:20 Two ob-lua versions Thibault Marin @ 2018-02-11 9:22 ` Nicolas Goaziou 2018-02-14 1:28 ` Satoru KURASHIKI 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Nicolas Goaziou @ 2018-02-11 9:22 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thibault Marin; +Cc: emacs-org list Hello, Thibault Marin <thibault.marin@gmx.com> writes: > I noticed that a recent change added an ob-lua.el file to contrib/lisp/. > Since there is already an ob-lua.el in lisp/, I was wondering if the new > version was adding functionality not supported by the one in lisp/ (it > does not seem to be the case on casual inspection) and if so, whether > they could/should be merged. I just realized that, too. It seems wrong. I'm Cc'ing stardiviner so we can have some insight about it. stardiviner, would you mind explaining why you need to create an "ob-lua.el" library in "contrib/" ? Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Two ob-lua versions 2018-02-11 9:22 ` Nicolas Goaziou @ 2018-02-14 1:28 ` Satoru KURASHIKI 2018-02-14 10:18 ` numbchild 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Satoru KURASHIKI @ 2018-02-14 1:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: emacs-org list hi, On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> wrote: > Hello, > > Thibault Marin <thibault.marin@gmx.com> writes: > >> I noticed that a recent change added an ob-lua.el file to contrib/lisp/. >> Since there is already an ob-lua.el in lisp/, I was wondering if the new >> version was adding functionality not supported by the one in lisp/ (it >> does not seem to be the case on casual inspection) and if so, whether >> they could/should be merged. > > I just realized that, too. It seems wrong. I'm Cc'ing stardiviner so we > can have some insight about it. Anyway this breaks installation with package.el in org-plus-contrib case. because of conflicting "ob-lua.el" filename. > stardiviner, would you mind explaining why you need to create an > "ob-lua.el" library in "contrib/" ? It has to be fixed, so please revert that merge, until stardiviner will notice this thread and retry PR... regards, -- KURASHIKI Satoru ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Two ob-lua versions 2018-02-14 1:28 ` Satoru KURASHIKI @ 2018-02-14 10:18 ` numbchild 2018-02-14 10:29 ` numbchild 0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: numbchild @ 2018-02-14 10:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Satoru KURASHIKI; +Cc: emacs-org list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1442 bytes --] Hi, sorry for this. I have not noticed that. I will create an PR to remove my `ob-lua.el` as soon as fast. [stardiviner] <Hack this world!> GPG key ID: 47C32433 IRC(freeenode): stardiviner Twitter: @numbchild Key fingerprint = 9BAA 92BC CDDD B9EF 3B36 CB99 B8C4 B8E5 47C3 2433 Blog: http://stardiviner.github.io/ On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Satoru KURASHIKI <lurdan@gmail.com> wrote: > hi, > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> > wrote: > > Hello, > > > > Thibault Marin <thibault.marin@gmx.com> writes: > > > >> I noticed that a recent change added an ob-lua.el file to contrib/lisp/. > >> Since there is already an ob-lua.el in lisp/, I was wondering if the new > >> version was adding functionality not supported by the one in lisp/ (it > >> does not seem to be the case on casual inspection) and if so, whether > >> they could/should be merged. > > > > I just realized that, too. It seems wrong. I'm Cc'ing stardiviner so we > > can have some insight about it. > > Anyway this breaks installation with package.el in org-plus-contrib case. > because of conflicting "ob-lua.el" filename. > > > stardiviner, would you mind explaining why you need to create an > > "ob-lua.el" library in "contrib/" ? > > It has to be fixed, so please revert that merge, until stardiviner will > notice > this thread and retry PR... > > regards, > -- > KURASHIKI Satoru > > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2464 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Two ob-lua versions 2018-02-14 10:18 ` numbchild @ 2018-02-14 10:29 ` numbchild 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: numbchild @ 2018-02-14 10:29 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Satoru KURASHIKI; +Cc: emacs-org list [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1952 bytes --] I created a PR now https://code.orgmode.org/bzg/org-mode/pulls/4 . Really sorry for this. @Nicolas , can you merge it now? [stardiviner] <Hack this world!> GPG key ID: 47C32433 IRC(freeenode): stardiviner Twitter: @numbchild Key fingerprint = 9BAA 92BC CDDD B9EF 3B36 CB99 B8C4 B8E5 47C3 2433 Blog: http://stardiviner.github.io/ On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 6:18 PM, numbchild@gmail.com <numbchild@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, sorry for this. I have not noticed that. I will create an PR to remove > my `ob-lua.el` as soon as fast. > > [stardiviner] <Hack this world!> GPG key ID: 47C32433 > IRC(freeenode): stardiviner Twitter: @numbchild > Key fingerprint = 9BAA 92BC CDDD B9EF 3B36 CB99 B8C4 B8E5 47C3 2433 > Blog: http://stardiviner.github.io/ > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Satoru KURASHIKI <lurdan@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> hi, >> >> On Sun, Feb 11, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> >> wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > Thibault Marin <thibault.marin@gmx.com> writes: >> > >> >> I noticed that a recent change added an ob-lua.el file to >> contrib/lisp/. >> >> Since there is already an ob-lua.el in lisp/, I was wondering if the >> new >> >> version was adding functionality not supported by the one in lisp/ (it >> >> does not seem to be the case on casual inspection) and if so, whether >> >> they could/should be merged. >> > >> > I just realized that, too. It seems wrong. I'm Cc'ing stardiviner so we >> > can have some insight about it. >> >> Anyway this breaks installation with package.el in org-plus-contrib case. >> because of conflicting "ob-lua.el" filename. >> >> > stardiviner, would you mind explaining why you need to create an >> > "ob-lua.el" library in "contrib/" ? >> >> It has to be fixed, so please revert that merge, until stardiviner will >> notice >> this thread and retry PR... >> >> regards, >> -- >> KURASHIKI Satoru >> >> > [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3701 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-02-14 10:30 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-02-11 4:20 Two ob-lua versions Thibault Marin 2018-02-11 9:22 ` Nicolas Goaziou 2018-02-14 1:28 ` Satoru KURASHIKI 2018-02-14 10:18 ` numbchild 2018-02-14 10:29 ` numbchild
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).